Journals / Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 6

A Research on Determination of Fish Marketing Margins in Istanbul Province of Turkey

Pages
801–807
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The fact that; fishermen must sell their productsthrough the cooperative to prevent low price formation during the auction and to reduce marketing expenditures was achieved.In order to increase producer income, it is very important to increase the amount of fishery products marketed throughcooperatives by changing the brokerage system where fishermen market their products by borrowing.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to determine the distribution of the mediator margins and marketing costs throughout thefishermen, brokers and retailers per one kilogram of commercially most preferred species in the sample of Istanbul province,Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The percentages of fishermen’s income, brokers’ income, marketing costs,retailers’ costs and retailers’ income within one kilogram of fish were varied between, 32.78%and%54.84; 4.46% and7.40%;2.56% and 4.42%;26.66%and48.02%,6.67% and 12.04% respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The fact that; fishermen must sell their productsthrough the cooperative to prevent low price formation during the auction and to reduce marketing expenditures was achieved.In order to increase producer income, it is very important to increase the amount of fishery products marketed throughcooperatives by changing the brokerage system where fishermen market their products by borrowing.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The aim of this study was to determine the distribution of the mediator margins and marketing costs throughout thefishermen, brokers and retailers per one kilogram of commercially most preferred species in the sample of Istanbul province,Turkey. The primary data was collected with questionnaires conducted on brokers and the intense interviews with retailers.The most common commerce channel as fishermen-broker-retailer-consumer was examined. Marketing margins of fishermenand retailers active in fish marketing channels were calculated by examining the difference between monthly sales price andmonthly purchase price at every stage in the study. The percentages of fishermen’s income, brokers’ income, marketing costs,retailers’ costs and retailers’ income within one kilogram of fish were varied between, 32.78%and%54.84; 4.46% and7.40%;2.56% and 4.42%;26.66%and48.02%,6.67% and 12.04% respectively. The fact that; fishermen must sell their productsthrough the cooperative to prevent low price formation during the auction and to reduce marketing expenditures was achieved.In order to increase producer income, it is very important to increase the amount of fishery products marketed throughcooperatives by changing the brokerage system where fishermen market their products by borrowing.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYGISIZ, F., EKEN, M. (2018). A Research on Determination of Fish Marketing Margins in Istanbul Province of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 6, 801–807. https://ajindex.com/articles/399441

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Abassian, M., Karim, M.H., Esmaeili, M., & Ebrahimzadeh, H. (2012). The Economic Analysis of Marketing Margin of Mazafati Date: A Case Study of Sistan and Blouchestan-Iran. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 4(7), 390-397.
  2. Akyol, O., Ceyhan, T., & Ünal, V. (2006). Fishery Cooperatives and Societies of Marmara Region and their Roles in Bluefish Fishery. Ege University Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 23(3-4), 379-383.
  3. Ali, E.A., Gaya, H.I.M., & Jampada, T.N. (2008). Economic Analysis of Fresh Fish Marketing in Maiduguri Gamboru Market and Kachallari Alau Dam Landing Site of Northeastern, Nigeria. Journal Of Agriculture and Social Sciences, 4(1), 23–6.
  4. Aswathy, N.,& Abdussamad, E.M. (2013). Price Behaviour and Marketing Efficiency of Marine Fish in Tuticorin, Tamil Nadu. Journal of Fisheries Economics and Development, 13(2), 29-35.
  5. Aswathy, N., Narayanakumar, R., & Harshan, N.K. (2014).
  6. Marketing Cost, Margins and Efficiency of Domestic Marine Fish Marketing in Kerala. Indian Journal of Fisheries, 61(2), 97-102.
  7. Benli, K. (2009). Socio-economic structure and seafood marketing of Istanbul city. Marmara Sea costline fishing (MSc Thesis). Namık Kemal University, Tekirdağ, Turkey. Bozyiğit, S.,& Doğan, G.K. (2015). The Marketing Problems of Natural and Organic Product Producers in Turkey: An Exploratory Study. Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 17(2), 33- 47.http://dx.doi.org/10.5578/jeas.10297
  8. Ceyhan, V.,& Gene, H. (2014). Productive Efficiency of Commercial Fishing: Evidence from the Samsun Province of Black Sea, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 14, 309-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.4194/1303-2712-v14_2_02
  9. Çeliker, S.A., Dönmez, D., Gül, U., Demir, A., Genç, Y., Kalanlar, G., &Özdemir, G. (2006). Socio-economic analysis of fishing enterprises in the Black Sea Region. Ankara,
  10. Turkey, Agricultural Economics Research Institute, 122 pp. Çeliker, S.A., Demir, A., Gül, U., Dönmez, D., Özdemir, G., & Kalanlar, G. (2008). Socio-economic Analysis of Fishing Enterprises in the Aegean Region. Ankara, Turkey,Agricultural Economics Research Institute, 107 pp. Dağtekin, M. (2010). Fishery production and marketing structure in Trabzon (MSc Thesis). Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey. DM. (2014). Special commission report on fisheries. Retrieved from http://tarim.kalkinma.gov.tr/wpcontent/uploads/2014/ 12/Su_Ürünleri_oik_Raporu.pdf Doğan, K. (2010). Socio-economical Analysis of Fishe