Journals / Türkderm-Deri Hastalıkları ve Frengi Arşivi / 2019 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 4

Üçüncü basamak bir hastanedeki mikozis fungoides, mikozis fungoides varyantları, alt tipleri ve atipik formlarının klinikopatolojik değerlendirilmesi

The evaluation of variants, subtypes and atypical forms of mycosis fungoides in a tertiary hospital

Pages
140–144
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

MF varyantlarının, alt tiplerinin ve atipik formlarının erken teşhisi ve tedavisi için MF’den şüphelenilmesi gereklidir.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Amaç: Mikozis fungoides (MF) en sık görülen kutanöz T hücreli lenfoma tipidir.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Gereç ve Yöntem: Hastanemiz dermatoloji kliniğinde 2008-2018 yılları arasında takip edilen MF hastaları retrospektif olarak incelendi.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:MF varyantlarının, alt tiplerinin ve atipik formlarının erken teşhisi ve tedavisi için MF’den şüphelenilmesi gereklidir.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008-2018 · 117 hasta
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Amaç: Mikozis fungoides (MF) en sık görülen kutanöz T hücreli lenfoma tipidir. MF’nin erken lezyonları, alt tipleri ve klinik varyantları, diğer dermatozları taklit edebilir. Çalışmamızda, hastanemiz dermatoloji kliniğinde takipli MF hastalarında klasik veya atipik seyir gösteren varyantların klinik ve histopatolojik özelliklerini ortaya koymayı amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Hastanemiz dermatoloji kliniğinde 2008-2018 yılları arasında takip edilen MF hastaları retrospektif olarak incelendi. Hastaların sosyodemografik özellikleri, hastalık süresi, klinik bulguları, evreleri, verilen tedaviler ve atipik varyantları kaydedildi. Bulgular: Klinik ve histopatolojik olarak MF tanılı 117 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastaların 64’ü kadın (%54), 53’ü erkek (%46) idi. Olguların yaş ortalaması 55,6 idi. Hastalığın başlangıcından tanıya kadar geçen süre ortalama 5, 6 yıldı. Altmış bir hasta (%52,1) evre IA, 20 hasta (%17) evre IB, 31 hasta (26,4) evre IIA, 3 hasta (%2,5) evre IIB, 1 hasta (%0,85) evre IIIB ve 1 hasta (%0,85) evre IVA idi. Altı olguda (%5,1) hastalığın atipik formları saptandı. Üç hasta (%2,5) foliküler MF, birer hasta ise hipopigmente, iktiyoziform ve granülomatöz MF idi. Tedavide topikal steroidlerin yanında 99 hastaya (%84,6) fototerapi, 20’sine (%17) asitretin, 4’üne (%3,4) metotreksat ve 1 hastaya (%0,85) sistemik interferon başlandı. Sonuç: MF varyantları, subtipleri, atipik formları ve MF’nin erken lezyonları, diğer dermatozları taklit ederek tanı ve tedavide gecikmeye neden olabilir. MF varyantlarının, alt tiplerinin ve atipik formlarının erken teşhisi ve tedavisi için MF’den şüphelenilmesi gereklidir.

Özet

Background and Design: Clinical variants, subtypes, and early mycosis fungoides (MF) lesions may mimic other dermatoses. MF is the most common type of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical and histopathological features of patients with classical and variants, subtypes, or atypical forms of MF in our dermatology department. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated MF patients who were followed up in our dermatology department between 2008 and 2018. Demographic features (age and gender), duration of disease, clinical findings, stages, and treatments of patients with classical and atypical variants of MF were evaluated. Results: A total of 117 patients diagnosed clinically and histopathologically with MF were included in the study. Sixty-four of the patients were female (54%), and 53 were male (46%). The mean age at diagnosis was 55.6±16.03 years. The mean disease duration was 5.6 years. Sixtyone patients (52.1%) had stage IA, 20 patients (17%) had stage IB, 31 patients (26.4%) had stage IIA, three patients (2.5%) had IIB stage, one patient (0.85%) had IIIB stage and one patient (0.85%) had stage IVA disease. Atypical forms of the disease were detected in six patients (5.1%). Three (2.5%) of these cases were follicular MF, and one patient for each type of hypopigmented, ichthyosiform, and granulomatous MF. In addition to topical steroids, 99 patients (84.6%) received phototherapy, 20 patients (17%) had acitretin, six patients (5.1%) had topical bexarotene, four patients (3.4%) had methotrexate and one patient (0.85%) had systemic interferon treatment. Conclusion: MF variants, subtypes, atypical forms, and early lesions of MF may cause a delay in the diagnosis and treatment by mimicking other dermatoses. Suspicion of MF is warranted for early diagnosis and treatment of MF variants, subtypes, atypical forms of MF

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDOĞAN, H. K., AĞAOĞLU, E., ACER, E., ARIK, D., SARAÇOĞLU, Z. N. (2019). Üçüncü basamak bir hastanedeki mikozis fungoides, mikozis fungoides varyantları, alt tipleri ve atipik formlarının klinikopatolojik değerlendirilmesi. Türkderm-Deri Hastalıkları ve Frengi Arşivi, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 4, 140–144. https://ajindex.com/articles/399027

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Li JY, Pulitzer MP, Myskowski PL, et al: A case-control study of clinicopathologic features, prognosis, and therapeutic responses in patients with granulomatous mycosis fungoides. J Am Acad Dermatol 2013;69:366- 74
  2. Engin B, Uzun A, Kutlubay Z, Tüzün Y. Mikozis fungoides güncel. Dermatoz 2016:1
  3. Jang MS, Kang DY, Park JB, et al: Pityriasis lichenoides-like mycosis fungoides: clinical and histologic features and response to phototherapy. Ann Dermatol 2016;28:540-7
  4. Furlan FC, Sanches JA: Hypopigmented mycosis fungoides: a review of its clinical features and pathophysiology. An Bras Dermatol 2013;88:954-60
  5. Kazakov DV, Burg G, Kempf W: Clinicopathological spectrum of mycosis fungoides. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2004;18:397-415
  6. Virmani P, Levin L, Myskowski PL, et al: Clinical outcome and prognosis of young patients with mycosis fungoides. Pediatr Dermatol 2017;34:547-53
  7. Alsaleh QA, Nanda A, Al-Ajmi H, et al: Clinicoepidemiological features of mycosis fungoides in Kuwait, 1991-2006. Int J Dermatol 2010;49:1393-8
  8. Fatemi Naeini F, Abtahi-Naeini B, Sadeghiyan H, Nilforoushzadeh MA, Najafian J, Pourazizi M: Mycosis fungoides in Iranian population: an epidemiological and clinicopathological study. J Skin Cancer 2015;2015:306543
  9. Jang MS, Baek JW, Park JB, et al: Narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy of early stage mycosis fungoides in korean patients. Ann Dermatol 2011;23:474-80
  10. Desai M, Liu S, Parker S: Clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, and survival of 393 patients with mycosis fungoidesand Sézary syndrome in the southeastern United States: a single-institution cohort. J Am Acad Dermatol 2015;72:276-85
  11. AlGhamdi KM, Arafah MM, Al-Mubarak LA, Khachemoune A, Al-Saif FM: Profile of mycosis fungoides in 43 Saudi patients. Ann Saudi Med 2012;32:283-7
  12. Photiou L, van der Weyden C, McCormack C, Miles Prince H: Systemic treatment options for advanced-stage mycosis fungoides and Sézary Syndrome. Curr Oncol Rep 2018;20:32
  13. Hodak E, Pavlovsky L: Phototherapy of mycosis fungoides. Dermatol Clin 2015;33:697-702
  14. Mantaka P, Helsing P, Gjersvik P, Bassarova A, Clausen OP, Delabie J: Clinical and histopathological features of folliculotropic mycosis fungoides: a Norwegian patient series. Acta Derm Venereol 2013;93:325-9
  15. Deonizio JM, Ascef RD, Sanches JA: Folliculotropic mycosis fungoides: clinical and epidemiological evaluation in a single center in Brazil. Int J Dermatol 2016;55:e256-61
  16. Marschalkó M, Er