Journals / Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar / 2021 / Cilt: 13 Sayı: Ek 1 (Araştırma Sayısı)

Psychometric Properties of Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale - Short Form in Turkish Community Sample

Perth Duygusal Tepkisellik Ölçeği - Kısa Formunun Türk Toplum Örneklemindeki Psikometrik Özellikleri

Pages
281–297
Publication Date
2021-12-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Multiple linear regression analysis results indicated that the most predictive variable for somatization, obsessive symptoms and anxiety was general negative reactivity and for depression it was general positive reactivity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the short form of the Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale in Turkish community sample.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample consisted of 236 participants aged between 18-60.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Multiple linear regression analysis results indicated that the most predictive variable for somatization, obsessive symptoms and anxiety was general negative reactivity and for depression it was general positive reactivity.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Perth Duygusal Tepkisellik Ölçeği · geçerlik · güvenirlik

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the short form of the Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale in Turkish community sample. The sample consisted of 236 participants aged between 18-60. The structure of the scale was examined by confirmatory factor analysis. Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale - Short Form, Emotional Reactivity Scale and Brief Symptom Inventory (depression, somatization, anxiety and obsessive symptoms subscales) were used for the validity study. As a result of confirmatory factor analysis it was seen that the structure model which has 6 subscale and 2 composite scale was in consistent with the structure of the original scale. Multiple linear regression analysis results indicated that the most predictive variable for somatization, obsessive symptoms and anxiety was general negative reactivity and for depression it was general positive reactivity. No differentiation was found between the subscales and composite scales of Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale – Short Form according to the gender. As a result of reliability analysis the Cronbach’s Alpha values were found as 0.91 for general negative reactivity, 0.92 for general positive reactivity, 0.76 for negative-activation, 0.81 for negative-intensity, 0.85 for negative-duration, 0.79 for positive-activation, 0.82 for positive-intensity, 0.83 for positive-duration. As a result it was determined that Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale – Short Form is a valid and reliable scale for Turkish community.

Özet

Bu çalışmada Perth Duygusal Tepkisellik Ölçeği’nin kısa formunun Türk toplum örnekleminde psikometrik özelliklerinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Örneklem 18-60 yaş aralığında 236 kişiden oluşmaktadır. Ölçek yapısı doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile incelenmiştir. Geçerlik çalışması kapsamında Duygu Düzenleme Güçlüğü Ölçeği – Kısa Form, Duygusal Tepkisellik Ölçeği ve Kısa Semptom Envanteri (depresyon, somatizasyon, anksiyete ve obsesif belirtiler alt ölçekleri) kullanılmıştır. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda 6 alt bileşen ve 2 üst bileşenden oluşan yapı modelinin ölçeğin yapısına uygun olduğu görülmüştür. Çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizi sonuçlarına göre ise somatizasyonu, obsesif belirtileri ve anksiyeteyi en fazla yordayan değişkenin genel negatif tepkisellik, depresyonu en fazla yordayan değişkenin ise genel pozitif tepkisellik olduğu belirlenmiştir. Perth Duygusal Tepkisellik Ölçeği – Kısa Form alt ve bileşik ölçeklerinin cinsiyete göre farklılaşmadığı saptanmıştır. Güvenirlik analizleri sonucunda Cronbach Alfa değerleri genel negatif tepkisellik için 0.91, genel pozitif tepkisellik için 0.92, negatif–aktivasyon için 0.76, negatif–yoğunluk için 0.81, negatif–süre için 0.85, pozitif–aktivasyon için 0.79, pozitif–yoğunluk için 0.82, pozitif–süre için 0.83 olarak bulunmuştur. Sonuç olarak Perth Duygusal Tepkisellik Ölçeği – Kısa Formu’nun Türk toplumu için geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçüm aracı olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BALABAN, G., BİLGE, Y. (2021). Psychometric Properties of Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale - Short Form in Turkish Community Sample. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, Cilt: 13 Sayı: Ek 1 (Araştırma Sayısı), 281–297. https://ajindex.com/articles/398666

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Bachorowski JA, Braaten EB. (1994). Emotional intensity: measurement and theoretical implications. Pers Indiv Differ, 17(2): 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)90025-6
  2. Barnhart WR, Braden AL, Jordan AK. (2020). Negative and positive emotional eating uniquely interact with ease of activation, intensity, and duration of emotional reactivity to predict increased binge eating. Appetite, 151: 104688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104688
  3. Barrett LF, Gross J, Christensen TC, Benvenuto M. (2001). Knowing what you're feeling and knowing what to do about it: Mapping the relation between emotion differentiation and emotion regulation. Cogn Emot, 15(6): 713–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930143000239
  4. Becerra R, Campitelli G. (2013). Emotional reactivity: critical analysis and proposal of a new scale. Int J Appl Psychol, 3(6), 161-168. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijap.20130306.03
  5. Becerra R, Preece D, Campitelli G, Scott-Pillow G. (2019). The assessment of emotional reactivity across negative and positive emotions: development and validation of the Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale (PERS). Assessment, 26(5): 867-879. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117694455
  6. Benning SD, Ait Oumeziane B. (2017). Reduced positive emotion and underarousal are uniquely associated with subclinical depression symptoms: Evidence from psychophysiology, self-report, and symptom clusters. Psychophysiology, 54(7): 1010-1030. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12853
  7. Bilge Y. (2020). Davranışsal İnhibisyon Sistemi ve Davranışsal Aktivasyon Sistemi Ölçeğinin Türk toplum örnekleminde psikometrik özellikleri. Psikiyatr Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 12(Supply 1): 219-234. https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.785113
  8. Bjureberg J, Ljótsson B, Tull MT, Hedman E, Sahlin H, Lundh LG et al.(2016). Development and validation of a brief version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale: The DERS-16. J Psychopathol Behav Assess, 38(2): 284-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-015-9514-x
  9. Boyes ME, Wilmot A, Hasking PA. (2020). Nonsuicidal Self-Injury-Related Differences in the Experience of Negative and Positive Emotion. Suicide and Life Threat Behav, 50(2): 437-448. https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12599
  10. Britton WB, Bootzin RR, Cousins JC, Hasler BP, Peck T, Shapiro SL. (2010). The contribution of mindfulness practice to a multicomponent behavioral sleep intervention following substance abuse treatment in adolescents: a treatment-development study. Subst Abus, 31(2): 86-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/08897071003641297 Byl