Journals / Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the elderly: Some considerations and approaches

Pages
199–205
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In conclusion, ERCP is a safe and effective procedure in patients from 65 to 79 years of age and patients aged 80 and older.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Cholelithiasis is an old age disease but old age is not a disease.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Between June 2014 and May 2018, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was carried out on patients in our hospital with obstructive jaundice and acute cholangitis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In conclusion, ERCP is a safe and effective procedure in patients from 65 to 79 years of age and patients aged 80 and older.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction: Cholelithiasis is an old age disease but old age is not a disease. Biliary tract disorders are increasingly seen in elderly patients and this is related to the aging of the global population. In the current study, our main concern was to communicate the message that the ERCP is a safe procedure in elderly patients with signs of biliary sepsis and adverse comorbid conditions. Materials and Methods: Between June 2014 and May 2018, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was carried out on patients in our hospital with obstructive jaundice and acute cholangitis. There were 154 patients over 80 years of age, 236 patients in the 65–79-year age group, and 422 patients under the age of 65, who served as the control group. Results: Our study was conducted on three age groups: under 65 years, from 65–79 years, and 80 years and older. The length of hospital stays and cost among the groups was compared. Duodenal diverticula were significantly more common in patients over 65 years of age (p>0.001). Significantly lower costs were found for patients under 65 years of age (Group A) in comparison with both Groups C and B (both p=0.001). The average length of hospital stay differed significantly among age groups and was significantly shorter in patients under 65 years of age than the 65–79-year age group as well as patients 80 years of age and older (p=0.001). Conclusion: In conclusion, ERCP is a safe and effective procedure in patients from 65 to 79 years of age and patients aged 80 and older. We suggest that emergency or early ERCP should be performed within 24–48 hours in elderly patients with acute cholangitis and biliary sepsis irrespective of the severity of the disease unless there are major contraindications.

🔖

Cite This Article

MUHAMMEDOĞLU, B., PİRCANOĞLU, E. M., ŞİRİKÇİ, V., SÜMER, F. (2020). Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the elderly: Some considerations and approaches. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4, 199–205. https://ajindex.com/articles/397193

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Amir Houshang Mohammad Alizadeh, Esmaeil Shamsi Afzali, Anahita Shahnazi, Azare Sanati, Dariush Mirsattari, Mohammad Reza Zali, “Utility and Safety of ERCP in the Elderly: A Comparative Study in Iran”, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy, vol. 2012, Article ID 439320, 5 pages, 2012. [CrossRef] 2. Talar-Wojnarowska R, Szulc G, Woźniak B, Pazurek M, Małecka-Panas E. Assessment of frequency and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients over 80 years of age. Pol Arch Med Wewn 2009;119:136–40. 3. Behlül B, Ayfer S, Sezgin V, Altay K, Mustafa C, Cem C, et al. Safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients 80 years of age and older. Prz Gastroenterol 2014;9:227–31. [CrossRef] 4. Strand DS. ERCP for biliary stones in the elderly: should we stop ducking the cholecystectomy? Endosc Int Open 2016;4:E91–2. [CrossRef] 5. Tarık Z. Nursal, Erhan Hamaloğlu. Gastrointestinal surgery in the elderly. Geriatri 1999;2:22–5. 6. Strøm C, Rasmussen LS, Sieber FE. Should general anaesthesia be avoided in the elderly? Anaesthesia 2014;69 Suppl 1:35–44. [CrossRef] 7. Triantafillidis JK, Merikas E, Nikolakis D, Papalois AE. Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: current issues. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:463–81. [CrossRef] 8. Pisano M, Ceresoli M, Allegri A, Belotti E, Coccolini F, Colombi R, et al. Single center retrospective analysis of early vs. delayed treatment in acute calculous cholecystitis: application of a clinical pathway and an economic analysis. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2015;21:373–9. [CrossRef] 9. Muhammedoğlu B. Single-stage treatment with ERCP and laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus two-stage treatment with ERCP followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy within six to eight weeks: a retrospective study. Turk J Surg 2019;35:178–84. [CrossRef] 10. Croker JR, Williams SG, Charlton M, Vaira D, Dowsett J. Endoscopic therapy for bile duct stones in a geriatric population. Postgrad Med J 1992;68:457–60. [CrossRef] 11. Kenig J, Wałęga P, Olszewska U, Konturek A, Nowak W. Geriatric Assessment as a qualification element for elective and emergency cholecystectomy in older patients. World J Emerg Surg 2016;11:36. [CrossRef] 12. Halil M, Cankurtaran M. Approach to the Geriatric Patient. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2008;28:S 262–6. 13. Mulki R, Shah R, Qayed E. Early vs late endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with acute cholangitis: A nationwide analysis.World J Gastrointest Endosc 2019;11:41–53. [