Journals / Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3

Examination of the Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Birth Memories and Recall Questionnaire

Pages
245–253
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.794 for the overall scale, and 0.797, 0.643, 0.760, 0.670, 0.785, and 0.725 for the subdimensions of emotional memory, ambivalent emo tional memory, centrality of memory to identity, coherence and reliving, sensory memory, and recall, respectively .

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This methodological study was designed to determine the validity and reliability of a Turkish version of the Birth Memories and Recall Questionnaire (BirthMARQ).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The study sample consisted of 400 women who were patients of 9 family health centers in Eskisehir, Turkey, and who had a child aged 0–12 months.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.794 for the overall scale, and 0.797, 0.643, 0.760, 0.670, 0.785, and 0.725 for the subdimensions of emotional memory, ambivalent emo tional memory, centrality of memory to identity, coherence and reliving, sensory memory, and recall, respectively .
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: This methodological study was designed to determine the validity and reliability of a Turkish version of the Birth Memories and Recall Questionnaire (BirthMARQ). Methods: The study sample consisted of 400 women who were patients of 9 family health centers in Eskisehir, Turkey, and who had a child aged 0–12 months. The data were collected using a sociodemographic data form, the BirthMARQ, and the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale. Validity and reliability analyses of the scale were performed using the responses of 387 women who completed the scales. Results: The linguistic validity of the BirthMARQ was determined to be sufficient after translation, back-translation, and expert consultation. The content validity index of the scale was 0.95. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin coefficient was 0.759 and the Bartlett chi-squared test value was 3079.458 (p<0.001). The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.794 for the overall scale, and 0.797, 0.643, 0.760, 0.670, 0.785, and 0.725 for the subdimensions of emotional memory, ambivalent emo tional memory, centrality of memory to identity, coherence and reliving, sensory memory, and recall, respectively . The goodness of fit index was 0.091 for the root mean square error of approximation, 0.091 for the standardized root mean square residual, 0.85 for the goodness of fit index, 0.91 for the comparative fit index, 0.91 for the incremental fit index, 0.85 for the relative fit index, and 0.88 for the normed fit index. Conclusion: The Turkish version of the BirthMARQ is a valid and reliable measurement tool that will be valuable in practice and future research.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPKARA, F. N., ÇAĞAN, Ö. (2021). Examination of the Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Birth Memories and Recall Questionnaire. Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3, 245–253. https://ajindex.com/articles/396548

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ghanbari-Homayi S, Fardiazar Z, Meedya S, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S, Asghari-Jafarabadi M, Mohammadi E, et al. Predictors of traumatic birth experience among a group of Iranian primipara women: a cross sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019;19:182
  2. Aktaş S: Multigravidas’ perceptions of traumatic childbirth: Its relation to some factors, the effect of previous type of birth and experience. Med Science 2018;7:203–9
  3. Foley S, Crawley R, Wilkie S, Ayers S. The birth memories and recall questionnaire (BirthMARQ): development and evaluation. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014;14:211
  4. İsbir GG, İnci F. Traumatic childbirth and nursing approaches. Kadın Sağlığı Hemşireliği Dergisi 2014;1:29–40
  5. Pašalic M, Hasanovic M. Treating childbirth trauma with EMDR - a case report. Psychiatr Danub 2018;30(Suppl 5):265–70
  6. Beck CT, Driscoll JW, Watson S: Traumatic childbirth. 1st ed., London: Routledge; 2013
  7. Elmir R, Schmied V, Wilkes L, Jackson D. Women's perceptions and experiences of a traumatic birth: a meta-ethnography. J Adv Nurs 2010;66:2142–53
  8. Peeler S, Stedmon J, Chung MC, Skirton H. Women's experiences of living with postnatal PTSD. Midwifery 2018;56:70–8
  9. Matos M, Pinto-Gouveia J. Shame as a traumatic memory. Clin Psychol Psychother 2010;17:299–312. 10. van Giezen AE, Arensman E, Spinhoven P, Wolters G. Consistency of memory for emotionally arousing events: a review of prospective and experimental studies. Clin Psychol Rev 2005;25:935–53
  10. Reed R, Sharman R, Inglis C: Women’s descriptions of childbirth trauma relating to care provider actions and interactions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017;17:21
  11. Størksen HT, Garthus-Niegel S, Adams SS, Vangen S, Eberhard-Gran M. Fear of childbirth and elective caesarean section: a population-based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015;15:221
  12. Brummelte S, Galea LA. Postpartum depression: etiology, treatment and consequences for maternal care. Horm Behav 2016;77:153–66
  13. Brown AT. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. In Brown AT, editor. Statistical power and sample size. 2nd ed., New York, NY: A Division of Guilford Publications; 2015. p. 380–1
  14. Engindeniz AN, Küey L, Kültür S. Edinburgh Doğum Sonrası Depresyon Ölçeği Türkçe formu geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. Bahar Sempozyumları 1996;1:51–2
  15. Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health 2006;29:489–97