SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gıda / 2014 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 5

Food Authenticity and Control Methods (Turkish with English Abstract)

Gıda Gerçekliği ve Kontrol Yöntemleri

Gülen YEŞİLÖREN
Aziz EKŞİ
Journal
Gıda
Pages
315–322
Publication Date
2014-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This review focuses on the basic analytical methods used for food authenticity control (spectrophotometric, electrophoretic, electronic, DNA-based, immunological) and its application areas.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Food authenticity is a subject that is important not only for consumer protection, but also for maintaining fair competition.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This term defines whether a food carries its own characteristics or not.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This review focuses on the basic analytical methods used for food authenticity control (spectrophotometric, electrophoretic, electronic, DNA-based, immunological) and its application areas.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Gıda gerçekliği · gıda hileleri · gerçeklik kontrolü

Abstract

Food authenticity is a subject that is important not only for consumer protection, but also for maintaining fair competition. This term defines whether a food carries its own characteristics or not. These characteristics can be associated with the origin of the food (region, varieties etc.), production method or composition of the food (adulteration, fraudulent etc.). In order to ensure the food authenticity, identification of control criteria and validated analytical methods are required primarily. Moreover new applications in the field of food authenticity must be developed depending on the improvements in the technique of adulteration. This review focuses on the basic analytical methods used for food authenticity control (spectrophotometric, electrophoretic, electronic, DNA-based, immunological) and its application areas.

Özet

Gıda gerçekliği tüketicinin korunması ve adil rekabetin sürdürülmesi açısından oldukça önemlidir. Bu kavram kısaca, bir gıdanın kendisine özgü özellikleri taşıyıp taşımadığını tanımlamaktadır. Bu özellikler gıdanın kökeni (bölge, çeşit vb.), üretim yöntemi veya gıdanın bileşimi (taklit, tağşiş vb.) ile ilişkili olabilmektedir. Gıda gerçekliğinin sağlanması için öncelikle kontrol kriterlerinin ve geçerli analiz yöntemlerinin tanımlanması gereklidir. Ayrıca hile tekniğindeki gelişmelere bağlı olarak kontrol yöntemlerinin de zamanla geliştirilmesi zorunludur. Bu derleme, gıda gerçekliğinin kontrolü için kullanılan başlıca analiz tekniklerine (spektrofotometrik, elektroforetik, elektronik, DNA temelli, immünolojik) ve uygulama alanlarına odaklanmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YEŞİLÖREN, G., EKŞİ, A. (2014). Food Authenticity and Control Methods (Turkish with English Abstract). Gıda, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 5, 315–322. https://ajindex.com/articles/39467

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Downey G. 1998. Food and food ingredient authentication by mid-infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics. Trends Anal Chem, 17(7), 418-424. 2. John Dennis M. 1998. Recent developments in food authentication. Analyst, 123(9), 151-156.
  2. Christy AA, Kasemsumran S, Du Y, Ozakı Y. 2004. The detection and quantification of adulteration in olive oil by near-infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics. Anal Sci, 20(6), 935-940. Miralbes C. 2008. Discrimination of European wheat varieties using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Food Chem, 106(1), 386-389.
  3. Ding H, Xu R. 2000. Near-infrared spectroscopic technique for detection of beef hamburger adulteration. J Agric Food Chem, 48(6), 2193-2198. 9. Zhu X, Li S, Shan Y, Zhang Z, Li G, Su D, Liu F. 2010. Detection of adulterants such as sweeteners materials in honey using near-infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics. J Food Eng, 101(1), 92-97. León L, Kelly JD, Downey G. 2005. Detection of apple juice adulteration using near-infrared transflectance spectroscopy. Appl spectrosc, 59(5), 593-599.
  4. Reid LM, Woodcock T, O’Donnell CP, Kelly JD, Downey G. 2005. Differentiation of apple juice samples on the basis of heat treatment and variety using chemometric analysis of MIR and NIR data. Food Res Int, 38(10), 1109-1115.
  5. Kılıc GB, Karahan AG, 2010. Fourier dönüflümlü kızılötesi (FTIR) spektroskopisi ve laktik asit bakterilerinin tanısında kullanılması. GIDA, 35(6), 445-452.
  6. Al-Jowder O, Kemsley E, Wilson RH. 2002. Detection of adulteration in cooked meat products by mid-infrared spectroscopy. J Agric Food Chem, 50(6), 1325-1329.
  7. Camps C, Robic R, Bruneau M, Laurens F. 2010. Rapid determination of soluble solids content and acidity of Black currant (Ribes nigrum L.) juice by mid-infrared spectroscopy performed in series. LWT - Food Sci Technol, 43(7), 1164-1167.
  8. Holland J, Kemsley E, Wilson R. 1998. Use of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and partial least squares regression for the detection of adulteration of strawberry purees. J Sci Food Agric, 76(2), 263-269.
  9. Uysal RS, Boyaci IH, Genis HE, Tamer U. 2013. Determination of butter adulteration with margarine using Raman spectroscopy. Food Chem, 141(4), 4397-4403. López-Díez EC, Bianchi G, Goodacre R. 2003. Rapid quantitative assessment of the adulteration of virgin olive oils with hazelnut oils using Raman spectroscopy and chemometrics. J Agric Food Chem, 51(21), 6145-6150.
  10. Zou M-Q, Zhang X-F, Qi X-H, Ma H-L, Dong Y, Liu C-W, Guo X, Wang H. 2009. Rapid authentication of oliv