Journals / Gıda / 2014 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 5

FOOD AUTHENTICITY AND CONTROL METHODS

GIDA GERÇEKLİĞİ ve KONTROL YÖNTEMLERİ

Journal
Gıda
Pages
315–322
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This review focuses on the basic analytical methods used for food authenticity control (spectrophotometric, electrophoretic, electronic, DNA-based, immunological) and its application areas.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Food authenticity is a subject that is important not only for consumer protection, but also for maintaining fair competition.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This term defines whether a food carries its own characteristics or not.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This review focuses on the basic analytical methods used for food authenticity control (spectrophotometric, electrophoretic, electronic, DNA-based, immunological) and its application areas.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Food authenticity is a subject that is important not only for consumer protection, but also for maintaining fair competition. This term defines whether a food carries its own characteristics or not. These characteristics can be associated with the origin of the food (region, varieties etc.), production method or composition of the food (adulteration, fraudulent etc.). In order to ensure the food authenticity, identification of control criteria and validated analytical methods are required primarily. Moreover new applications in the field of food authenticity must be developed depending on the improvements in the technique of adulteration. This review focuses on the basic analytical methods used for food authenticity control (spectrophotometric, electrophoretic, electronic, DNA-based, immunological) and its application areas.

Özet

Gıda gerçekliği tüketicinin korunması ve adil rekabetin sürdürülmesi açısından oldukça önemlidir. Bu kavram kısaca, bir gıdanın kendisine özgü özellikleri taşıyıp taşımadığını tanımlamaktadır. Bu özellikler gıdanın kökeni (bölge, çeşit vb.), üretim yöntemi veya gıdanın bileşimi (taklit, tağşiş vb.) ile ilişkili olabilmektedir. Gıda gerçekliğinin sağlanması için öncelikle kontrol kriterlerinin ve geçerli analiz yöntemlerinin tanımlanması gereklidir. Ayrıca hile tekniğindeki gelişmelere bağlı olarak kontrol yöntemlerinin de zamanla geliştirilmesi zorunludur. Bu derleme, gıda gerçekliğinin kontrolü için kullanılan başlıca analiz tekniklerine (spektrofotometrik, elektroforetik, elektronik, DNA temelli, immünolojik) ve uygulama alanlarına odaklanmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

EKŞİ, A., YEŞİLÖREN, G. (2022). FOOD AUTHENTICITY AND CONTROL METHODS. Gıda, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 5, 315–322. https://ajindex.com/articles/525314

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Downey G. 1998. Food and food ingredient authentication by mid-infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics. Trends Anal Chem, 17(7), 418-424
  2. John Dennis M. 1998. Recent developments in food authentication. Analyst, 123(9), 151-156
  3. Reid LM, O'Donnell CP, Downey G. 2006. Recent technological advances for the determination of food authenticity. Trends Food Sci Tech, 17(7), 344-353
  4. Yılmaz E, Öğütcü M. 2012. Yakın kızılötesi spektroskopisi (NIR) tekniğinin yemeklik yağ sektöründeki kullanımları. Dünya Gıda, 7, 34-39
  5. Ertugay M, Başlar M. 2011. Gıdaların kalite özelliklerinin belirlenmesinde yakın kızılötesi (NIR) spektroskopisi. GIDA, 1(36), 49-54
  6. Christy AA, Kasemsumran S, Du Y, Ozakı Y. 2004. The detection and quantişcation of adulteration in olive oil by near-infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics. Anal Sci, 20(6), 935-940
  7. Miralbes C. 2008. Discrimination of European wheat varieties using near infrared reşectance spectroscopy. Food Chem, 106(1), 386-389
  8. Ding H, Xu R. 2000. Near-infrared spectroscopic technique for detection of beef hamburger adulteration. J Agric Food Chem, 48(6), 2193-2198
  9. Zhu X, Li S, Shan Y, Zhang Z, Li G, Su D, Liu F. 2010. Detection of adulterants such as sweeteners materials in honey using near-infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics. J Food Eng, 101(1), 92-97
  10. León L, Kelly JD, Downey G. 2005. Detection of apple juice adulteration using near-infrared transşectance spectroscopy. Appl spectrosc, 59(5), 593-599
  11. Reid LM, Woodcock T, O’Donnell CP, Kelly JD, Downey G. 2005. Differentiation of apple juice samples on the basis of heat treatment and variety using chemometric analysis of MIR and NIR data. Food Res Int, 38(10), 1109-1115
  12. Kılıc GB, Karahan AG, 2010. Fourier dönüşümlü kızılötesi (FTIR) spektroskopisi ve laktik asit bakterilerinin tanısında kullanılması. GIDA, 35(6), 445-452
  13. Al-Jowder O, Kemsley E, Wilson RH. 2002. Detection of adulteration in cooked meat products by mid-infrared spectroscopy. J Agric Food Chem, 50(6), 1325-1329
  14. Camps C, Robic R, Bruneau M, Laurens F. 2010. Rapid determination of soluble solids content and acidity of Black currant (Ribes nigrum L.) juice by mid-infrared spectroscopy performed in series. LWT - Food Sci Technol, 43(7), 1164-1167
  15. Holland J, Kemsley E, Wilson R. 1998. Use of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and partial least squares regression for the detection of adulteration of strawberry purees. J Sci Food Agric, 76(2), 263-269