Journals / Türkiye'de Lösemi Lenfoma Miyelom Araştırmaları / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

The Outcomes of Splenectomy and Drug Therapy in Patients with Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma

Splenik Marjinal Zon Lenfoma Tanılı Hastalarda Splenektomi ve İlaç Tedavisinin Sonuçları

Pages
10–13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The probability of three year-overall survival was %92.3 ± 7.4.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) is a rare B-cell malignancy, with no standard treatment other than splenectomy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and Methods: Between 2008 and 2018, we analyzed a total of 56 patients being considered as appropriate diagnostic criteria for SMZL in our hematology clinic.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The probability of three year-overall survival was %92.3 ± 7.4.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) is a rare B-cell malignancy, with no standard treatment other than splenectomy. The aim of this retrospective single-center study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and prognosis of SMZL. Patients and Methods: Between 2008 and 2018, we analyzed a total of 56 patients being considered as appropriate diagnostic criteria for SMZL in our hematology clinic. There were 36 (69%) female and 16 (31%) male patients. Median age was 58.8 years (range, 37-88 years). The median time of follow-up was 36.5 months (range, 3-116 months). Results: We retrospectively assessed 56 patients from single center, who received splenectomy, either alone or with chemotherapy. The presence of splenomegaly (95.2%) was recorded as the most frequent symptom at diagnosis. Of the patients, 46 (82.1%) had bone marrow involvement and 11 (19.6%) had lymph nodes involvement. Obviously, 20 patients underwent splenectomy. In 7 (12.5%) patients chemotherapy was received apart from splenectomy. The number of patients reaching clinical complete remission after splenectomy w/wo therapy was 13 (23.2%) and partial remission 11 (55%). The probability of three year-overall survival was %92.3 ± 7.4. Conclusion: In conclusion, although the options of new treatment modality in SMZL have been debated today, splenectomy seems to be safe and effective in controlling long-term disease.

Özet

Amaç: Splenik marjinal zon lenfoma (SMZL), nadir görülen B hücreli malignitelerden biri olupsplenektomi dışında standart bir tedavisi bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, tek merkezdetakip edilen SMZL hastalarının klinik özelliklerini ve prognozu değerlendirmektedir.Hastalar ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmaya, 2008-2018 yılları arasında Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp FakültesiHematoloji Bilim Dalında SMZL tanısı alan hastalardan üç aylık takip verileri tam olan 56 hastadahil edildi. Hastaların 36 (%69)’sı kadın, 16 (%31)’sı erkek olup medyan yaş 58.8 yıl (aralık: 36-88yıl) olarak bulundu. Çalışmaya dahil edilen hastalar medyan 36.5 ay (aralık 3-116 ay) takip edildi.Bulgular: Hastaların %95.2’sinde tanı sırasında splenomegali tespit edilmiştir. Hastaların 46(%82.1)’sında kemik iliği infiltrasyonu, 11 (%19.6)’inde ise lenfadenopati varlığı görülmüştür.Hastaların ilk sıra almış olduğu tedaviler değerlendirildiğinde; 25 (%44.6) hastaya sitotoksikkemoterapi, 20 (%35.7) hastaya splenektomi, 3 (%5.4) hastaya rituksimab monoterapisi yapılırken,bir hasta tedavisiz takip edilmiştir. Toplam 7 (%12.5) hastaya ise kemoterapi kürlerinin herhangibir zamanında splenektomi yapılmıştır. Sitotoksik kemoterapi verilen 25 hastanın; 11 (%44)’indetam yanıt (TY), 8 (%32)’inde kısmi yanıt (KY), 6 (%24)’sında stabil hastalık (SH) elde edilmiştir; tümtedavi oranı (ORR) %76’dır. Çalışmaya dahil edilen hastaların üç yıllık tüm sağkalım (OS) ve progresyonsuzsağkalım (PFS) oranları sırasıyla; %92.3 ± 7.4 ve %87.2 ± 8.6’dır. Hastalara splenektomiyapılmasının OS ve PFS üzerine etkisinin olmadığı görülmüştür (p= 0.48, p= 0.21).Sonuç: Splenektomi, splenomegaliye bağlı semptomları olan hastalarda ilaç tedavisi ile birliktedeğerlendirildiğinde yüksek yanıt oranları ile iyi bir seçenek gibi görünmektedir. Ancak SMZLyeni tanılı hastalarda ilk basamakta kullanılacak en etkili tedaviyi belirlemek için geniş hastasayısı içeren, randomize kontrollü çalışmaların planlanması gerekmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEVAL, G. C., TOPÇUOĞLU, P., ARSLAN, Ö., GÜRMAN, G., ÖZCAN, M., KUZU, I. (2020). The Outcomes of Splenectomy and Drug Therapy in Patients with Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma. Türkiye'de Lösemi Lenfoma Miyelom Araştırmaları, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 10–13. https://ajindex.com/articles/394624

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Liu L, Wang H, Chen Y, Rustveld L, Liu G, Du XL. Splenic marginal zone lymphoma: a population-based study on the 2001-2008 incidence and survival in the United States. Leuk Lymphoma 2013;54(7):1380-6
  2. Zuckerman E, Zuckerman T, Levine AM, Douer D, Gutekunst K, Mizokami M, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Ann Intern Med 1997;127(6):423-8
  3. Benavente Y, Mbisa G, Labo N, Casabonne D, Becker N, Maynadie M, et al. Antibodies againstlytic and latent Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpes virusantigens and lymphoma in the European EpiLymphcase-control study. Br J Cancer 2011;105(11):1768-71
  4. Hermine O, Lefrere F, Bronowicki JP, Mariette X, Jondeau K, Eclache-Saudreau V, et al. Regression ofsplenic lymphoma with villous lymphocytes after treatment of hepatitis C virus infection. N Engl J Med 2002;347(2):89-94
  5. Tsimberidou AM, Catovsky D, Schlette E, O’Brien S, Wierda WG, Kantarjian H, et al. Outcomes in patients with splenic marginal zone lymphoma and marginal zone lymphoma treated with rituximab with or without chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone. Cancer 2006;107(1):125-35
  6. Else M, Marin-Niebla A, de la Cruz F, Batty P, Ríos E, Dearden CE, et al. Rituximab, used alone or in combination, is superior to other treatment modalities in splenic marginal zone lymphoma. Br J Haematol 2012;159(3):322-8
  7. Lenglet J, Traulle C, Mounier N, Benet C, Munoz-Bongrand N, Amorin S, et al. Long-term follow-up analysis of 100 patients with splenic marginal zone lymphoma treated with splenectomy as first-line treatment. Leuk Lymphoma 2014;55(8):1854-60
  8. Starr AG, Caimi PF, Fu P, Massoud MR, Meyerson H, Hsi ED, et al. Splenic marginal zone lymphoma: excellent outcomes in 64 patients treated in the rituximab era. Hematology 2017;22(7):405-11
  9. Swedlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, et al. WHO Classification of Tumors of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Lyon: IARC Press, 2008
  10. Thieblemont C, Felman P, Berger F, Dumontet C, Arnaud P, Hequet O, et al. Treatment of splenic marginal zone B-cell lymphoma: an analysis of 81 patients. Clin Lymphoma 2002;3(1):41-7
  11. Xing KH, Kahlon A, Skinnider BF, Connors JM, Gascoyne RD, Sehn LH, et al. Outcomes in splenic marginal zone lymphoma: analysis of 107 patients treated in British Columbia. Br J Haematol 2015;169(4):520-7
  12. Perrone S, D’Elia GM, Annechini G, Ferretti A, Tosti ME, Foà R, et al. Splenic marginal zone lymphoma: prognostic factors, role of watch and wait policy, and