Journals / Öneri Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 57

THE CONSTRUCTION OF NEOLIBERAL HEGEMONY IN THE GLOBAL GOVERNANCE OF MIGRATION AND REFUGEES

DÜZENSİZ GÖÇ VE MÜLTECİ HAREKETLERİNİN YÖNETİMİNDE NEOLİBERAL HEGEMONYA ARAYIŞLARI

Pages
468–491
Publication Date
2022-01-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study contends that these recent developments reveal the attempts of a transnational historic bloc to establish neoliberal hegemony in global governance of migration and refugee movements.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article examines the “Global Compact on Refugees” and the “Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration”, adopting a Neo-Gramscian International Political Economy perspective.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Both products of the United Nations New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants, these two non-binding agreements aim to restructure global governance of migration and refugees in accordance with neoliberal ideology.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study contends that these recent developments reveal the attempts of a transnational historic bloc to establish neoliberal hegemony in global governance of migration and refugee movements.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Güvenli Sistemli ve Düzenli Göç için Küresel Mutabakat · Mültecilere İlişkin Küresel Mutabakat · Neoliberal hegemonya

Abstract

This article examines the “Global Compact on Refugees” and the “Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration”, adopting a Neo-Gramscian International Political Economy perspective. Both products of the United Nations New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants, these two non-binding agreements aim to restructure global governance of migration and refugees in accordance with neoliberal ideology. Following the global compacts, transnational capital has become one of the leading actors in the design and implementation of the international refugee protection regime. This study contends that these recent developments reveal the attempts of a transnational historic bloc to establish neoliberal hegemony in global governance of migration and refugee movements.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Birleşmiş Milletler Mülteciler ve Göçmenler için New York Bildirisinin ardından uluslararası göç ve mülteci hareketlerinin yönetimine yönelik olarak hayata geçirilen “Güvenli, Sistemli ve Düzenli Göç için Küresel Mutabakat” ve “Mültecilere İlişkin Küresel Mutabakat” isimli iki çok taraflı düzenlemeyi Yeni- Gramşiyan (Neo-Gramscian) Uluslararası Politik Ekonomi kuramı ışığında değerlendirmektedir. Bu mutabakatlar, küresel göç yönetişimi ve uluslararası mülteci koruma rejimini neoliberal ideoloji ekseninde yeniden şekillendirmektedir. Küresel mutabakatların ardından ulusötesi sermaye, göçmen ve mültecilere yönelik küresel politikaların karar ve uygulama aşamalarında belirleyici rol oynayan aktörlerden biri haline gelmiştir. Çalışmada, göç ve mülteci hareketlerinin yönetimi alanında yaşanan dönüşümün küreselleşmenin bugünkü aşamasında ortaya çıkan ulusötesi bir tarihsel bloğun neoliberal hegemonya arayışı olarak değerlendirilmesinin doğru olacağı öne sürülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TEKİN, B. Ç., TEKİN, B. (2022). THE CONSTRUCTION OF NEOLIBERAL HEGEMONY IN THE GLOBAL GOVERNANCE OF MIGRATION AND REFUGEES. Öneri Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 57, 468–491. https://ajindex.com/articles/394588

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Akçoraoğlu, A. (2017). Avrupa Birliği’nde Neo-Liberal Hegemonya, Otoriter Neo-Liberalizm ve Neo-Gramsciyen Uluslararası Politik İktisat Teorisi. Alternatif Politika, 9(1), 1-34.
  2. Allinson, K., Erdunast, E., Guild, E., & Basaran, T.(2019).The Legal Status of the UN’s Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration in International and UK Law”, Refugee Law Initiative, GCM Commentary, 31 Ocak 2019, https://rli.blogs.sas.ac.uk/2019/01/31/gcm-commentary-the-legal-status/
  3. Baban, F., Ilcan, S., & Rygiel, K. (2017). Syrian refugees in Turkey: Pathways to precarity, differential inclusion, and negotiated citizenship rights. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43(1), 41-57.
  4. Baldwin, Robert (2013) “Global supply chains: why they emerged, why they matter, and where they are going”, in D. Elms and P. Low (eds): Global Value Chains in a Changing World. WTO Publications, Geneva. (ss. 13-61)
  5. Betts, A., & Collier, P. (2015). Help refugees help themselves: Let displaced Syrians join the labor market. Foreign Affairs, 94(6), 84-92.
  6. Betts, A., & Collier, P. (2017). Refuge: Transforming a broken refugee system. Penguin UK. Bieler, A. & Morton A. D. (2004).
  7. A Critical Theory Route to Hegemony, World Order and Historical Change: Neo-Gramscian Perspectives in International Relations. Capital & Class, 28(1), 85-113.
  8. Caro, L. P. (2020). Syrian Refugees in the Turkish Labour Market. ILO Office in Turkey. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---europe/---ro-geneva/---ilo-ankara/documents/publication/wcms_738602.pdf
  9. Chimni, B. S. (2018). Global compact on refugees: One step forward, two steps back. International Journal of Refugee Law, 30(4), ss. 630-634.
  10. Cox, R. W. (1981). Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations theory. Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 126-155.
  11. Cox, R. W. (1983) “Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method. Millennium: Journal of International Studies,12(2), 162-175.
  12. Cox, R. W. (1987).
  13. Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History. New York: Columbia University Press.
  14. Cox, R. W. (1993). Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: An essay in method. In S. Gill (Ed.), Cambridge studies in international relations: Vol. 26. Gramsci, historical materialism and international relations (pp. 49–66). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Cox, R., & Schechter, M. G. (2003). The political economy of a plural world: critical reflections on power, morals and c