SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Şarkiyat / 2021 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3

ETHNOGRAPHİC NOTE-TAKİNG STRATEGİES İN THE FİELD: ON REFLEXİVİTY AND THE REFİNEMENT OF TEXT CONSTRUCTİON

SAHADA ETNOGRAFİK NOT ALMA STRATEJİLERİ: DÜŞÜNÜMSELLİK VE METİN İNŞA ETMENİN İNCELİKLERİ ÜZERİNE

Şevket Burak IŞIK
Fuat GÜLLÜPINAR
Journal
Şarkiyat
Pages
1159–1175
Publication Date
2021-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the rich and multi-layered environment of ethnographic research, this study also questions the positionality and reflexivity styles that each researcher will apply while texturizing their unique field experiences.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study focuses on the refinement and strategies of writing field notes and constructing texts, which are one of the crucial elements of conducting ethnographic research.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This article aims to provide a perspective and explanation of some of the strategic steps involved in the experience of writing fieldnotes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the rich and multi-layered environment of ethnographic research, this study also questions the positionality and reflexivity styles that each researcher will apply while texturizing their unique field experiences.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Etnografi · alan notu · konumsallık

Abstract

This study focuses on the refinement and strategies of writing field notes and constructing texts, which are one of the crucial elements of conducting ethnographic research. This article aims to provide a perspective and explanation of some of the strategic steps involved in the experience of writing fieldnotes. In this context, while conducting an ethnographic study, focusing on a research context by reaching the field, fulfilling the role of participant-observer properly, and especially transforming ethnographic experiences and observations into a written explanation, the codes of the textualization process were analyzed. In the rich and multi-layered environment of ethnographic research, this study also questions the positionality and reflexivity styles that each researcher will apply while texturizing their unique field experiences.

Özet

Bu çalışma, etnografik bir araştırma yürütmenin en önemli unsurlarından birisi olan saha notları yazmanın ve metin inşa etmenin incelikleri ve stratejilerinin neler olabileceği üzerine odaklanmıştır. Bu kapsamda makale, alan notları yazma deneyimine ilişkin bazı stratejik adımlar hakkında açıklamalar ve bir perspektif sunmayı hedeflemiştir. Etnografik bir çalışma yürütürken, sahaya ulaşarak bir araştırma bağlamına odaklanma, katılımcı gözlemci rolünü layıkıyla yerine getirme ve özellikle etnografik deneyimleri ve gözlemleri yazılı bir açıklamaya dönüştürme yani metinselleştirme sürecinin şifreleri analiz edilmiştir. Etnografik araştırmanın zengin ve çok katmanlı ortamında, her bir araştırmacının kendi özgün saha deneyimlerini metinselleştirirken, başvuracakları konumsallık ve düşünümsellik tarzlarını da sorgulayan bu çalışma, saha notları almanın araştırmacıların kendilerini keşfetme ve araştırdıkları temaları inşa süreçlerinin diyalektik olarak birbirinden ayrılamayacak süreçler olduğunu ileri sürmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

IŞIK, Ş. B., GÜLLÜPINAR, F. (2021). ETHNOGRAPHİC NOTE-TAKİNG STRATEGİES İN THE FİELD: ON REFLEXİVİTY AND THE REFİNEMENT OF TEXT CONSTRUCTİON. Şarkiyat, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3, 1159–1175. https://ajindex.com/articles/394149

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Armstrong, Gary. ‘Like that Desmond Morris?’, in D. Hobbs and T. May (eds), Interpreting the Field: Accounts of Ethnography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1993.
  2. Arnould, Eric. - Wallendorf, Melanie. Market-Oriented Ethnography: Interpretation Building and Marketing Strategy Formulation. Journal of MarketingResearch, 31/4, (1994). 484-504.
  3. Atkinson, Paul. The Clinical Experience. Farnborough: Gower. 1981.
  4. Atkinson, P.A. - Delamont, S. - Coffey, A. - Lofland, L. - Lofland H. Handbook of Ethnography. Sage. 2007.
  5. Bateson, Gregory. "Autobiographical sketch". İçinde Schaffner, B. (ed.). Group Processes: Transactions of the Fourth Conference, October. (1959). 13- 16. Bhaskar, Roy. Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation, Verso. London. 1987.
  6. Bohannan, Laura. "Dahomean Marriage: A Revaluation" Africa: Journal of the International African Institute 19/4 (1949), 273–287.
  7. Bohannan, Laura. "A Genealogical Charter" Africa: Journal of the International African Institute 22/4 (1952). 301–315
  8. Bryman, Alan. Social Research Methods. (4th Ed). Oxford University Press. 2012. Clammer John. - Giri Kumar. Philosophy and Anthropology: Border Crossing and Transformations. Anthem Press. London. 2013. Clifford James - Marcus George E. Writing culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography: a School of American Research advanced seminar. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1986.
  9. Clifford, James. On ethnographic authority. Representations 1 (1983). 118-46.
  10. Clifford, James. Partial Truths. (Edited by Clifford, J. and Marcus, G. E.), Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethograpy, Los Angeles: University of California Press. 1986a.
  11. Clifford, James. On Ethographic Allegory. (Edited by Clifford, J. and Marcus, G. E.), Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethograpy, Los Angeles: University of California Press. 1986b.
  12. Clifford, James. The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. 1988.
  13. Coffey, Amanda. The Ethnographic Self: Fieldwork and the Representation of Identity. 1999.
  14. DasGupta, S. Narrative medicine, narrative humility. Creative Nonfiction. (2014). 52, 6. Davies, C. A. Reflexive Ethnography; A Guide to Researching Selves and Others. Routledge. 1999.
  15. Davis, M. S. That's interesting. Philosophy ofSocial Science (1). (1971). 309-44.
  16. Delamont, Sara. Ethnographic Fieldnotes: The Foundations of Ethnography. In P. Atkinson, S. Delamont, A. Cernat, J.W. Sakshaug, & R.A. Williams (Eds.), SAGE Research Methods. 2019. Foundations. https://w