Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Sayı: 52

Investigation of the Nature of Science Themes in Seventh Grade Science Textbooks: Force And Energy Unıt

Yedinci Sınıf Fen Bilimleri Ders Kitaplarında Bilimin Doğası Temalarının İncelenmesi: Kuvvet Ve Enerji Ünitesi

Pages
392–411
Publication Date
2021-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded that the two books examined indirectly support teaching the nature of science.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Textbooks are an important and frequently used material in teaching.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, it is aimed to examine the nature of science themes of the Force and Energy unit in the 7th grade science books given in EBA which are taught as a 2019-2020 education-training textbook.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded that the two books examined indirectly support teaching the nature of science.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2019-2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:bilimin doğası · fen öğretimi · ders kitapları

Abstract

Textbooks are an important and frequently used material in teaching. In this study, it is aimed to examine the nature of science themes of the Force and Energy unit in the 7th grade science books given in EBA which are taught as a 2019-2020 education-training textbook. Document analysis method, one of the Analytical Research methods, was applied in the research.In the research, the data were collected with the rubric prepared by taking into account the nine nature of science theme given by Niaz and Maza (2011). It was determined that the nature of science themes in the Force and Energy unit were not sufficiently represented in the reviewed books.. The most emphasized themes are that "observations are theory-laden" and "scientific knowledge is based on experimental observation and reasoning". It has been determined that the place of theories in science, scientific method, and the difference of laws and theories are not mentioned in either of the books. It was concluded that the two books examined indirectly support teaching the nature of science. It was suggested that more emphasis should be placed on these themes in science textbook writing since other titles of science textbooks also cover the nature of science themes.

Özet

Ders kitapları öğretimde önemli ve sık kullanılan bir materyaldir. Bu araştırmada ders kitabı olarak 2019-2020 eğitim-öğretim yılında okutulan ve EBA'da verilen 7. sınıf fen bilimleri kitaplarında yer alan Kuvvet ve Enerji ünitesinin bilimin doğasıyla ilgili temaları içermesi bakımından incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Analitik araştırma yöntemlerinden doküman analizi yöntemi araştırmada uygulanmıştır. Araştırmada Niaz ve Maza (2011) tarafından verilen dokuz bilimin doğası teması dikkate alınarak hazırlanan rubrik ile veriler toplanmıştır. İncelenen kitaplarda Kuvvet ve Enerji ünitesinde bilimin doğası temalarının yeterli düzeyde temsil edilmedikleri belirlenmiştir. En fazla değinilen tema gözlemlerin teori yüklü olduğu ve bilimsel bilginin deney gözlem ve akıl yürütmeye dayalı olduğu temalarıdır. Bilimde teorilerin yeri, bilimsel yöntem, yasa ve teorilerin farkı temalarına iki kitapta da hiç değinilmediği tespit edilmiştir. İncelenen iki kitabın bilimin doğasını öğretimini dolaylı olarak desteklediği sonucuna varılmıştır.Fen bilimleri ders kitaplarının diğer ünitelerinin de bilimin doğası temalarını kapsaması bakımından incelenmesi ve fen ders kitabı yazımında bu temalara daha fazla vurgu yapılması önerilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAĞIR, Ş. U., SOYLU, Ü. İ. (2021). Investigation of the Nature of Science Themes in Seventh Grade Science Textbooks: Force And Energy Unıt. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 52, 392–411. https://ajindex.com/articles/393146

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. AAAS. (1993). Science for all Americans: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
  2. Abd-El-Khalick, F. & Akerson, V.L. (2004). Learning about nature of science as conceptual change: Factors that mediate the development of preservice elementary teachers‟ views of nature of science. Science Education, 88, 785-810.
  3. Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L. & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417–436.
  4. Abd-El-Khalick, F., Waters, M. & Lee, P. (2008). Representations of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades. Journal of Researching In Science Teaching, 45 (7), 835-855.
  5. Abraham, M.R., Grzybowski, E.B., Renner, J.W., & Marek, E.A. (1992). Understanding and misunderstandings of eighth graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 105–120.
  6. Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F. & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 37(4), 295-317
  7. Akerson, V. L., Buzzelli, C. A., & Donnelly, L. A. (2008). Early childhood teachers' views of nature of science: The influence of intellectual levels, cultural values, and explicit reflective teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 45(6), 748-770.
  8. Aslan, O., Yalçın, N. & Taşar, M.F. (2009). Fen ve teknoloji öğretmenlerinin bilimin doğası hakkındaki görüsleri, Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10 (3),1-8.
  9. Aydın, S. & Tortumlu, S. (2015). The analysis of the changes in integration of nature of science into Turkish high school chemistry textbooks: is there any development? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16, 786-796
  10. Bell, R.L., Abd-El-Khalick, F, Lederman, N.G., McComas, W.F. & Matthews, M.R. (2001). The nature of science and science education: a bibliography. Science and Education, 10, 187–204.
  11. Bianchini, J.A. & Colburn, A. (2000). Teaching the nature of science through ınquiry to prospective elementary teachers: A tale of two researchers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 177- 209. Chiang-Soong, B., & Yager, R. E. (1993). Readability levels of the science textbooks most used in secondary schools. School Science and Mathematics, 93(1), 24-27.
  12. Chiappetta, E. L., Sethna, G. H. & Fillman, D.