Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2011 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3

Spinal deformiteli olgularda paraspinal yaklaşım sonuçları

Surgical results of paraspinal approach in spinal deformity cases

Pages
173–178
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, paraspinal approach can be used for long segment arthrodesis as well as deformities including lumbar spine.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In spinal deformity a midline approach to the spine is associated with increased bleeding and operation time.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Mean blood loss andmean time was 106,8cc (range; 65-200cc) and 35,1(range; 25-55 min) for paraspinal part of the surgeries respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, paraspinal approach can be used for long segment arthrodesis as well as deformities including lumbar spine.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In spinal deformity a midline approach to the spine is associated with increased bleeding and operation time. Exposure of deep muscle layers in lumbar spine leads to extensive tissue damage and blood loss. To our best knowledge there has been no study about using paraspinal approach in spinal deformity cases. Eleven patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis underwent posterior instrumentation and fusion. Paraspinal approach was used for the lumbar exposure, instrumentation and fusion. Mean blood loss andmean time was 106,8cc (range; 65-200cc) and 35,1(range; 25-55 min) for paraspinal part of the surgeries respectively. Mean correction rate of Cobb angle was 70%. In conclusion, paraspinal approach can be used for long segment arthrodesis as well as deformities including lumbar spine.

Özet

Skolyoz gibi spinal deformitelerin cerrahisinde standart olarak kullanılan orta hat yaklaşımı ciddi kas ve ligaman hasarı ve kan kaybı ile beraber seyredebilir. Bu güne kadar paraspinal yaklaşımın kısa segment artrodezlerinde veya enstrümansız dekompresyon vakalarında kullanıldığına dair yayınlar bulunsa da bu açılımın skolyoz cerrahisinde kullanımı ile ilgili bir çalışma bulunmamaktadır. Çalışmamızda adölesan idiopatik skolyozu bulunan ve posterior enstrümantasyon ile füzyon uygulanan 11 hasta dâhil edildi. Lomber bölge açılımı, enstrümantasyonu ve füzyon uygulaması için paraspinal yaklaşım kullanıldı. Paraspinal yaklaşım sırasındaki kanama miktarı ve cerrahi sure sırası ile 106,8ml ve 35,1 dakika idi. Cobb açısına göre düzelme oranı % 70 olarak hesaplandı. Sonuç olarak günümüze kadar yapılan çalışmaların dışında paraspinal yaklaşımın lomber omurgayı içine alan deformiteler gibi uzun segment artrodezi için kullanılabileceğini düşünüyoruz.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKESEN, B., BAYYURT, S., AYDINLI, U. (2011). Spinal deformiteli olgularda paraspinal yaklaşım sonuçları. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3, 173–178. https://ajindex.com/articles/393045

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Flevez E, Shultze-Balin C, Herbaux B, Dalmas S, Scherpereel P. A study of blood loss during surgery for scoliosis. Posterior approach in 319 adolescents. Cah Anesthesiol 1995; 43(5): 425-433
  2. Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Takemoto M, Ota M, Nakamura T. Paraspinal-approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar foraminal stenosis. J Neurosurg Spine 2010; 13: 500-508
  3. Kim JS, Lee HS, Moon HK, Lee HY. Surgical results of the oblique paraspinal approach in upper lumbar disc herniation and thoracolumbar junction. Neurosurgery 2009; 65(1): 95-99
  4. Modi NH, Suh SW, Hong JY, Song HS, Yang JH. Intraoperative blood loss during different stages of scoliosis surgery: a prospective study. Scoliosis 2010; 5: 1-6
  5. Olivier E, Beldame J, Slimane MO, Defives T, Dupare F. Comparison between one midline cutaneous incision and two lateral incisions in the lumbar paraspinal approach by Wiltse: a cadaver study. Surg Radiol Anat 2006; 28(5): 494-497
  6. Palmer DK, Allen JL, Williams PA, Voss AE, Jadhav V, Wu DS, Cheng WK. Multilevel MRI analysis of multifidus-longissimus cleavage planes in the lumbar spine and potential clinical applications to Wiltseʼs paraspinal approach. Spine 2011; 14 (Epub ahead of print)
  7. Ray CD. The paralateral approach to decompression for lateral stenosis and far lateral lesions of the lumbar spine. In: Watkins E, ed. Principles and Techniques in Spine Surgery. Apsen, CO: Collins, 1987; pp: 217- 227
  8. Vialle R, Court C, Khouri N, Oliver E, Miladi E, Tassin JL, Defives T, Dubousset J. Anatomical study of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 2005; 14: 366-371
  9. Vialle R, Wicart P, Drain O, Dubousset J, Court C. The Wiltse paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine revisited: an anatomic study.Clin Orthop Rel Res 2006; 445: 175-180
  10. Watkins MB. Posterolateral fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. J Bone Joint Surg 1953; 35-A: 1014-1018
  11. Weatherley RC, Emran MI, Newel MLR. A modification of the standart midline posterior approach to the intertransverse area of the lumbar spine. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2010; 92: 19-22
  12. Weiner KB, Dabbah M. Lateral lumbar disc herniations treated with a paraspinal approach: an independent assessment of longer-term outcomes. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005; 18(6): 519-521
  13. Wiltse LL and Hutchinson RH. Surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis.Clin Orthop Rel Res 1964; 35: 116-135
  14. Wiltse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH, Nelson WE. The paraspinal Sacrospinali