Journals / Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1

Repeated colonoscopy results after an unsuccessful procedure due to inadequate bowel cleansing

Pages
36–43
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is extremely important to know the risk factors before the procedure and to determine patient management accordingly.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: The aim of this study is to evaluate repeated colonoscopy results after a failed procedure due to inadequate bowel cleansing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent colonoscopy between the dates of January 2014 and December 2019 were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is extremely important to know the risk factors before the procedure and to determine patient management accordingly.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction: The aim of this study is to evaluate repeated colonoscopy results after a failed procedure due to inadequate bowel cleansing. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent colonoscopy between the dates of January 2014 and December 2019 were included in the study. Patients’ distance from the hospital, appointment times, repeated colonoscopy times, demographic data, and predictive factors were evaluated. Results: There were 522 (5.1%) patients who had failed procedure due to insufficient bowel cleansing among the 10,420 colonoscopy procedures. Failure rates were increased in each repeated colonoscopies (21.8%, 25%, and 33.3%). In repeated second colonoscopy, if the procedure was on the same day and the next day, it was associated with a high success rate (odds ratio [OR]=3.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.91–12.36; p=0.048, OR=3.22, 95% CI=1.26–8.24; p=0.011, respectively). Elder age (OR=1.04, 95% CI=1.02–1.06; p<0.001), diabetes mellitus (OR=5.23, 95% CI=2.92–9.38; p<0.001), neurologic disorders (OR=7.02, 95% CI=3.12–15.8; p<0.001), and constipation (p<0.001) were defined as risk factors for inadequate bowel cleansing. Patients who did not attend the second recurrent colonoscopy appointment had a significantly higher distance from the hospital compared to the patients who attended the appointment (p<0.001). Conclusion: The failure rates in repeated colonoscopies after inadequate bowel preparation continue exponentially. In this difficult patient group, failure rates can be reduced by repeating colonoscopy on the same day or the next day. It is extremely important to know the risk factors before the procedure and to determine patient management accordingly.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, M., ÖZSOY, U., UĞURLU, C., KOCA, B., YENİOVA, A. Ö. (2021). Repeated colonoscopy results after an unsuccessful procedure due to inadequate bowel cleansing. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1, 36–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/390096

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Parmar R, Martel M, Rostom A, Barkun AN. Validated scales for colon cleansing: A systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2016;111:197–204; quiz 205. [CrossRef] 2. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, Burnand B, Vader JP. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: The European panel of appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:378–84. [CrossRef] 3. Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Latinovich DR, Bratcher LL. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:1696–700. [CrossRef] 4. Alvarez-Gonzalez MA, Flores-Le Roux JA, Seoane A, PedroBotet J, Carot L, Fernandez-Clotet A, et al. Efficacy of a multifactorial strategy for bowel preparation in diabetic patients undergoing colonoscopy: A randomized trial. Endoscopy 2016;48:1003–9. [CrossRef] 5. Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58:76–9. [CrossRef] 6. Gimeno-García AZ, Baute JL, Hernandez G, Morales D, Gonzalez-Pérez CD, Nicolás-Pérez D, et al. Risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation: A validated predictive score. Endoscopy 2017;49:536–43. [CrossRef] 7. Borg BB, Gupta NK, Zuckerman GR, Banerjee B, Gyawali CP. Impact of obesity on bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;7:670–5. [CrossRef] 8. Chan WK, Saravanan A, Manikam J, Goh KL, Mahadeva S. Appointment waiting times and education level influence the quality of bowel preparation in adult patients undergoing colonoscopy. BMC Gastroenterol 2011;11:86. [CrossRef] 9. Hassan C, East J, Radaelli F, Spada C, Benamouzig R, Bisschops R, et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) guideline update 2019. Endoscopy 2019;51:775–94. [CrossRef] 10. Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, Giardiello FM, Johnson DA, Levin TR. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: A consensus update by the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2012;143:844–57. [CrossRef] 11. Johnson DA, Barkun AN, Cohen LB, Dominitz JA, Kaltenbach T, Martel M, et al. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: Recommendations from the US multi- -society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2014;147:903–24. [CrossRef] 12. Akgul G, Ozgur Yeniova A, Ozsoy Z, Yenidogan E, Kefeli A, Dasıran MF, et al. Effect and