Journals / MN Kardiyoloji / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3

Relationship Between Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio and Coronary Slow Flow in Diabetic Patients

Diyabetik Hastalarda Nötrofil/Lenfosit Oranı ve Trombosit/ Lenfosit Oranı ile Koroner Yavaş Akım Arasındaki İlişki

Pages
131–138
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our findings support the possible role of inflammation in coronary slow flow physiopathology in patients with diabetes mellitus.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The coronary slow flow phenomenon has been defined as angiographically normal coronary arteries and also delayed filling of the distal coronary artery bed with contrast agent.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: 112 diabetic patients with coronary slow flow and 112 diabetic patients with normol coronary arteries were in‐ cluded in the study as a control group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our findings support the possible role of inflammation in coronary slow flow physiopathology in patients with diabetes mellitus.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The coronary slow flow phenomenon has been defined as angiographically normal coronary arteries and also delayed filling of the distal coronary artery bed with contrast agent. Diabetes mellitus and chronic inflammation have been shown to cause the de‐ velopment of coronary slow flow. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between neutrophil‐lymphocyte ratio and platelet‐lymphocyte ratio, which are markers of inflammation, with the presence of coronary slow flow in diabetic patients. Material and Method: 112 diabetic patients with coronary slow flow and 112 diabetic patients with normol coronary arteries were in‐ cluded in the study as a control group. Neutrophil‐lymphocyte ratio and platelet‐lymphocyte ratio values were compared between groups, and regression analysis was performed to investigate the relationship between coronary slow flow and platelet‐lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil‐lymphocyte ratio. Results: Platelet‐lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil‐lymphocyte ratio values were significantly higher in diabetic patients with coronary slow flow (p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that neutrophil‐lymphocyte ratio and platelet‐lymphocyte ratio are the independent predictors for coronary slow flow in diabetic patients. Conclusions: This study demonstrated an association between coronary slow flow and platelet‐lymphocyte ratio‐neutrophil‐lymphocyte ratio in diabetic patients. Our findings support the possible role of inflammation in coronary slow flow physiopathology in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Özet

Amaç: Koroner yavaş akım fenomeni, anjiyografik olarak koroner arterlerin normal olması ve aynı zamanda distal koroner arter yata‐ ğının kontrast madde ile doluşunun gecikmesi olarak tanımlanmıştır. Diabetes mellitus ve kronik inflamasyonun koroner yavaş akım ge‐ lişimine neden olduğu gösterilmiştir. inflamasyon belirteçleri olan nötrofil‐lenfosit oranının ve trombosit‐lenfosit oranının diyabetik has‐ talarda koroner yavaş akım ile ilişkisini değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Koroner yavaş akım tespit edilen 112 diyabetik hasta ile 112 normal koroner arterlere sahip diyabet hastası kontrol gurubu olarak çalışmaya dahil edildi. Nötrofil‐lenfosit oranı ve trombosit‐lenfosit oranı değerleri gruplar arasında karşılaştırıldı ve koro‐ ner yavaş akım ile trombosit‐lenfosit oranı ve nötrofil‐lenfosit oranı arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmak için regresyon analizi yapıldı. Bulgular: Diyabetik koroner yavaş akım olan hastalarda trombosit‐lenfosit oranı ve nötrofil‐lenfosit oranı değerleri anlamlı olarak daha yüksekti (p <0,001). Çok değişkenli lojistik regresyon analizinde, nötrofil‐lenfosit oranı ve trombosit‐lenfosit oranı diyabetik hastalarda koroner yavaş akım için bağımsız birer prediktör olduğunu bulduk. Sonuç: Bu çalışma, diyabetik hastalarda koroner yavaş akım ile trombosit‐lenfosit oranı ve nötrofil‐lenfosit oranı arasında bir ilişki ol‐ duğunu göstermiştir. Kesin mekanizma açıklanamasa da, bulgularımız diabetes mellituslu hastalarda koroner yavaş akım fizyopatoloji‐ sinde inflamasyonun olası rolünü desteklemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

EREN, H., İNANIR, M. (2021). Relationship Between Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio and Coronary Slow Flow in Diabetic Patients. MN Kardiyoloji, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3, 131–138. https://ajindex.com/articles/388823

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Tambe AA. Demany MA. Zimmerman HA. Mascarenhas E. Angina pectoris and slow flow velocity of dye in coronary arteries­a new angiographic finding. Am Heart J. 1972; 84(1):66­71
  2. Xia S. Deng SB. Wang Y. Xiao J. Du JL. Zhang Y. et al. Clinical analysis of the risk factors of slow coronary flow. Heart Vessels. 2011;26(5):480­6
  3. Voelker W. Euchner U. Dittmann H. Karsch KR. Long­term clinical course of patients with angina and angiographically normal coronary arteries. Clin Cardiol. 1991;14(4):307­11. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960140405
  4. Harrison DG. Endothelial dysfunction in the coronary microcirculation: A new clinical entity or an experimental finding? J Clin Invest. 1993;91(1):1­2
  5. Cosentino F. Luscher TF. Endothelial dysfunction in diabetes mellitus. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1998;32 (Suppl 3): S54­61
  6. Akpinar I. Sayin MR. Gursoy YC. Aktop Z. Karabag T. Kucuk E. et al. Plateletcrit and red cell distribution width are independent predictors of the slow coronary flow phenomenon. J Cardiol. 2014;63(2):112­8. doi: 10.1016/ j.jjcc.2013.07.010 7. Turhan H. Saydam GS. Erbay AR. Ayaz S. Yasar AS. Aksoy Y. et al. Increased plasma soluble adhesion molecules; ICAM1. VCAM­1. and E­selectin levels in patientswith slowcoronary flow. Int J Cardiol. 2006;108(2):224­30
  7. Ertürk M. Sürgi̇t Ö. Yalçın A. et al. Nötrofil/Lenfosit oranı ile yavaş koroner akım arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Dicle Tıp Derg. 2013;40(4):537­42
  8. Çetin M. Kiziltunc E. Elalmış ÖU. et al. Predictive Value of Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients with Coronary Slow Flow. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2016;32(3):307­12
  9. Zahorec R. Ratio of neutrophil to lymphocyte counts­­ rapid and simple parameter of systemic inflammation and stress in critically ill. Bratislavske lekarske listy. 2001; 102(1):5­14
  10. Mertoglu C. Gunay M. Neutrophil­Lymphocyte ratio and Platelet­Lymphocyte ratio as useful predictive markers of prediabetes and diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2017;11 Suppl 1:S127­31
  11. Liu N. Sheng J. Pan T. Wang Y. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio are associated with lower extremity vascular lesions in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. Clin Lab. 2019;65(3). doi: 10.7754/Clin. Lab.2018.180804
  12. Quinones MA. Otto CM. Stoddard M. Waggoner A. Zoghbi WA. Doppler Quantifi cation Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards of the American Society of Echocardigraphy. Recommendationsfor quantifi cation of Doppler echocardi