Journals / Reforma / 2021 / Sayı: 90

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NON PERFORMING LOAN DETERMINANTS IN GERMAN AND KYRGYZ BANKING SECTORS

ALMANYA VE KIRGIZİSTAN BANKACILIK SEKTÖRLERİNDE TAKİPTEKİ KREDİ ORANLARI BELİRLEYİCİLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRMALI ANALİZİ

Journal
Reforma
Pages
44–59
Publication Date
2021-08-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The empirical model results show that while industrial production, labor cost and oil price inflation have diminishing effects, economic growth, treasury bond rate and crisis dummy variable have increasing effects on the probability of default in the German banking sector.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it is aimed to make a comprehensive literature review and determine the macroeconomic factors of non-performing loans in German and Kyrgyz banking sectors in 1999Q1-2020Q3.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The empirical model results show that while industrial production, labor cost and oil price inflation have diminishing effects, economic growth, treasury bond rate and crisis dummy variable have increasing effects on the probability of default in the German banking sector.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, whereas exchange rates, loan interest rate, credit growth and net remittances have decreasing effects, economic growth, inflation rate and trade balance have rising effects on the probability of default in Kyrgyz banking sector.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:takipteki kredi oranı · Almanya ve Kırgızistan bankacılık sektörü · ekonometrik model sonuçları

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to make a comprehensive literature review and determine the macroeconomic factors of non-performing loans in German and Kyrgyz banking sectors in 1999Q1-2020Q3. The empirical model results show that while industrial production, labor cost and oil price inflation have diminishing effects, economic growth, treasury bond rate and crisis dummy variable have increasing effects on the probability of default in the German banking sector. Furthermore, whereas exchange rates, loan interest rate, credit growth and net remittances have decreasing effects, economic growth, inflation rate and trade balance have rising effects on the probability of default in Kyrgyz banking sector.

Özet

Bu çalışmada makro stres testi ile ilgili detaylı bir literatür taraması yapılmış ve 1999ç1-2020ç3 döneminde Alman ve Kırgız bankacılık sektöründe takipteki kredi oranlarının makroekonomik belirleyicileri tespit edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Ampirik model bulguları sonucunda Alman bankacılık sektöründe endüstriyel üretim, emek maliyeti ve petrol fiyatı enflasyonu temerrüt olasılığını azaltıcı etki yaparken, ekonomik büyüme, hükümet tahvili faiz oranı ve kriz kukla değişkeninin ise temerrüt olasılığını artırıcı etki yaptığı tespit edilmiştir. Kırgız bankacılık sektöründe ise döviz kurları, kredi faiz oranı, kredi büyümesi ile net işçi dövizleri temerrüt olasılığını azaltırken, ekonomik büyüme, enflasyon oranı ile ticaret haddi temerrütleri azalttığı gösterilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

MADMAROV, N., ABASIZ, T., ÇETİNTAŞ, H. (2021). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NON PERFORMING LOAN DETERMINANTS IN GERMAN AND KYRGYZ BANKING SECTORS. Reforma, Sayı: 90, 44–59. https://ajindex.com/articles/388011

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Cıhák, M. Stress Testing of Banking Systems // Czech Journal of Economics and Finance. – 2005. - No.55 – P. 418-440.
  2. Naimy, V. Y. Stress Tests and VaR Analysis in the Process of Risk Management // Journal of Business and Financial Affairs. – 2012. – No.1(3). - DOI: 10.4172/2167-0234.1000e114 Alexander, C. and Sheedy, E. Model-Based Stress Tests: Linking Stress Tests to VaR for Market Risk // Macquarie University Applied Finance Centre. – 2008.
  3. Akkaya, G. C., Tükenmez N.M., Kutay N. & Kabakçı A. Pazar Risk Modeli: Bir Riske Maruz Değer ve Stres Testi Uygulaması // Ege Akademik BakışDergisi. – 2008. - No.8. – P. 813-821.
  4. Lopez, J. A. Stress Tests: Useful Complements to Financial Risk Models // Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Economic Letter. – 2005.
  5. Foglia, A. Stress Testing Credit Risk: A Survey of Authoririties' Approaché // International Journal of Central Banking. – 2009.
  6. Van den End, J. W., Hoeberichts, M. & Tabba M. Modelling Scenario Analysis and Macro Stress-Testing // De Nederlandsche Bank Working Paper. – 2006. - No.119. NBKR. NBKR bülteni [Elektronik kaynak]. - 2021. - https://www.nbkr.kg/index1.jsp?item=137&lang=ENG Saint Louis Merkez Bankası internet sitesi adresi [Elektronik kaynak]. - https://fred.stlouisfed.org/
  7. Wilson, T. C. Portfolio Credit Risk //FRBNY Economic Policy Review. – 1998. - No.4(3). – P. 71-82. 10., 19. Wilson, T. C. Portfolio Credit Risk I // Risk Magazine. – 1997a. – No.10(9). – P. 111-117. 10., 19. Wilson, T. C. Portfolio Credit Risk II // Risk Magazine. - 1997b - No.10(10) – P. 56-61. Pesola. The Role of Macroeconomic Shocks in Banking Crises // Bank of Finland Discussion Paper. – 2001.
  8. Froyland, E. & Larsen, K. How Vulnerable are Financial Institutions to Macroeconomic Changes? An Analysis Based on Stress Testing // Norges Bank Economic Bulletin, Norges Bank, Oslo, 2002. – No. LXXIII (3). Hoggarth, G. & Whitley, J. Assessing the Strength of UK Banks through Macroeconomic Stress Tests // Financial Stability Review. 2003. – No.14. – P. 91-103
  9. Pesola, J. Banking Fragility and Distress: An Econometric Study of Macroeconomic Determinants // Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers, Bank of Finland, Helsinki, Finland. – 2005.
  10. Beşe, E. Finansal sistem stres testi uygulamalari ve Türkiye örneği: uzmanlık yeterlilik tezi… TCMB Bankacılık ve Finansal Kuruluslar Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara. – 2007.
  11. Jakubik, P. & Schmieder, C. Stress Testing Credit Risk: Comparison of the Czech Republic and Germany // Financial Stability Institute