SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 2

Host suitability level of selected Brassicaceae plants for Meloidogyne arenaria (Neal) and Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid & White) (Tylenchida: Meloidogynidae)

Gökhan AYDINLI
Sevilhan MENNAN
Pages
0–0
Publication Date
2016-05-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to all parameters, poor hosts might be selected to search and use for their biofumigation potentially.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Biofumigation with Brassica spp. could be an alternative method to suppress root-knot nematodes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To determine potential biofumigant plants, 40 Brassica genotypes were screened for host suitability level to Meloidogyne arenaria (Neal) and Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid & White) in pot experiments in 2010 and 2011.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to all parameters, poor hosts might be selected to search and use for their biofumigation potentially.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Brassica spp. · Meloidogyne arenaria · Meloidogyne incognita

Özet

Biofumigation with Brassica spp. could be an alternative method to suppress root-knot nematodes. It is important to select poor or non-host Brassica genotypes for Meloidogyne spp. to investigate the efficiency of biofumigation. To determine potential biofumigant plants, 40 Brassica genotypes were screened for host suitability level to Meloidogyne arenaria (Neal) and Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid & White) in pot experiments in 2010 and 2011. Seedlings of each genotype were inoculated with 2000 or 0 root-knot nematode’s eggs per plant. Pots were arranged in a completely randomized block design with 5 replicate in a controlled greenhouse at 20±1°C for 60 days. Experiment was repeated once. Host suitability was based on the gall index, egg masses index and nematode developmental stage. As a result of host suitability level studies, 12 genotypes for M. incognita and 9 of these 12 genotypes for M. arenaria were found to be as poor host. According to all parameters, poor hosts might be selected to search and use for their biofumigation potentially.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDINLI, G., MENNAN, S. (2016). Host suitability level of selected Brassicaceae plants for Meloidogyne arenaria (Neal) and Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid & White) (Tylenchida: Meloidogynidae). Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 2, 0–0. https://ajindex.com/articles/386181

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Angus, J. F., A. Gardner, J. A. Kirkegaard & J. M. Desmarchelier, 1994. Biofumigation: Isothiocyanates released from Brassica roots inhibit growth of the take-all fungus. Plant and Soil, 162 (1): 107-112.
  2. Boydston, R. A. & A. Hang, 1995. Rapeseed (Brassica napus) green manure crops suppress weeds in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technology, 9 (4): 669-675.
  3. Brown, P. D., M. J. Morra, J. P. McCaffrey, D. L. Auld & L. Williams III, 1991. Allelochemicals produced during glucosinolate degradation in soil. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 17 (10): 2021-2034.
  4. Bybd, D. W., Jr. T. Kirkpatrick & K. R. Barker, 1983. An improved technique for clearing and staining plant tissues for detection of nematodes. Journal of Nematology, 15 (1): 142-143.
  5. Curto, G., E. Dallavalle & L. Lazzeri, 2005. Life cycle duration of Meloidogyne incognita and host status of Brassicaceae and Capparaceae selected for glucosinolate content. Nematology, 7 (2): 203-212.
  6. Edwards, S. & A. Ploeg, 2014. Evaluation of 31 potential biofumigant Brassicaceous plants as hosts for three Meloiodogyne species. Journal of Nematology, 46 (3): 287-295.
  7. Fan, C. M., G. R. Xiong, P. Qi, G. H. Ji & Y. Q. He, 2008. Potential biofumigation effects of Brassica oleracea var. caulorapa on growth of fungi. Journal of Phytopathology, 156 (6): 321-325.
  8. Fourie, H., P. Ahuja, J. Lammers & M. Daneel, 2016. Brassicacea-based management strategies as an alternative to combat nematode pests: A synopsis. Crop Protection, 80: 21-41.
  9. Gardner, J. & E. P. Caswell-Chen, 1994.
  10. Raphanus sativus, Sinapis alba and Fagopyrum esculentum as hosts to Meloidogyne incognita, Meloidogyne javanica and Plasmodiophora brassicae. Journal of Nematology, 26 (4S): 756-760.
  11. Halbrendt, J. M., 1996. Allelopathy in the management of plant-parasitic nematodes. Journal of Nematology, 28 (1): 8-14.
  12. Hussey, R. S. & K. R. Barker, 1973. A comparison of methods of collecting inocula of Meloidogyne spp., including a new technique. Plant Disease Reporter, 57 (12): 1025-1028.
  13. Kaşkavalcı, G. & H. Duran Akkurt, 2012. Organik domates tarımında Kök-ur nematodları (Meloidogyne spp.)’na karşı savaşta bazı yöntemlerin birlikte kullanım etkinlikleri. Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi, 36 (3): 413-422.
  14. Khan, A. A. & M. W. Khan, 1991. Reaction of cauliflower cultivars to Meloidogyne javanica and races of Meloidogyne incognita. Nematropica, 21 (2): 161-166.
  15. King, B. A. & J. P. Taberna, 2013. Site-specific management of Meloidogyne chitwoodi in Idaho potatoes using 1,3-dichloropropene