SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Spor Bilimleri Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1

Sport Mental Health Continuum-Short Form: Turkish Adaptation and Psychometric Properties

Sporcu Ruh Sağlığı Sürekliliği-Kısa Formu: Türkçeye Uyarlanması ve Psikometrik Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi

Emre Ozan TİNGAZ
Pages
43–52
Publication Date
2022-04-14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Consequently, Sport MHC-SF is a valid and reliable measurement tool, consisting of three subscales, Sport Subjective Well-Being, Sport Psychological Well-Being, and Sport Social Well-Being, and 14 items.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the present study is to adapt the Sport Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (Sport MHC-SF) into Turkish and to examine its psychometric properties.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result of the factor analysis performed with 254 (Mage=21.96, SD=4.49) student-athletes, the goodness of fit indices were appropriate.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Consequently, Sport MHC-SF is a valid and reliable measurement tool, consisting of three subscales, Sport Subjective Well-Being, Sport Psychological Well-Being, and Sport Social Well-Being, and 14 items.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Spor · İyi oluş · Ölçek uyarlama

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to adapt the Sport Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (Sport MHC-SF) into Turkish and to examine its psychometric properties. The research was carried out in three stages: the translation of the scale into Turkish, validity and reliability. As a result of the factor analysis performed with 254 (Mage=21.96, SD=4.49) student-athletes, the goodness of fit indices were appropriate. The Mental Health Continuum Short Form, which was included for the convergent validity study, was moderately positively correlated with Sport MHC-SF. The item-total correlations were moderate and strong, and the Spearman-Brown split-half correlation result was fairly high. Sport MHC-SF (α=.922), Sport Subjective Well-Being (α=.833), Sport Social Well Being (α=.857), and Sport Psychological Well-Being (α=.857) subscales demonstrated fairly high internal consistency. Two-weeks interval test-retest reliability showed that the scale was consistent over time. Consequently, Sport MHC-SF is a valid and reliable measurement tool, consisting of three subscales, Sport Subjective Well-Being, Sport Psychological Well-Being, and Sport Social Well-Being, and 14 items.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Sporcu Ruh Sağlığı Sürekliliği-Kısa Formu’nun (SRSS-KF) Türkçeye uyarlanması ve psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesidir. Araştırma, ölçeğin Türkçeye çevrilmesi, geçerlik ve güvenirlik olmak üzere üç aşamada yürütülmüştür. 254 (Myaş=21.96, SS=4.49) üniversiteli sporcu ile gerçekleştirilen faktör analizi sonucunda ölçeğin uyum iyiliği indekslerinin yeterli olduğu görülmüştür. Benzer ölçek geçerliği çalışması amacıyla dahil edilen Ruh Sağlığı Sürekliliği Kısa Formu, SRSS-KF ile orta düzeyde pozitif yönde ilişkilidir. Madde toplam korelasyonlarının orta ve güçlü düzeyde, Spearman-Brown iki yarım test korelasyonun oldukça yüksek olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Ölçeğin geneli (α=.922), Sporda Öznel İyi Oluş (α=.833), Sporda Sosyal İyi Oluş (α=.840) ve Sporda Psikolojik İyi Oluş (α=.857) alt ölçekleri için Cronbach’s alpha iç tutarlık katsayıları oldukça yüksektir. İki hafta aralıklı olarak uygulanan test-tekrar test sonucunda ölçeğin zamana karşı tutarlı olduğu görülmüştür. Sonuç olarak, Sporda Öznel İyi Oluş, Sporda Psikolojik İyi Oluş, Sporda Sosyal İyi Oluş olmak üzere üç alt boyutlu ve 14 maddeli SRSS-KF geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TİNGAZ, E. O. (2022). Sport Mental Health Continuum-Short Form: Turkish Adaptation and Psychometric Properties. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1, 43–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/385403

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akın, A. (2008). The scales of psychological well-being: a study of validity and reliability. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 741-750.
  2. Allen, M. (Ed.). (2017). The SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods. SAGE Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/ 9781483381411 3. Allen, M. J., ve Yen, W. M. (2001). Introduction to measurement theory. Waveland Press
  3. Bertollo, M., Forzini, F., Biondi, S., Di Liborio, M., Vaccaro, M. G., Georgiadis, E., ve Conti, C. (2021). How does a sport psychological intervention help professional cyclists to cope with their mental health during the COVID-19 lockdown?. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 699.
  4. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2020). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem
  5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  6. Comrey, A. L. ve Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. 2. bs. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  7. Demirci, I., ve Akın, A. (2015). Ruh Sağlığı Sürekliliği Kısa Formu’nun geçerliği ve güvenirliği. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 48(1), 49-64
  8. Dünya Sağlık Örgütü. (2004). Promoting mental health: concepts, emerging evidence, practice: summary report.
  9. Fonteyn, M. E., Kuipers, B. ve Grobe, S. J. (1993). A description of think aloud method and protocol analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 3(4), 430-441.
  10. Foster, B. J., ve Chow, G. M. (2019). Development of the Sport Mental Health Continuum—Short Form (Sport MHC-SF). Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 13(4), 593-608.
  11. Hardesty, D. M. ve Bearden, W. O. (2004). The use of expert judges in scale development: Implications for improving face validity of measures of unobservable constructs. Journal of Business Research, 57(2), 98-107.
  12. Houltberg, B. J., Wang, K. T., Qi, W., ve Nelson, C. S. (2018). Self-narrative profiles of elite athletes and comparisons on psychological well-being. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 89(3), 354-360.
  13. Hu, L. T., ve Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural