Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1

Reaction of Monetary policy to Cost-Push Inflation in Turkey: A Leaning against Wind?

Türkiye’de Para Politikasının Maliyet İtişli Şoklara Tepkisi: Rüzgâra Karşı Bir Duruş mu?

Pages
256–271
Publication Date
2022-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The response of monetary policy to the exchange rate implicitly leads to "a leaning against the wind".

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In Turkey, monetary policy responds to cost shocks rather than the inflation gap and output gap.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To clarify this policy, we estimate the linear and non-linear Taylor rule using the Thresold GMM for 2006:01-2020:07.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The response of monetary policy to the exchange rate implicitly leads to "a leaning against the wind".
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Enflasyon · Maliyet İtişli Şoklar · Taylor Kuralı

Abstract

In Turkey, monetary policy responds to cost shocks rather than the inflation gap and output gap. To clarify this policy, we estimate the linear and non-linear Taylor rule using the Thresold GMM for 2006:01-2020:07. The linear model estimates that the policy rate responds significantly to the inflation gap and the real effective exchange rate. The non-linear model captures that monetary policy differs in regimes where imported goods and input prices are set as high and low. In a high price regime, monetary policy also reacts to cost-push shocks. The response of monetary policy to the exchange rate implicitly leads to "a leaning against the wind".

Özet

Türkiye'de para politikası reel efektif döviz kurundaki değişmelere odaklanmakta, enflasyon açığı ve çıktı açığından ziyade maliyet şoklarına tepki vermektedir. Bu politikayı netleştirmek için, 2006:01-2020:07 için Eşik GMM kullanarak doğrusal ve doğrusal olmayan Taylor kuralı tahmin edilmektedir. Doğrusal model, politika faizinin enflasyon açığına ve reel efektif döviz kuruna önemli ölçüde tepki verdiğini tahmin etmektedir. Doğrusal olmayan model ise ithal mal ve girdi fiyatlarının yüksek ve düşük olarak ayarlandığı rejimlerde para politikasının farklılık gösterdiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Yüksek fiyat rejiminde, para politikası maliyet şoklarına da tepki vermektedir. Para politikasının döviz kuruna tepkisi örtük bir şekilde "rüzgâra karşı bir duruş" sergiliyor.

🔖

Cite This Article

TETİK, M., BARİ, B. (2022). Reaction of Monetary policy to Cost-Push Inflation in Turkey: A Leaning against Wind?. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1, 256–271. https://ajindex.com/articles/383652

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akdeniz, C., & Catik, A. N. (2019). Finansal Koşullarin Taylor Kuralinin Geçerliliği Üzerindeki Etkisi: Türkiye Üzerine Ampirik Bulgular (in Turkish). TESAM Akademi, 6, 107-126.
  2. Aklan, N., & Nargelecekenler, M. (2008). Para politikalarının banka kredi kanalı üzerindeki etkileri (in Turkish). İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, (39), 109-132.
  3. Baeriswyl, R. & Cornand, C. (2010). Optimal Monetary Policy in Response to Cost-Push Shocks: The Impact of Central Bank Communication. International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, 6(2), 31-52.
  4. Bari, B. (2020). Exchange rate and import price pass-through in Turkey. Business and Economics Research Journal, 11(3), 609- 620. Bari, B. & Adalı, Z. (2020). How Oil Prices Drive Inflation in Turkish Economy: Two Different Channels. Fiscaoeconomia, 4 (3), 705-721.
  5. Blanchard, O. & Gali, J. (2005). Real wage rigidities and the New Keynesian Model. NBER WP 11806. Bulut, U. (2016). How far ahead does the Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey look?. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 5(1), 99–111.
  6. Bulut, U. (2019). Does the Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey Respond Asymmetrically to Inflation and Output?. Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 13(4), 381-400.
  7. Calvo, G. (1983). Staggered Price Setting in a Utility Maximizing Framework. Journal of Monetary Economics, 12(3), 383–98.
  8. Caporale, G. M., Helmi, M. H., Çatık, A. N., Ali, F. M., & Akdeniz, C. (2018). Monetary policy rules in emerging countries: is there an augmented nonlinear Taylor rule?. Economic Modelling, 72, 306-319.
  9. Clarida, R., Gali, J. & Gertler, M. (1998). Monetary policy rules in practice: Some international evidence. European Economic Review, 42(6), 1033-1067.
  10. Clarida, R., Gali, J., & Gertler, M. (1999). The science of monetary policy: a new Keynesian perspective. Journal of economic literature, 37(4), 1661-1707.
  11. Clarida, R., Gali, J., & Gertler, M. (2000). Monetary policy rules and macroeconomic stability: evidence and some theory. The Quarterly journal of economics, 115(1), 147-180.
  12. Dixit, A. & Stiglitz, J. (1977). Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity. American Economic Review, 67(3), 297– 308. Erdem, E., Bulut, U., & Kocak, E. (2017). Have financial stability concerns changed the priority of the Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey? Studies in Business and Economics, 12(2), 35–45.
  13. Friedman, M. (1968) The Role of Monetary Policy. American Economic Review,