Journals / SAVSAD Savunma ve Savaş Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

Risk Management in Defense Acquisiton Projects

SAVUNMA TEDARİK PROJELERİNDE RİSK YÖNETİMİ

Pages
319–356
Publication Date
2021-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The recommendations include, but not limited to, employment of risk managemet in project management, provision of adequate information required by decision-makers at decision points, introduction of knowledge based and evolutionary acquisition strategies, and utilization of system engineering approach.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Changes in the defense ecosystem due to internal and external factors have made risk-oriented approach, which is a state-of-the-art management technique, mandatory in the management of defense acquisiton projects.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Yet, it’s observed that studies increase after 2000s.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The recommendations include, but not limited to, employment of risk managemet in project management, provision of adequate information required by decision-makers at decision points, introduction of knowledge based and evolutionary acquisition strategies, and utilization of system engineering approach.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Savunma Yönetimi · Silahlanma Planlaması · Savunma Tedariki

Abstract

Changes in the defense ecosystem due to internal and external factors have made risk-oriented approach, which is a state-of-the-art management technique, mandatory in the management of defense acquisiton projects. However, studies in the international literature have shown that risk management is not adopted by project managers as much as techniques such as work breakdown structure, scheduling or earned value management. Yet, it’s observed that studies increase after 2000s. On the other hand, studies on risk management in defense acquisiton projects are scarce in the national literature. Few studies seem to concentrate on technical risks. From this point of view, by examining the reports on the defense acquisition projects of the United States, the risks were tried to be defined and the action recommendations applied for risk mitigation were compiled. As a result, recommendations were made for the management of national defense acquisition projects in the light of the information obtained from the reviewed reports. The recommendations include, but not limited to, employment of risk managemet in project management, provision of adequate information required by decision-makers at decision points, introduction of knowledge based and evolutionary acquisition strategies, and utilization of system engineering approach.

Özet

Savunma ekosisteminde içsel ve dışsal faktörlere bağlı olarak yaşanan değişimler savunma tedarik projelerinin yönetiminde güncel bir yönetim tekniği olan risk odaklı yaklaşımı zorunlu hâle getirmiştir. Ancak, uluslararası alanyazında yer alan çalışmalar, risk yönetiminin proje yöneticileri tarafından, iş kırılım yapısı, zaman çizelgeleme ya da kazanılmış değer yönetimi gibi teknikler kadar benimsenmediğini göstermektedir. Bununla birlikte, 2000’li yıllardan itibaren bu konuda yapılan çalışmaların arttığı gözlemlenmektedir. Diğer taraftan ulusal alanyazında savunma tedarik projelerinde risk yönetimini ele alan çalışmalar yok denecek kadar azdır. Birkaç çalışmanın teknik riskler üzerinde yoğunlaştığı görülmektedir. Buradan hareketle Amerika Birleşik Devletleri savunma tedarik projelerine ilişkin raporlar incelenerek riskler tanımlanmaya ve risk azaltma için uygulanan faaliyet önerileri derlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Sonuç olarak incelenen raporlardan elde edilen bilgiler ışığında ulusal savunma tedarik projelerinin yönetimi için önerilerde bulunulmuştur. Bu öneriler içerisinde ön plana çıkanlar: proje yönetiminde risk yönetim yaklaşımının kullanılması, karar vericilere projelerin karar noktalarında ihtiyaç duydukları yeterli bilginin sağlanması, bilgi tabanlı tedarik ve evrimsel tedarik yöntemlerinin kullanılması ve sistem mühendisliği yaklaşımından istifade edilmesidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPÇU, M. K., KORKMAZ, G. (2021). Risk Management in Defense Acquisiton Projects. SAVSAD Savunma ve Savaş Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 319–356. https://ajindex.com/articles/383582

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Allen, M., Carpenter, C., Hutchins, M. ve Jones, G. (2015). Impact of risk management on project cost: An industry comparison. Journal of IT and Economic Development 6(2), 1-19.
  2. Bourne, L. ve Walker, D. H. (2006). Visualizing stakeholder influence—two Australian examples. Project Management Journal, 37(1), 5–21.
  3. Carlson, C., Groebel, D. J. ve Mettas, A. (2010). Best practices for effective reliability program plans. 2010 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. San Jose, CA,. Choi, T.M., Chiu, C.H. ve Chan, H.K. C. (2016). Risk management of logistics systems. Transportation Research Part E 90, 1-6.
  4. Cooley, W. T. ve Ruhm, B. C. (2014). A guide for DoD program managers. Defense Acquisition University. Dinç, A. (2016). Sürdürülebilir bir tedarik yönetim sistemi örneğinde, askeri turbofan motor geliştirme projelerindeki maliyet tahmin yöntemleri ve teknoloji hazırlık seviyesi tabanlı risk faktörleri. Sürdürülebilir Havacılık Araştırmaları Dergisi, C1-S1, 12-18.
  5. Eren, Ö. ve Erenel, F. (2018). The applicability of program management approach in the defense acquisition projects in order to avoid deviations. İnsan&İnsan, Yıl 5, Sayı 17, 163-193.
  6. Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N. ve Rothengatter, W. (2003). Megaprojects and risk–an anatomy of ambition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Gansler, J. S. ve Lucyshyn, W. (2005). A strategy for defense acquisition research. Research Paper, University of Maryland, Center for Public Policy and Private Enterprise. Gürkan, H. (2010). Hava Kuvvetlerinin ana savunma sistem tedarikinde proje yönetimi. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  8. GAO (2001). DOD Teaming practices not achieving potential results. United States General Accounting Office. GAO (2002a). Defense acquisition, steps to improve the crusader program’s investment decisions, GAO -02-201. Washington D.C.: Goverment Accountability Office. GAO (2002b). Capturing design and manufacturing knowledge early improves acquisition outcomes. Washington D.C.: Government Accountability Office. GAO. (2004a). Stronger management practices are needed to improve DoD's software intensive weapon acquisitions. Washington: Goverment Accountability Office. GAO (2006a). Space acquisitions: DOD needs to take more action to address unrealistic initial cost estimates of space systems, GAO-07-96. Washington: Government Accountability Office. GAO (2007). Defense acquisitions: Assessments of selected weapons programs GAO-07-406SP. Washing