Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2012 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 2

Eff ect of fermented protein feedstuff s on pig production performance, nutrient digestibility, and fecal microbes

Pages
143–151
Publication Date
2012-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed: (1) The soluble amino acids in FPFS were increased by 211% (58.06 vs. 18.68 g/kg), compared with UFPFS; (2) the average daily gain (ADG) increased (P < 0.05) in group 2, compared with the other groups; ADG in group 3 was higher than that in group 5 (P < 0.05); and (3) nutrient digestibility in the groups supplemented with FPFS was higher than in the group supplemented with UFPFS (P < 0.05).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In order to determine the availability of fermented protein feedstuffs (FPFS)-such as cottonseed, blood, and feather meals&#8212;with Aspergillus oryzae, 2 phases of feeding experiments were adopted for 7 weeks.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Sixty 58-day-old crossbred pigs were assigned to 6 groups, 10 pigs per group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed: (1) The soluble amino acids in FPFS were increased by 211% (58.06 vs. 18.68 g/kg), compared with UFPFS; (2) the average daily gain (ADG) increased (P < 0.05) in group 2, compared with the other groups; ADG in group 3 was higher than that in group 5 (P < 0.05); and (3) nutrient digestibility in the groups supplemented with FPFS was higher than in the group supplemented with UFPFS (P < 0.05).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: Pig · Aspergillus oryzae · protein feedstuffs

Abstract

In order to determine the availability of fermented protein feedstuffs (FPFS)-such as cottonseed, blood, and feather meals&#8212;with Aspergillus oryzae, 2 phases of feeding experiments were adopted for 7 weeks. Sixty 58-day-old crossbred pigs were assigned to 6 groups, 10 pigs per group. Group 1 was the control; groups 2, 3, and 4 were supplemented with 6%-7%, 12%-14%, and 18%-21% FPFS, respectively, by replacing the same percentage of soybean meal (SBM); group 5 was supplemented with 12%-14% unfermented protein feedstuffs (UFPFS) by replacing the same percentage of SBM; group 6 was on the same base as group 3 with digestive energy (DE) balanced as in group 1. The results showed: (1) The soluble amino acids in FPFS were increased by 211% (58.06 vs. 18.68 g/kg), compared with UFPFS; (2) the average daily gain (ADG) increased (P < 0.05) in group 2, compared with the other groups; ADG in group 3 was higher than that in group 5 (P < 0.05); and (3) nutrient digestibility in the groups supplemented with FPFS was higher than in the group supplemented with UFPFS (P < 0.05). The results suggest that a 6%-7% FPFS supplementation to replace SBM in pig diets would be ideal and economic.

🔖

Cite This Article

CHANG, J., YIN, Q., WANG, P., WANG, W., ZUO, R. (2012). Eff ect of fermented protein feedstuff s on pig production performance, nutrient digestibility, and fecal microbes. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 2, 143–151. https://ajindex.com/articles/382921

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Sterling, K.G., Costa, E.F., Henry, M.H., Pesti, G.M., Bakalli, R.I.: Responses of broiler chickens to cottonseed- and soybean meal-based diets at several protein levels. J. Poult. Sci., 2001; 81: 217-226.
  2. Rahma, E.H., Narasingo, R.M.S.: Gossypol removal and functional properties of protein produced by extraction of glanded cottonseed with diff erent solvents. J. Food Sci., 1984; 49: 1057-1060.
  3. Zhang, W.J., Xu, Z.R., Zhao, S.H., Sun, J.Y., Yang, X.: Development of microbial fermentation process for detoxifi cation of gossypol in cottonseed meal.Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 2007; 135: 176-186.
  4. Nagalakshmi, D., Sastry, V.R.B., Agrawal, D.K.: Detoxifi cation of undecorticated cottonseed meal by various physical and chemical methods. Anim. Nutr. Feed Technol., 2002; 2: 117-126.
  5. Moughan, P.J., Dong, G.Z., Pearson, G., Wilkinson, B.H.P.: Protein quality in blood meal. II. Th e eff ect of processing on in vivo nitrogen digestibility in rats, protein solubility and FDNB-available lysine. J. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 1999; 79: 309-320.
  6. Apple, J.K., Boger, C.B., Brown, D.C., Maxwell, C.V., Friesen, K.G., Roberts, W.J., Johnson, Z.B.: Eff ect of feather meal on live animal performance on carcass quality and composition of growing-fi nishing swine. J. Anim. Sci., 2003; 81: 172-181.
  7. Bertsch, A., Coello, N.: A biotechnological process for treatment and recycling poultry feathers as a feed ingredient. J. Bioresource Technol., 2005; 96: 1703-1708.
  8. Hong, K.J., Lee, C.H., Kim, S.W.: Aspergillus oryzae GB-107 fermentation improves nutritional quality of food soybeans and soybean meal. J. Food Med., 2004; 7: 430-436.
  9. Hachmeister, K.A., Fung, D.Y.: Tempeh: a mold-modifi ed indigenous fermented food made from soybeans and/or cereal grains. Crit. Rev. Microbiol., 1993; 19: 137-188.
  10. Feng, J., Liu, X., Xu, Z.R., Wang, Y.Z., Liu, J.X.: Eff ects of fermented soybean meal on digestive enzyme activities and intestinal morphology in broilers. J. Poult. Sci., 2007; 86: 1149-1154.
  11. Kiers, J.L., Meijer, J.C., Nout, M.J.R., Rombouts, F.M., Nabuurs, M.J.A., van der Meulen, J.: Eff ect of fermented soya beans on diarrhoea and feed effi ciency in weaned piglets. J. Appl. Microbiol., 2003; 95: 545-552.
  12. Mncene, W.B., Tuitoek, J.K., Muiruri, H.K.: Nitrogen utilization and performance of pigs given diets containing a dried or undried fermented blood/molasses mixture. Feed Sci. Technol., 1999; 78: 239-247.
  13. Sarkar, P.K., Jones, L.J., Craven, G.S., Somerset, S.M., Palmer, C.: Amino acid profi les of kin