Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2012 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 2

Effect of fermented protein feedstuffs on pig production performance, nutrient digestibility, and fecal microbes

Pages
143–151
Publication Date
2012-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed: (1) The soluble amino acids in FPFS were increased by 211% (58.06 vs. 18.68 g/kg), compared with UFPFS; (2) the average daily gain (ADG) increased (P < 0.05) in group 2, compared with the other groups; ADG in group 3 was higher than that in group 5 (P < 0.05); and (3) nutrient digestibility in the groups supplemented with FPFS was higher than in the group supplemented with UFPFS (P < 0.05).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In order to determine the availability of fermented protein feedstuffs (FPFS)-such as cottonseed, blood, and feather meals&#8212;with Aspergillus oryzae, 2 phases of feeding experiments were adopted for 7 weeks.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Sixty 58-day-old crossbred pigs were assigned to 6 groups, 10 pigs per group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed: (1) The soluble amino acids in FPFS were increased by 211% (58.06 vs. 18.68 g/kg), compared with UFPFS; (2) the average daily gain (ADG) increased (P < 0.05) in group 2, compared with the other groups; ADG in group 3 was higher than that in group 5 (P < 0.05); and (3) nutrient digestibility in the groups supplemented with FPFS was higher than in the group supplemented with UFPFS (P < 0.05).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: Pig · Aspergillus oryzae · protein feedstuffs

Abstract

In order to determine the availability of fermented protein feedstuffs (FPFS)-such as cottonseed, blood, and feather meals&#8212;with Aspergillus oryzae, 2 phases of feeding experiments were adopted for 7 weeks. Sixty 58-day-old crossbred pigs were assigned to 6 groups, 10 pigs per group. Group 1 was the control; groups 2, 3, and 4 were supplemented with 6%-7%, 12%-14%, and 18%-21% FPFS, respectively, by replacing the same percentage of soybean meal (SBM); group 5 was supplemented with 12%-14% unfermented protein feedstuffs (UFPFS) by replacing the same percentage of SBM; group 6 was on the same base as group 3 with digestive energy (DE) balanced as in group 1. The results showed: (1) The soluble amino acids in FPFS were increased by 211% (58.06 vs. 18.68 g/kg), compared with UFPFS; (2) the average daily gain (ADG) increased (P < 0.05) in group 2, compared with the other groups; ADG in group 3 was higher than that in group 5 (P < 0.05); and (3) nutrient digestibility in the groups supplemented with FPFS was higher than in the group supplemented with UFPFS (P < 0.05). The results suggest that a 6%-7% FPFS supplementation to replace SBM in pig diets would be ideal and economic.

Özet

In order to determine the availability of fermented protein feedstuffs (FPFS)-such as cottonseed, blood, and feather meals&#8212;with Aspergillus oryzae, 2 phases of feeding experiments were adopted for 7 weeks. Sixty 58-day-old crossbred pigs were assigned to 6 groups, 10 pigs per group. Group 1 was the control; groups 2, 3, and 4 were supplemented with 6%-7%, 12%-14%, and 18%-21% FPFS, respectively, by replacing the same percentage of soybean meal (SBM); group 5 was supplemented with 12%-14% unfermented protein feedstuffs (UFPFS) by replacing the same percentage of SBM; group 6 was on the same base as group 3 with digestive energy (DE) balanced as in group 1. The results showed: (1) The soluble amino acids in FPFS were increased by 211% (58.06 vs. 18.68 g/kg), compared with UFPFS; (2) the average daily gain (ADG) increased (P < 0.05) in group 2, compared with the other groups; ADG in group 3 was higher than that in group 5 (P < 0.05); and (3) nutrient digestibility in the groups supplemented with FPFS was higher than in the group supplemented with UFPFS (P < 0.05). The results suggest that a 6%-7% FPFS supplementation to replace SBM in pig diets would be ideal and economic.

🔖

Cite This Article

CHANG, J., YIN, Q., WANG, P., WANG, W., ZUO, R. (2012). Effect of fermented protein feedstuffs on pig production performance, nutrient digestibility, and fecal microbes. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 2, 143–151. https://ajindex.com/articles/121997

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Sterling, K.G., Costa, E.F., Henry, M.H., Pesti, G.M., Bakalli, R.I.: Responses of broiler chickens to cottonseedand soybean meal-based diets at several protein levels. J. Poult. Sci., 2001; 81: 217-226
  2. Rahma, E.H., Narasingo, R.M.S.: Gossypol removal and functional properties of protein produced by extraction of glanded cottonseed with diff erent solvents. J. Food Sci., 1984; 49: 1057-1060
  3. Zhang, W.J., Xu, Z.R., Zhao, S.H., Sun, J.Y., Yang, X.: Development of microbial fermentation process for detoxifi cation of gossypol in cottonseed meal. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 2007; 135: 176-186
  4. Nagalakshmi, D., Sastry, V.R.B., Agrawal, D.K.: Detoxifi cation of undecorticated cottonseed meal by various physical and chemical methods. Anim. Nutr. Feed Technol., 2002; 2: 117-126
  5. Moughan, P.J., Dong, G.Z., Pearson, G., Wilkinson, B.H.P.: Protein quality in blood meal. II. Th e eff ect of processing on in vivo nitrogen digestibility in rats, protein solubility and FDNB-available lysine. J. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 1999; 79: 309-320
  6. Apple, J.K., Boger, C.B., Brown, D.C., Maxwell, C.V., Friesen, K.G., Roberts, W.J., Johnson, Z.B.: Eff ect of feather meal on live animal performance on carcass quality and composition of growing-fi nishing swine. J. Anim. Sci., 2003; 81: 172-181
  7. Bertsch, A., Coello, N.: A biotechnological process for treatment and recycling poultry feathers as a feed ingredient. J. Bioresource Technol., 2005; 96: 1703-1708
  8. Hong, K.J., Lee, C.H., Kim, S.W.: Aspergillus oryzae GB-107 fermentation improves nutritional quality of food soybeans and soybean meal. J. Food Med., 2004; 7: 430-436
  9. Hachmeister, K.A., Fung, D.Y.: Tempeh: a mold-modifi ed indigenous fermented food made from soybeans and/or cereal grains. Crit. Rev. Microbiol., 1993; 19: 137-188 10. Feng, J., Liu, X., Xu, Z.R., Wang, Y.Z., Liu, J.X.: Eff ects of fermented soybean meal on digestive enzyme activities and intestinal morphology in broilers. J. Poult. Sci., 2007; 86: 1149-1154
  10. Kiers, J.L., Meijer, J.C., Nout, M.J.R., Rombouts, F.M., Nabuurs, M.J.A., van der Meulen, J.: Eff ect of fermented soya beans on diarrhoea and feed effi ciency in weaned piglets. J. Appl. Microbiol., 2003; 95: 545-552
  11. Mncene, W.B., Tuitoek, J.K., Muiruri, H.K.: Nitrogen utilization and performance of pigs given diets containing a dried or undried fermented blood/molasses mixture. Feed Sci. Technol., 1999; 78: 239-247
  12. Sarkar, P.K., Jones, L.J., Craven, G.S., Somerset, S.M.