SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bitki Koruma Bülteni / 2015 / Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 3

Determination of reactions of some wheat cultivars against pathogen Rhizoctonia species and anastomosis groups

Bazı buğday çeşitlerinin patojen Rhizoctonia tür ve anastomosis gruplarına karşı reaksiyonlarının belirlenmesi

Filiz ÜNAL
F. Sara DOLAR
A. Kadir AKAN
Pages
0–0
Publication Date
2015-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, all cultivars showed sensitive reaction against AG 4 which is the most virulent group.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out to determine the reactions of some wheat cultivars against Rhizoctonia solani AG 4, AG 5, AG 8, Rhizoctonia cerealis AG D, Waitea circinata var. circinata and Waitea circinata var. zeae which cause root and crown rot and stunting on wheat under controlled conditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Among the 19 wheat cultivars tested for the reaction, cv.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, all cultivars showed sensitive reaction against AG 4 which is the most virulent group.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Buğday · Rhizoctonia · anastomosis grup

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the reactions of some wheat cultivars against Rhizoctonia solani AG 4, AG 5, AG 8, Rhizoctonia cerealis AG D, Waitea circinata var. circinata and Waitea circinata var. zeae which cause root and crown rot and stunting on wheat under controlled conditions. Among the 19 wheat cultivars tested for the reaction, cv. Demir 2000 and cv. Ankara 98 were the most susceptible cultivar showing the sensitive reaction (S) against all AG groups. Cv. Cemre was the most resistant cultivar, which was also found as moderately susceptible (MS) against AG 8, AG D and W. circinata. var. circinata and moderately resistant (MR) against AG 5 and W. circinata. var. zeae. In this study, all cultivars showed sensitive reaction against AG 4 which is the most virulent group.

Özet

Bu çalışma buğdayda kök ve kök boğazı çürüklüğü ve cüceleşmeye sebep olan Rhizoctonia solani AG 4, AG 5, AG 8, Rhizoctonia cerealis AG D, Waitea circinata var. circinata ve Waitea circinata var. zeae’ye karşı bazı buğday çeşitlerinin reaksiyonlarını belirlemek amacıyla kontrollü koşullarda yürütülmüştür. Reaksiyonları araştırılan 19 buğday çeşidinden Demir 2000 ve Ankara 98 çeşidi bütün AG gruplarına hassas reaksiyon (S) göstererek en duyarlı çeşitler olmuştur. AG 8, AG D ve W. circinata. var. circinata’ya orta hassas (MS), AG 5 ve W. circinata. var. zeae’ya orta dayanıklı (MR) reaksiyon gösteren Cemre çeşidi en dayanıklı çeşit olarak tespit edilmiştir. Çalışmada en virülent grup olan AG 4’e ise tüm çeşitler hassas reaksiyon göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNAL, F., DOLAR, F. S., AKAN, A. K. (2015). Determination of reactions of some wheat cultivars against pathogen Rhizoctonia species and anastomosis groups. Bitki Koruma Bülteni, Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 3, 0–0. https://ajindex.com/articles/38147

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Aktaş H. and Bora T. 1981.Untersuchen uber die Biologie und Physiologische Varition von auf Mittelano tolischen Gersten Vorkommenden Drechslera sorokiana (Sacc.) Subram and Jain und die Reaktion der Befallenen Gersten sorten auf den Parasiten. J. Turk Phytopath., 10 (1): 1-24.
  2. Aktaş H., Bostancıoğlu H., Tunalı B. ve Bayram E. 1997. Reaction of some wheat varieties and lines against to root and foot-rot disease agents in the field and laboratory conditions. J. Turk. Phytopathology, 26(2-3), 61- 68. Aktaş H., Kınacı E.,Yıldırım A. F., Sayın L. ve Kural A. 1999. Konya yöresinde hububatta sorun olan kök ve kökboğazı çürüklüğü etmenlerinin hububatta verim komponentlerine etkileri ve mücadelesi üzerinde araştırmalar. Orta Anadoluda Hububat Tarımının Sorunları ve Çözüm Yolları Sempozyumu, 392-403. Aktaş H. 2001. Önemli hububat hastalıkları ve survey yöntemleri. 52s. Anonim 2011. DİE. Tarımsal Yapı (Üretim, Fiyat, Değer). s: 7. Arslan Ü. ve Baykal N. 2002. Kök ve Kökboğazı Fungal Patojenlerine Karşı Bazı Buğday Çeşitlerinin Reaksiyonları ve Tohum Koruyucu Fungusitlerin Fusarium culmorum (W.G.Sm.) Sacc.’a Etkisi,. Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 16:, 69-76.
  3. Axing X., Sun B.,Yuan H., Wang M. and Li H. 2008. Evaluation on the resistance of wheat cultivars to sharp eyespot in the field. 4th International Symposium on Rhizoctonia, 20-22 August 2008, Berlin. 85p. Carling D.E. and Summer D.R. 1992. Rhizoctonia in: Singleton L.L., Mihail J.D. and Rush C.M. (eds.) Methods for Research on Soilborne Phytopathogenic Fungi, APS Press, 157-165 p, St. Paul Minnesota. Clarkson J.D.S. and Cook R.J. 1983. Effect of sharp eyespot on yield loss in winter wheat. Plant Pathol., 32: 421-428.
  4. Cromey M. G., Buthler R.C., Boddington H.J. and Moorhead A.R. 2002. Effects of sharp eye spot on yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum). N. Z. Crop Hortic.Sci., 30: 9-17.
  5. Cromey M. G., Buthler R. C. and Munro C. A. 2005. Susceptibility of the New Zeland wheat cultivars to sharp eyespot. New Zealand Plant Protection, 58: 268-272. Demirci E. 1998. Rhizoctonia species and anastomosis groups isolated from barley and wheat in Erzurum, Turkey, Plant Pathology, 47(1): 10-15.
  6. Frugal-Wegrzycka H., Adamiak J. and Adamiak E. 1996. Some characteristic of Rhizoctonia spp. in sharp eye spot of wheat. Acta Mycologica, 31(2):199-208. Karman M. 1971. Bitki Koruma Araştırmalarında Genel Bilgiler, Denemelerin Kuruluşu ve Değerlendirme Esasları, Bornova-İzmir, 279s. Kim D.S., Cook R. J. and Weller D. M. 1997.