Journals / Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 14

A COMPARISION OF CHARACTERISTICS OF TURKISH BUSINESS GROUP AS AN ORGANIZATIONAL FORM WITH CHARACTERISTICS OF BUSINESS GROUPS IN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES

BİR ÖRGÜTSEL FORM OLARAK TÜRKİYE’DEKİ İŞLETME GRUPLARININ ÖZELLİKLERİ İLE FARKLI ÜLKELERDEKİ İŞLETME GRUPLARININ ÖZELLİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Pages
261–281
Publication Date
2016-04-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Which business groups in different countries are more similar to Turkish business groups is shown by considering five criteria in this article.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this research, the characteristics of business groups running in different countries and characteristics of Turkish business groups included in “The Oxford Handbook of Business Groups” are examined by using a comparative analysis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These criteria are (I) ownership and governance pattern, (II) strategy of industrial (or business) diversification and internationalization, (III) prevalent organizational structure, (IV) economic significance and (V) performance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Which business groups in different countries are more similar to Turkish business groups is shown by considering five criteria in this article.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İşletme Grupları · Örgütsel Form · Türkiye

Abstract

In this research, the characteristics of business groups running in different countries and characteristics of Turkish business groups included in “The Oxford Handbook of Business Groups” are examined by using a comparative analysis. The paper looks into differences and similarities of organisational forms of business group in different countries dealt in the Handbook, by using a holistic approach. This analysis based on five criteria. These criteria are (I) ownership and governance pattern, (II) strategy of industrial (or business) diversification and internationalization, (III) prevalent organizational structure, (IV) economic significance and (V) performance. Which business groups in different countries are more similar to Turkish business groups is shown by considering five criteria in this article.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, “The Oxford Handbook of Business Groups” adlı eserde konu edilen farklı ülkelerdeki işletme grubu örgütsel formuna ait karakteristikler ile Türkiye’deki işletme gruplarına ait karakteristikler karşılaştırmalı bir şekilde incelenmiştir. Bu inceleme, belirtilen eserdeki, farklı ülkelerdeki işletme grubu örgütsel formlarının benzerlik ve farklılıklarına bütünsel bir şekilde bakmaktadır. İnceleme beş ana kriter açısından yapılmıştır. Bunlar; (1) sahiplik ve yönetim deseni, (2) endüstriyel (iş) çeşitlendirme ve uluslararasılaşma stratejisi, (3) hakim örgüt yapısı, (4) iktisadi önem ve (5) performans şeklindedir. Belirtilen beş kriter kapsamında hangi ülkelerdeki işletme gruplarının Türkiye’deki işletme gruplarına daha çok benzediği de ortaya konulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

DİRLİK, S. (2016). A COMPARISION OF CHARACTERISTICS OF TURKISH BUSINESS GROUP AS AN ORGANIZATIONAL FORM WITH CHARACTERISTICS OF BUSINESS GROUPS IN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 14, 261–281. https://ajindex.com/articles/381252

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. The Oxford Handbook of Business Groups adlı kitabın bölümlerini belirtir. Aldrighi, Dante. M. - Postali, Fernando A.S. (2010), “Business Groups in Brazil”. Çolpan, Aslı. M., Hikino, Takashi and Lincoln, James. R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Business Groups, Oxford University Press. Oxford, (353-386).
  2. Amable, Bruno. (2003), The Diversity of Modern Capitalism. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  3. Arıman, Abdurrahman (1982). “Türkiye’de Sermaye Yoğunlaşması Ve Sermaye Gruplarının Oluşumu”. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. İstanbul.
  4. Buğra, Ayşe (1990), “The Turkish Holding Company as a Social Institution”. Ekonomi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Vol. 4, No. 1., (35-51).
  5. Buğra, Ayşe (1994), State and Business in Modern Turkey: A Comparative Study. NY: State University of New York Press,
  6. New York. Business Hisyory. (2016), Business Groups Around the World. Vol. 58. No.1. Boyd, Brian - Hoskisson, Robert. E. (2010), “Corporate Governance of Business Groups”. Çolpan, Aslı. M., Hikino, Takashi and Lincoln, James. R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Business Groups, Oxford University Press. Oxford, (670-695).
  7. Carney, Michael - Gedajlovic, Eric. R. - Heugens, Pursey - Van Essen, Marc - Van Oosterhout, J. (2011), “Business Group Affiliation, Performance, Context, and Strategy: A Meta-Analysis”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 54, No. 3, (437-460).
  8. Chang Sea. J. - Hong, J aebum. (2000), “Economic Performance of Group-Affiliated Companies in Korea: Intragroup Resource Sharing and Internal Business Transactions”. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43, No. 3, (429–448).
  9. Chung, Chi.-N. - Mahmood, Ishtiaq. P. (2010), “Business Groups in Taiwan”. Çolpan, Aslı. M., Hikino, Takashi and Lincoln, James. R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Business Groups, Oxford University Press. Oxford, (180-209).
  10. Collin, Sven- Olof. (1998), “Why Are These Islands of Conscious Power Found in the Ocean of Ownership? Institutional and Governance Hypotheses Explaining The Existence of Business Groups in Sweden”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 35, No. 6, (719-746).
  11. Çolpan, Aslı. M. - Hikino, Takashi. (2008), “Türkiye’nin Büyük Şirketler Kesiminde İşletme Gruplarının İktisadi Rolü ve Çeşitlendirme Stratejileri”, Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt. 8, Sayı: 1-2, (23-58).
  12. Çolpan, Aslı. M. - Hikino, Takashi - Lincoln, James. R. (Eds.), (2010), The Oxford Handbook of Business Groups, Oxford University Press.
  13. Oxford. Çolpan, Aslı. M. - Hikino, Takashi - L