Journals / Bitki Koruma Bülteni / 2017 / Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 1

The response of winter barley to drift doses of imazamox

Kışlık arpanın imazamox’un sürüklenme dozlarına tepkisi

Pages
57–63
Publication Date
2017-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

High amount of precipitation during the active growth stage can increase the detrimental effects of the herbicide.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Response of the winter barley (Hordeum vulgare L. var.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Aydan Hanım) to imazamox drift rates was determined in trial experiments conducted Ankara province (Gölbaşı, Halaçlı village) in 2014 and 2016.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:High amount of precipitation during the active growth stage can increase the detrimental effects of the herbicide.
🔬Design:Experimental Field Trial
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Imazamox · kışlık arpa · Hordeum vulgare

Abstract

Response of the winter barley (Hordeum vulgare L. var. Aydan Hanım) to imazamox drift rates was determined in trial experiments conducted Ankara province (Gölbaşı, Halaçlı village) in 2014 and 2016. The herbicide at the doses of 0.625, 0.315 and 0.08 g active ingredient (a.i.) da-1 was applied to winter barley plants during the first node stage using a CO2 pressurised knapsack sprayer. The field trials were set randomised block design with 4 repetitions. Phytotoxicity and yield loss caused by the lowest rate of herbicide was very limited while the yield loss caused by the high doses were very high. Parcel yields used at the highest herbicide dose (0.625 g a.i. da-1) was reduced by 55% compared to the untreated control in 2016 when precipitation was higher than normal. There was a closely relation between efficacy of the drift doses of herbicide and weather conditions. High amount of precipitation during the active growth stage can increase the detrimental effects of the herbicide.

Özet

Kışlık arpa (Hordeum vulgare L. var. Aydanhanım)’nın imazamox’un sürüklenme (drift) dozlarına tepkisi Ankara (Gölbaşı, Halaçlı köyü) ilinde 2014 ve 2016 yıllarında kurulan denemeler ile belirlenmiştir. Herbisit, kışlık arpa bitkilerine kardeşlenme sonu dönemde 0.625, 0.315 ve 0.08 g aktif madde (a.m.) da-1 dozlarda CO2 basınçlı sırt pülverizatörü ile uygulanmıştır. Denemeler tesadüf blokları deneme desenine göre 4 tekerrürlü kurulmuştur. Herbisitten kaynaklanan fitotoksisite ve verim kaybı düşük dozda sınırlı kalırken herbisitin yüksek dozlarından kaynaklanan verim kayıpları oldukça yüksek bulunmuştur. Yağışın fazla olduğu 2016 yılında yüksek herbisit dozu (0.625 g a.m. da-1) uygulanan parsellerde verim, kontrole göre %55 daha düşük bulunmuştur. Herbisitlerin drift dozlarının etkisi ile iklim koşulları yakın ilişkili olup, arpanın hızlı gelişme gösterdiği dönemde yağışın yüksek olması herbisitin zararını artırmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SERİM, A. T., ELİBÜYÜK, E. A., GÜZEL, N. P., TÜRKSEVEN, S. (2017). The response of winter barley to drift doses of imazamox. Bitki Koruma Bülteni, Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 1, 57–63. https://ajindex.com/articles/38098

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Anonim 2016a. TÜİK, http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTabloArama.do (Erişim Tarihi: 09.11.2016). Anonim 2016b. B KU Veri Tabanı Programı. https://bku.tarim.gov.tr/ (Erişim tarihi: 08.11.2016) Anonymous 2003. E-Pesticide Manual 2003. Thirteenth Edition.
  2. BCPC Publications, Version 3.0 ISBN 1-901396-34-7
  3. Ball D. A., Yenish J. P. and Alby T. 2003. Effect of imazamox soil persistence on dry land rotational crops. Weed Technology, 17(1), 161-165.
  4. Deeds Z. A., Kassım Al-Khatib, Peterson D. E. and Stahlman P. W. 2006. Wheat Response to Simulated Drift of Glyphosate and Imazamox Applied at Two Growth Stages. Weed Technology, 20(1), 23-31.
  5. Evci G., Sezer N., Pekcan V., Yılmaz M. I.and Kaya Y. 2011. Broomrape Control in Sunflower Production in Turkey. Journal of Academy of Science of Moldova, 2(314), 111-117.
  6. Miller D. K., Downer R. G., Leonard B. R., Holman E. M. and Kelly S. T. 2003. Response of Non–Glufosinate-Resistant Cotton to Reduced Rates of Glufosinate. Weed Science, 51(5), 781-785. Nordby A. L. F. and Skuterud R. 1974.
  7. The Effects of Boom Height, Working Pressure and Wind Speed on Spray Drift. Weed Research, 14(6), 385-395. Oyarzabal E. S. 1991. Effect of weed water stress on post emergence herbicide activity. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. Iowa State University. Iowa/ USA, 159 pp. Pannacci E., Onofri A. and Covarelli G. 2006.
  8. Biological Activity, Availability and Duration of Phytotoxicity for Imazamox in Four Different Soils of Central Italy. Weed Research, 46(3), 243-250.
  9. Roider C. A., Griffin J. L., Harrison S. A. and Jones C. A. 2007. Wheat Response to Simulated Glyphosate Drift. Weed Technology, 21(4), 1010-1015. Serim A. T. and Maden S. 2014. Effects of Soil Residues of Sulfosulfuron and Mesosulfuron Methyl+ Iodosulfuron Methyl Sodium on Sunflower Varieties. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 20(1), 1-9. Serim A. T. ve Özdemir Y. G. 2012. Herbisit Uygulamalarında Kullanılan Pülverizatör Memelerinin Damla Büyüklük Dağılımlarının Belirlenmesi. Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 5(2), 172-175.
  10. Serim A. T., Başaran M. S., Dursun E., Koçtürk B. Ö. ve Üre T. 2008. Uygulama Normu ve Hava Emişli Memenin Bazı Buğday Herbisitlerinin Performansına Etkileri. Türkiye Herboloji Dergisi, 11(1), 16-25.
  11. Webster E., Hensley J., Blouin D., Harrell D. and Bond J. 2016. Rice Crop Response to Simulated Drift of Imazamox. Weed Technology, 30(1), 99-105.
  12. Zadoks J. C., Chang T. T. and Konzak C. F. 1974. A Decimal Code for the Growth Stages of Cereals. Weed Research, 14(6), 415-421.
  13. Zhang W., Webs