Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2016 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 3

Does length of prostate biopsy cores have an impact on diagnosis of prostate cancer?

Pages
130–133
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A median sample length of 12 mm is ideal lower limit for cancer detection, and biopsy procedures which yield shorter biopsy cores should be repeated

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To investigate whether core length is a significant biopsy parameter in the detection of prostate cancer.Material and methods: We retrospectively analyzed pathology reports of the specimens of 188 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer who had undergone initial transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy, and compared biopsy core lengths of the patients with, and without prostate cancer.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The biopsy specimens of prostate cancer patients were divided into 3 groups according to core length, and the data obtained were compared (Group 1; total core length 20 mm).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A median sample length of 12 mm is ideal lower limit for cancer detection, and biopsy procedures which yield shorter biopsy cores should be repeated
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: To investigate whether core length is a significant biopsy parameter in the detection of prostate cancer.Material and methods: We retrospectively analyzed pathology reports of the specimens of 188 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer who had undergone initial transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy, and compared biopsy core lengths of the patients with, and without prostate cancer. The biopsy specimens of prostate cancer patients were divided into 3 groups according to core length, and the data obtained were compared (Group 1; total core length 20 mm). Biopsy core lengths of the patients diagnosed as prostate cancer, and benign prostatic hyperplasia were compared, and a certain cut- off value for core length with optimal diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for prostate cancer was calculated.Results: Mean age, PSA and total length of cores were 65.08±7.41 years, 9.82±6.34 ng/mL and 11.2±0.2 mm, respectively. Assessment of biopsy core lengths showed that cores with cancer (n=993, median length 12.5 mm) were significantly longer than benign cores (n=1185, median length=11.3 mm) (p<0.001). Core length analysis yielded 12 mm cores have an optimal sensitivity (41.9%) and specificity (62%) for detection of cancer (odds ratio: 1.08).Conclusion: Biopsy core length is one of the most important parameter that determines the quality of biopsy and detection of prostate cancer. A median sample length of 12 mm is ideal lower limit for cancer detection, and biopsy procedures which yield shorter biopsy cores should be repeated

🔖

Cite This Article

ERGÜN2, M., ISLAMOGLU, E., YALÇINKAYA, S., TOKGÖZ, H., SAVAŞ, M. (2016). Does length of prostate biopsy cores have an impact on diagnosis of prostate cancer?. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 3, 130–133. https://ajindex.com/articles/380022

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. American Cancer Society: Prostate Cancer. Available at http:// www.cancer.org/cancer/prostatecancer/detailedguide/prostatecancerkey-statistics United States of America 2013. Accessed February 27, 2012
  2. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 1989;142:71-4
  3. Djavan B, Ravery V, Zlotta A, Dobronski P, Dobrovits M, Fakhari M, et al. Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3, and 4: When should we stop? J Urol 2001;166:1679- 83
  4. Lane RB, Jr, Lane CG, Mangold KA, Johnson MH, Alsbrook WC Jr. Needle biopsies of the prostate: what constitutes adequate histologic sampling? Arch Pathol Lab Med 1998;122:833-5
  5. Rogatsch H, Mairinger T, Horninger W, Bartsch G, Mikuz G, Mairinger T. Optimized preembedding method improves the histologic yield of prostatic core needle biopsies. Prostate 2000;42:124-9. [CrossRef] 6. Eichler K, Hempel S, Wilby J, Myers L, Bachmann LM, Kleijnen J. Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: A systematic review. J Urol 2006;175:1605-12. [CrossRef] 7. Iczkowski KA, Casella G, Seppala RJ, Jones GL, Mishler BA, Qian J, et al. Needle core length in sextant biopsy influences prostate cancer detection rate. Urology 2002;59:698-703. [CrossRef] 8. Fiset PO, Aprikian A, Brimo F. Length of prostate biopsy cores: does it impact cancer detection? Can J Urol 2013;20:6848-53
  6. Dogan HS, Aytac B, Kordan Y, Gasanov F, Yavascaoglu İ. What is the adequacy of biopsies for prostate sampling? Urol Oncol 2011;29:280-3
  7. Van der Kwast TH, Lopes C, Santonja C, Pihl CG, Neetens I, Martikainen P, et al. Guidelines for processing and reporting of prostatic needle biopsies. J Clin Pathol 2003;56:336-40. [CrossRef] 11. Boccon-Gibod L, Van der Kwast TH, Montironi R, Boccon-Gibod L, Bono A. Handling and pathology reporting of prostate biopsies. Eur Urol 2004;46:177-81. [CrossRef] 12. Ficarra V, Martignoni G, Novella G, Cerruto MA, Galfano A, Novara G, et al. Needle core length is a quality indicator of systematic transperineal prostate biopsy. Eur Urol 2006;50:266-71. [CrossRef] 13. Obek C, Doganca T, Erdal S, Erdogan S, Durak H. Core length in prostate biopsy: size matters. J Urol 2012;187:2051-5. [CrossRef] 14. Berber U, Haholu A, Küçükodacı Z, Yılmaz İ. 12 Kadran prostat biyopsi protokolünde toplam kor uzunluğunun kanser saptanma oranına etkisi. Gulhane Med J 2013;55:203-6. 15.