SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Van Tıp Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 4

The Complications of Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in the Process of the Learning Curve

Robot Yardımlı Laparoskopik Radikal Prostatektomide Öğrenme Eğrisi Sürecindeki Komplikasyonlar

Mustafa GÜNEŞ
Müslüm ERGÜN2
Recep ERYILMAZ
Rahmi ASLAN
Pages
364–368
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review, the complications of RALRP in the process of the learning curve have been discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men.
📊
Key Findings & Data:RALRP has less complication rates when compared with other techniques.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review, the complications of RALRP in the process of the learning curve have been discussed.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men. Radical prostatectomy is the major curative treatment option in localised prostate cancer. Radical prostatectomy can be perfomed as open retropubic, perineal, laparoscopic or robotic assisted laparoscopic. In the last years, RALRP has gained more popularity. RALRP has less complication rates when compared with other techniques. In this review, the complications of RALRP in the process of the learning curve have been discussed.

Özet

Erkeklerde prostat kanseri en sık görülen kanserdir. Lokalize prostat kanserinde radikal prostatektomi temel küratif tedavi seçeneğidir. Radikal prostatektomi açık retropubik, perineal, laparoskopik ya da robot yardımlı laparoskopik olarak uygulanabilir. Son yıllarda robotik yardımlı laparoskopik radikal prostatektomi (RALRP; robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy) daha fazla popülarite kazanmıştır. RALRP diğer teknikler ile karşılaştırıldığında daha az komplikasyon oranlarına sahiptir. Bu derlemede, RALRP' de öğrenme eğrisi sürecindeki komplikasyonlar ele alınmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNEŞ, M., ERGÜN2, M., ERYILMAZ, R., ASLAN, R. (2016). The Complications of Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in the Process of the Learning Curve. Van Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 4, 364–368. https://ajindex.com/articles/334550

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Heidenreich A, Aus G, Bolla M, Joniau S, Matveev VB, Schmid HP, et al. European Association of Urology. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2008; 53(1): 68-80.
  2. Stamey TA, Yang N, Hay AR, McNeal JE, Freiha FS, Redwine E. Prostate-spesific antigen as a serum marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. N Engl J Med 1987; 317(15): 909-916.
  3. Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, et al. EAU-ESTROSIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol 2016: S0302-2838(16); 30470-30475.
  4. Bianco FJ Jr, Scardino PT, Eastham JA. Radical prostatectomy: long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function ("trifecta"). Urology 2005; 66(5 Suppl): 83-94.
  5. Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial shortterm experience. Urology 1997; 50(6): 854-857.
  6. Fracalanza S, Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Galfano A, Novara G, Mangano A, et al. Is robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy less invasive than retropubic radical prostatectomy? esults from a prospective, unrandomized, comparative study. BJU Int 2008; 101(9): 1145-1149.
  7. Binder J, Kramer W. Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2001; 87(4): 408-410.
  8. Froehner M, Novotny V, Koch R, Leike S, Twelker L, Wirth MP. Perioperative complications after radical prostatectomy: open versus robot-assisted laparoscopic ap-proach. Urol Int 2013; 90(3): 312- 315. Hu JC, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, Barry MJ, D'Amico AV, Weinberg AC, et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. JAMA 2009; 302(14): 1557-1564.
  9. Krambeck AE, DiMarco DS, Rangel LJ, Bergstralh EJ, Myers RP, Blute ML, et al. Radical prostatec-tomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques. BJU Int 2009; 103(4): 448-453.
  10. Lowrance WT, Eastham JA, Savage C, Maschino AC, Laudone VP, Dechet CBS, et al. Contemporary open and robotic radical prostatectomy practice patterns among urologists in the United States. J Urol 2012; 187(6): 2087-2092
  11. Catalona WJ, Carvalhal GF, Mager DE, Smith DS. Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol 1999; 162(2): 433-438.
  12. Guazzoni G, Cestari A, Naspro R, Riva M, Centemero A, Zanoni M, et al. Intra- and perioperative outcomes comparing radical retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results from a prosp