Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2016 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 4

The role of ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of kidney stones

Pages
261–266
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The UMP procedure was successful in 96% of the renal units at the 1st month control visit assessment.Conclusion: The outcomes of our study have demonstrated that UMP is an effective and safe treatment modality, especially in the treatment of medium-sized renal calculi

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In our study we aimed to evaluate outcomes of ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP) performed for the treatment of kidney stones.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and methods: Between October 2014 and September 2015, a single surgeon performed UMP on a total of 49 consecutive patients with symptomatic kidney stones at our center.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The UMP procedure was successful in 96% of the renal units at the 1st month control visit assessment.Conclusion: The outcomes of our study have demonstrated that UMP is an effective and safe treatment modality, especially in the treatment of medium-sized renal calculi
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: In our study we aimed to evaluate outcomes of ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP) performed for the treatment of kidney stones. Material and methods: Between October 2014 and September 2015, a single surgeon performed UMP on a total of 49 consecutive patients with symptomatic kidney stones at our center. Pregnants, anticogulant users, patients with bleeding diathesis pyonephrosis, and partial/complete staghorn stones were excluded from the study. Patient characteristics, operative data and postoperative outcomes were assessed in detail.Results: The UMP was performed on 50 (34 right/16 left) renal units of the 48 (28 male/20 female) patients included in this study. The mean age and body mass index was 36.5 years and 26.2 (17.6-32.8) kg/m2, respectively. Mean stone size was calculated as 22.2 mm. The mean durations of the operations and fluoroscopic examination were calculated as 65.4 minutes and 89.4 seconds, respectively. The mean duration of hospitalization was 1.4 days. In 52% of the patients the procedure was terminated tubeless. Mean hemoglobin drop was 0.6 g/dL. Our series experienced a 10% complication rate. The UMP procedure was successful in 96% of the renal units at the 1st month control visit assessment.Conclusion: The outcomes of our study have demonstrated that UMP is an effective and safe treatment modality, especially in the treatment of medium-sized renal calculi

🔖

Cite This Article

TEPELER, A., BAŞIBÜYÜK, İ., TOSUN, M., ARMAĞAN, A. (2016). The role of ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of kidney stones. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 4, 261–266. https://ajindex.com/articles/379979

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, Nakada SY, Pearle MS, Wolf JS Jr. AUA Nephrolithiasis Guideline Panel. Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol 2005;173:1991-2000. [CrossRef] 2. Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, Sarica K, Skolarikos A, Straub M, et al. Guidelines on Urolithiasis. Amsterdam, Netherlands: European Association of Urology; 2015;1-71. 3. Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 2007;51:899-906. [CrossRef] 4. Skolarikos A, de la Rosette J. Prevention and treatment of complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Curr Opin Urol 2008;18:229-34. [CrossRef] 5. Kukreja R, Desai M, Patel S, Bapat S, Desai M. Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study. J Endourol 2004;18:715-22. [CrossRef] 6. De la Rosette JJ, Zuazu JR, Tsakiris P, Elsakka AM, Zudaire JJ, Laguna MP, et al. Prognostic factors and percutaneous nephrolithotomy morbidity: a multivariate analysis of a contemporary series using the Clavien classification. J Urol 2008;180:2489-93. [CrossRef] 7. Helal M, Black T, Lockhart J, Figueroa TE. The Hickman peel away sheath: alternative for pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 1997;11:171-2. [CrossRef] 8. Jackman SV, Docimo SG, Cadeddu JA, Bishoff JT, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW. The “miniperc” technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 1998;16:371-4. [CrossRef] 9. Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Seitz M, Sharma R, Stief CG, Desai M. The “all-seeing needle”: initial results of an optical puncture system confirming access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 2011;59:1054-9. [CrossRef] 10. Desai J, Zeng G, Zhao Z, Zhong W, Chen W, Wu W. A novel technique of ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: introduction and an initial experience for treatment of upper urinary calculi less than 2 cm. Biomed Res Int 2013;490793. [CrossRef] 11. Desai J, Solanki R. Ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP): one more armamentarium. BJU Int 2013;112:1046-9. [CrossRef] 12. Shah AK, Xu K, Liu H, Huang H, Lin T, Bi L, et al. Implementation of Ultramini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of 2-3cm Kidney Stones: A Preliminary Report. J Endourol 2015;29:1231-6. [CrossRef] 13. Wilhelm K, Hein S, Adams F, Schlager D, Miernik A, Schoenthaler M. Ultra-mini PCNL versus flexible ureteroscopy: a matched analysis of analgesic consumption and treatment-related