Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2019 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 3

Autologous transobturator midurethral sling

Pages
230–232
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Studies with largervolume and long-term follow up periods are needed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study is to describe a novel transobturator midurethral sling surgery techniqueby using rectus abdominis fascia.Material and methods: A 54-year-old woman complaining of urinary leakage during effort was diagnosed as pure stress urinary incontinence after detailed questioning, pelvic examination, uroflowmetry andmeasurement of residual urine volume.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A 5 cm rectus fascia was harvested via suprapubic incision and nonabsorbable stay sutures were placed on its’ both edges.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Studies with largervolume and long-term follow up periods are needed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The aim of this study is to describe a novel transobturator midurethral sling surgery techniqueby using rectus abdominis fascia.Material and methods: A 54-year-old woman complaining of urinary leakage during effort was diagnosed as pure stress urinary incontinence after detailed questioning, pelvic examination, uroflowmetry andmeasurement of residual urine volume. She was anxious about complications related to synthetic meshes.However, she was not interested in relatively morbid surgeries such as colposuspension and pubovaginalsling. Autologous transobturator midurethral sling was discussed with the patient. The patient approved thesurgery and the surgery was planned. A 5 cm rectus fascia was harvested via suprapubic incision and nonabsorbable stay sutures were placed on its’ both edges. Anterior vaginal incision together with paravaginaldissection was performed, as in classical transobturator sling surgery. Groin puncture and blind dissectionof adipose tissue was performed. C-shaped trocars were inserted, and advanced through groin punctures andbrought up to midurethral incision by finger guidance. Stay sutures were transported via C-shaped trocars tothe groin puncture in both sides. Graft was positioned on the midurethral part without any tension and staysutures were tied to create a tissue bridge on obturator membrane. Incisions were closed and vaginal tamponwas placed. Patient was discharged at the first postoperative day.Results: At postoperative third and sixth months, patient was totally dry and did not have any voiding complaints. Small abdominal and vaginal incisions were clean, as well.Conclusion: Autologous transobturator midurethral sling surgery is a safe, effective and feasible surgicaloption for stress urinary incontinence in the era which mesh-related concerns are rising. Studies with largervolume and long-term follow up periods are needed.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇUBUK, A., ERBİN, A., SAVUN, M., AYRANCI, A., ÜÇPINAR, B., YANARAL, F., SARILAR, Ö., BAŞAL, Ş., AKBULUT, M. F. (2019). Autologous transobturator midurethral sling. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 3, 230–232. https://ajindex.com/articles/379815

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Linder BJ, Elliott DS. Autologous transobturator urethral sling placement for female stress urinary incontinence: short-term outcomes. Urology 2016;93:55-9. [CrossRef] 2. Chapple CR, Cruz F, Deffieux X, Milani AL, Arlandis S, Artibani W, et al. Consensus Statement of the European Urology Association and the European Urogynaecological Association on the Use of Implanted Materials for Treating Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Stress Urinary Incontinence. Eur Urol 2017;72:424-31. [CrossRef] 3. Linder BJ, El-Nashar SA, Carranza Leon DA, Trabuco EC. Predictors of vaginal mesh exposure after midurethral sling placement: a case-control study. Int Urogynecol J 2016;27:1321-6. [CrossRef] 4. Kokanali MK, Doğanay M, Aksakal O, Cavkaytar S, Topçu HO, Özer İ. Risk factors for mesh erosion after vaginal sling procedures for urinary incontinence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014;177:146-50. [CrossRef] 5. Chughtai B, Barber MD, Mao J, Forde JC, Normand ST, Sedrakyan A. Association Between the Amount of Vaginal Mesh Used With Mesh Erosions and Repeated Surgery After Repairing Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Stress Urinary Incontinence. JAMA Surg 2017;152:257-63. [CrossRef] 6. United States Food and Drug Administration: Considerations about Surgical Mesh for SUI. (2018): Available from: https:// www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/UroGynSurgicalMesh/ucm345219.htm Accessed Jan 2018. 7. Chapple CR, Raz S, Brubaker L, Zimmern PE. Mesh sling in an era of uncertainty: lessons learned and the way forward. Eur Urol 2013;64:525-9. [CrossRef] 8. Linder BJ, Elliott DS. Autologous transobturator urethral sling placement for female stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 2015;193:991-6. [CrossRef] 9. Ghoniem GM, Rizk DEE. Renaissance of the autologous pubovaginal sling. Int Urogynecol J 2018;29:177-8. [CrossRef] 10. Bailly GG, Carlson KV. The pubovaginal sling: Reintroducing an old friend. Can Urol Assoc J 2017;11(6 Suppl 2):S147-51. 11. Osman NI, Hillary CJ, Mangera A, Aldamanhoori R, Inman RD, Chapple CR. The Midurethral Fascial "Sling on a String": An Alternative to Midurethral Synthetic Tapes in the Era of Mesh Complications. Eur Urol 2018;74:191-6. [CrossRef]