Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2015 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 3

İleri derecede korporal fibrozis olgularında penil protez implantasyonu öncesi korpus kavernozum içini boşaltmak için mikrodebrider kullanımı: yeni bir minimal invaziv cerrahi teknik

Use of a microdebrider for corporeal excavation and penile prosthesis implantation in men with severely fibrosed corpora cavernosa: a new minimal invasive surgical technique

Pages
119–124
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The main advantages include fast, safe, and effective excavation of fibrous corpora cavernosa adequate for a satisfactory penile prosthesis implantation

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To propose a new minimal invasive surgical technique using a microdebrider (shaver) to excavate the fibrosed corpora cavernosa for penile prosthesis implantation in patients with severe fibrosis.Material and methods: Two patients with severe corporeal fibrosis were implanted with a penile prosthesis using this technique.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The mean operation time was 57 min.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The main advantages include fast, safe, and effective excavation of fibrous corpora cavernosa adequate for a satisfactory penile prosthesis implantation
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To propose a new minimal invasive surgical technique using a microdebrider (shaver) to excavate the fibrosed corpora cavernosa for penile prosthesis implantation in patients with severe fibrosis.Material and methods: Two patients with severe corporeal fibrosis were implanted with a penile prosthesis using this technique. In the first patient, fibrosis was due to neglected idiopathic ischemic priapism and the second patient had his prosthesis extruded because of erosion in another center. Both patients were counseled about the procedure and the possible complications related to the experimental nature of the technique. A written informed consent was obtained from both patients. Excavation of the corpora was performed using microdebrider in both patients.Results: Both operations were performed successfully without any intraoperative complications, including urethral injury or perforation of the tunica. The mean operation time was 57 min. The postoperative period was uneventful without any infection, migration, erosion, or mechanical failure. The penile length was increased nearly 2 cm in both patients, and the penile girth was increased around 30% in the patient who underwent inflatable penile prosthesis implantation.Conclusion: The microdebrider potentially provides an important advance in patients with severe corporeal fibrosis to excavate the fibrosed corpora cavernosa for penile prosthesis implantation. The main advantages include fast, safe, and effective excavation of fibrous corpora cavernosa adequate for a satisfactory penile prosthesis implantation

Özet

Amaç: İleri derecede korporal fibrozisi olan hastalarda penil protez implantasyonu öncesi korpus kavernozum içindeki fibrotik dokunun boşaltılması için yeni bir minimal invaziv cerrahi yöntem olarak mikrodebrider tekniğini sunmak. Gereç ve yöntemler: Bu teknik kullanılarak ileri derecede korporal fibrozisi olan iki hastaya penil protez implantasyonu gerçekleştirildi. İlk hastada fibrozis gecikmiş idiopatik iskemik priapizme bağlı idi, ikinci hastada ise dış merkezde erozyon nedeni ile penil protezi çıkarılmıştı. Hastalar işlemin daha önce uygulanmamış bir teknik olduğu konusunda ve gelişebilecek komplikasyonlar hakkında bilgilendirildiler. Her iki hastadan da aydınlatılmış onam belgesi alındı. İki hastada da mikrodebrider kullanılarak korpora içindeki fibrotik doku boşaltıldı.Bulgular: Her iki operasyon da tunika perforasyonu ve üretral yaralanma gibi herhangi bir intraoperatif komplikasyon olmaksızın başarılı bir şekilde gerçekleştirildi. Ortalama operasyon süresi 57 dakika idi. Postoperatif dönemde enfeksiyon, migrasyon, erozyon veya mekanik arıza gibi herhangi bir problem saptanmadı. Hastalarda penis uzunluğunda ortalama 2 cm artış saptandı, şişirilebilir penil protez takılan hastanın penis çevresinde ise yaklaşık %30 artış saptandı. Sonuç: Mikrodebrider kullanımı ileri derecede korporal fibrozisi olan hastalarda penil protez implantasyonu öncesi korpus kavernozum içindeki fibrotik dokunun boşaltılmasında önemli avantajlar sunmaktadır. Bu tekniğin en önemli avantajı uygun penis protez implantasyonuna olanak sağlayacak şekilde korpus kavernozum içindeki fibrotik dokunun hızlı, güvenli ve etkili bir şekilde boşaltılabilmesidir

🔖

Cite This Article

BOZKURT, İ. H., YONGUÇ, T., AYDOĞDU, Ö., DEĞİRMENCİ, T., ARSLAN, M., MİNARECİ, S. (2015). İleri derecede korporal fibrozis olgularında penil protez implantasyonu öncesi korpus kavernozum içini boşaltmak için mikrodebrider kullanımı: yeni bir minimal invaziv cerrahi teknik. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 3, 119–124. https://ajindex.com/articles/379748

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Martinez-Salamanca JI, Mueller A, Moncada I, Carballido J, Mulhall J. Penile prosthesis surgery in patients with corporal fibrozis: a state of the art review. J Sex Med 2011;8:1880-9. [Crossref] 2. Wilson SK. Reimplantation of inflatable penile prosthesis into scarred corporeal bodies. Int J Impot Res 2003;15(Suppl 5):S125-8. [Crossref] 3. Stember DS, Mulhall JP. Ischemic priapism and implant surgery with sharp corporal fibrozis excision. J Sex Med 2010;7:1987-90. [Crossref] 4. Orvis BR, McAninch JW. Penile rupture. Urol Clin North Am 1989;16:369-75. 5. Levine LA, Benson J, Hoover C. Inflatable penile prosthesis placement in men with Peyronie’s disease and drug-resis￾tant erectile dysfunction: A single center study. J Sex Med 2010;7:3775-83. [Crossref] 6. Larsen EH, Gasser TC, Bruskewitz RC. Fibrozis of corpus cav￾ernosum after intracavernous injection of phentolamine/papaver￾ine. J Urol 1987;137:292-3. 7. Goldstein I, Nehra A, Werner M. Technique and follow-up of sharp corporal tissue excision procedure for prosthesis implan￾tation with bilateral severe diffuse corporeal fibrosis. J Urol 1995;4:360A. 8. Knoll LD, Furlow WL. Corporeal reconstruction and prosthetic implantation for impotence associated with non-dilatable corpo￾real cavernosal fibrosis. Acta Urol Belg 1992;60:15-25. 9. Montague DK, Angermeier KW. Corporeal excavation: new technique for penile prosthesis implantation in men with severe corporeal fibrozis. Urology 2006;67:1072-5. [Crossref] 10. Rosello Barbara M, Carrion HM. Cavernotomy. Arch Esp Urol 1991;44:185-6. 11. Mooreville M, Adrian S, Delk JR 2nd, Wilson SK. Implantation of inflatable penile prosthesis in patients with severe corpo￾real fibrozis: Introduction of a new penile cavernotome. J Urol 1999;162:2054-7. [Crossref 12. Shaeer OO, Shaeer AA. Corporoscopic excavation of the fibrosed corpora cavernosa for penile prosthesis implantation: Optical corporotomy and trans-corporeal recection, Shaeer’s technique. J Sex Med 2007;4:218-25. [Crossref] 13. Knoll LD. Use of penile prosthetic implants in patients with penile fibrozis. Urol Clin North Am 1995;22:857-63. 14. Jarow JP. Risk factors for penile prosthetic infection. J Urol 1996;156:402-4. [Crossref] 15. Boyd S, Martin F. Simultaneous ultrex penile prosthesis re￾implantation and Gore-Tex grafting corporoplasty functional outcome of a surgical challange. J Urol 1995;153. 16. Fishman IJ, Scott FB, Light JK. Experience with inflatable penile prosthesis. Urology 1984;23:86-92. [Crossr