Journals / Eurasian Journal of Medicine / 2018 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2

Hydronephrosis due to a Migrated Intrauterine Device into the Ureter: A Very Rare Case

Pages
137–138
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Tothe best of our knowledge, this is the third such case reported in the literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Intrauterine device (IUD) insertion is a long-acting and one of the most effective modes of reversible contraception.Complications that most commonly arise following IUD insertion are failed insertion, pain, vasovagalreactions, infection, menstrual abnormalities, and expulsion.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this paper, we present the case of a womanwho experienced hydronephrosis due to the migration of IUD into the ureter after 30 years of insertion.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Tothe best of our knowledge, this is the third such case reported in the literature.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Intrauterine device (IUD) insertion is a long-acting and one of the most effective modes of reversible contraception.Complications that most commonly arise following IUD insertion are failed insertion, pain, vasovagalreactions, infection, menstrual abnormalities, and expulsion. In this paper, we present the case of a womanwho experienced hydronephrosis due to the migration of IUD into the ureter after 30 years of insertion. Tothe best of our knowledge, this is the third such case reported in the literature.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOZKURT, İ. H., DEGİRMENCİ, T., AYDOGDU, O., BASMACI, İ., YONGUC, T., SEFİK, E., AYDIN, M. E. (2022). Hydronephrosis due to a Migrated Intrauterine Device into the Ureter: A Very Rare Case. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2, 137–138. https://ajindex.com/articles/508988

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Winner B, Peipert JF, Zhao Q, et al. Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1998-2007. [CrossRef ] Harrison-Woolrych M, Zhou L, Coulter D. Insertion of intrauterine devices: a comparison of experience with Mirena and Multiload Cu 375 during post-marketing monitoring in New Zealand. N Z Med J 2003; 116: U538. Heinemann K, Reed S, Moehner S, Minh TD. Risk of uterine perforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices in the European Active Surveillance Study on Intrauterine Devices. Contraception 2015; 91: 274-9. [CrossRef] Kaislasuo J, Suhonen S, Gissler M, Lähteenmäki P, Heikinheimo O. Intrauterine contraception: incidence and factors associated with uterine perforation--a population-based study. Hum Reprod 2012; 27: 2658-63. [CrossRef ] Andersson K, Ryde-Blomqvist E, Lindell K, Odlind V, Milsom I. Perforations with intrauterine devices. Report from a Swedish survey. Contraception 1998; 57: 251-5. [CrossRef ] Aydogdu O, Pulat H. Asymptomatic far-migration of an intrauterine device into the abdominal cavity: A rare entity. Can Urol Assoc J 2012; 6: E134-6. [CrossRef ] Zakin D, Stern WZ, Rosenblatt R. Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. I. Classification, complications, mechanism, incidence, and missing string. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1981; 36: 335-53. [CrossRef ] Ferguson CA, Costescu D, Jamieson MA, Jong L. Transmural migration and perforation of a levonorgestrel intrauterine system: a case report and review of the literature. Contraception 2016; 93: 81-6. [CrossRef ] Arslan A, Kanat-Pektas M, Yesilyurt H, Bilge U. Colon penetration by a copper intrauterine device: a case report with literature review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009; 279: 395-7. [CrossRef ] Chang HM, Chen TW, Hsieh CB, et al. Intrauterine contraceptive device appendicitis: a case report. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11: 5414-5. [CrossRef ]