Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2019 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 3

Robotic radical prostatectomy in 93 cases: Outcomes of the first ERUS robotic urology curriculum trained surgeon in Turkey

Pages
183–188
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Of the 40 (43%) patients with no preoperative erectile dysfunction(ED) and with at least three-month follow-up, 18 (45%) had no ED, with or without any additional medication including phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitors.Conclusion: RARP is a safe minimally invasive procedure with acceptable morbidity, excellent operative,pathological and oncological outcomes, and satisfactory functional results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study presents the surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes of the first 93 robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) procedures performed in Erzurum, Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These procedures were performedby a single surgeon who had completed the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section(ERUS) RARP curriculum in an ERUS-certified training center in Ankara.Material and methods: The study present the results of 93 RARP procedures performed by a single surgeon.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Of the 40 (43%) patients with no preoperative erectile dysfunction(ED) and with at least three-month follow-up, 18 (45%) had no ED, with or without any additional medication including phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitors.Conclusion: RARP is a safe minimally invasive procedure with acceptable morbidity, excellent operative,pathological and oncological outcomes, and satisfactory functional results.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: This study presents the surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes of the first 93 robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) procedures performed in Erzurum, Turkey. These procedures were performedby a single surgeon who had completed the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section(ERUS) RARP curriculum in an ERUS-certified training center in Ankara.Material and methods: The study present the results of 93 RARP procedures performed by a single surgeon. The surgeon performing the operations completed an ERUS training program structured for RARPby two robotic surgeons holding ERUS training certificates in an ERUS-approved academic robotic surgerytraining center in Ankara.The RARP cases performed by the surgeon after completion of the training between April 2016 and August 2018 were retrospectively evaluated.Results: The mean patient age was 63.62±7.04 years, and the mean preoperative serum prostate-specificantigen level was 8.34±4.96 ng/mL. Preoperatively, 82 and 4 patients had prostate biopsy Gleason scoresof 3+3 and 4+3, respectively. Bilateral neurovascular bundle (NVB) sparing, unilateral NVB-sparing, andnon-NVB-sparing surgery were performed in 21, 13, and 59 cases, respectively. The mean prostate weightwas 85.34±47.57 g. Posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction was performed in 60 (64.5%) cases. Meanconsole time, intraoperative blood loss, duration of hospital stay, and urethral catheter removal time were170.49±36.50 min, 100.70±34.08 cc, 6.84±2.28 days, and 7.40±3.11 days, respectively. During the perioperative period (0–30 days), five minor (prolonged drain output, n=3; rectocele, n=1; gout arthritis, n=1)and six major (inguinal hernia, n=1; incisional hernia, n=2; anastomotic urinary leakage, n=2; myocardialinfarction, n=1) complications were identified. No complication was detected during postoperative days31–90. Postoperative pathological stages included pT2a, pT2b, and pT2c disease in 77 (82.8%), 9 (9.7%), and7 (7.5%) patients, respectively. The positive surgical margin (SM) rate was 10.7% (n=10), including patientswith pT2a (n=6) and pT2c (n=2) diseases. Eleven (11.8%) patients underwent pelvic lymph node (LN) dissection. The mean LN yield was 16.45±4.29. The mean length of follow-up was 11.17±8.01 months. Biochemical recurrence was observed in two patients, one of whom received maximal androgen blockage (MAB), andthe other one received pelvic radiotherapy+MAB. All the patients with at least one-year follow-up (n=48,51.6%) were fully continent (0 pads/day). Of the 40 (43%) patients with no preoperative erectile dysfunction(ED) and with at least three-month follow-up, 18 (45%) had no ED, with or without any additional medication including phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitors.Conclusion: RARP is a safe minimally invasive procedure with acceptable morbidity, excellent operative,pathological and oncological outcomes, and satisfactory functional results. The ERUS RARP curric

🔖

Cite This Article

BEDİR, F., KESKE, M., DEMİRDÖĞEN, Ş. O., KOCATÜRK, H., KOÇ, E., CANDA, A. E., ATMACA, A. F. (2019). Robotic radical prostatectomy in 93 cases: Outcomes of the first ERUS robotic urology curriculum trained surgeon in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 3, 183–188. https://ajindex.com/articles/379543

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Sağlık İstatistik Yıllığı 2016 Web site
  2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:7-30. [CrossRef] 3. Schröder FH, Carter HB, Wolters T, van den Berg RC, Gosselaar C, Bangma CH, et al. Early detection of prostate cancer in 2007. Part 1: PSA and PSA kinetics. Eur Urol 2008;53:468-77. [CrossRef] 4. Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 2017;71:618-29. [CrossRef] 5. Binder J, Kramer W. Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2001;87:408-10. [CrossRef] 6. Berryhill R Jr, Jhaveri J, Yadav R, Leung R, Rao S, El-Hakim A, et al. Robotic prostatectomy: a review of outcomes compared with laparoscopic and open approaches. Urology 2008;72:15-23. [CrossRef] 7. Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Costello A, Eastham JA, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62:431-52. [CrossRef] 8. Patel VR, Sivaraman A. Current status of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: progress is inevitable. Oncology (Williston Park) 2012;26:616-9, 622.