Journals / Turkish Journal of Physics / 2002 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 6

Measurement of photon-induced K x-rays production cross sections for elements with 62 $\leq Z \leq$74

Pages
483–489
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The experimental results were compared with theoretically predicted values based on relativistic Hartree-Slater and Hartree-Fock theories, a comparison that was found to be in good agreement to within the experimental uncertainties.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:X-ray production cross sections of $K\alpha_1$, $K\alpha_2$, $K\beta'_1$ (= $K\beta{\cal B}_1$ + $K\beta_3$ + $K\beta_5$) and $K\beta'_2$ (= $K\beta_2$ + $K\beta_4$ + transitions from higher levels) lines have been measured and theoretically calculated for six elements with 62 $\leq Z \leq$74 at excitation energy of 78.706 keV, the weighted avarage of K conversion x-rays emitted from Bi.
📊
Key Findings & Data:X-ray production cross sections of $K\alpha_1$, $K\alpha_2$, $K\beta'_1$ (= $K\beta{\cal B}_1$ + $K\beta_3$ + $K\beta_5$) and $K\beta'_2$ (= $K\beta_2$ + $K\beta_4$ + transitions from higher levels) lines have been measured and theoretically calculated for six elements with 62 $\leq Z \leq$74 at excitation energy of 78.706 keV, the weighted avarage of K conversion x-rays emitted from Bi.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The experimental results were compared with theoretically predicted values based on relativistic Hartree-Slater and Hartree-Fock theories, a comparison that was found to be in good agreement to within the experimental uncertainties.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

X-ray production cross sections of $K\alpha_1$, $K\alpha_2$, $K\beta'_1$ (= $K\beta{\cal B}_1$ + $K\beta_3$ + $K\beta_5$) and $K\beta'_2$ (= $K\beta_2$ + $K\beta_4$ + transitions from higher levels) lines have been measured and theoretically calculated for six elements with 62 $\leq Z \leq$74 at excitation energy of 78.706 keV, the weighted avarage of K conversion x-rays emitted from Bi. The experimental results were compared with theoretically predicted values based on relativistic Hartree-Slater and Hartree-Fock theories, a comparison that was found to be in good agreement to within the experimental uncertainties.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEVEN, S. (2002). Measurement of photon-induced K x-rays production cross sections for elements with 62 $\leq Z \leq$74. Turkish Journal of Physics, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 6, 483–489. https://ajindex.com/articles/378294

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (25)

  1. R.L. Watson, M.W. Michael, J. Hernandez, A.K. Leaper and CD. Wendt, Adv. X-Ray Anal, 21, (1978), 105
  2. C.N. Chang and W.H. Su, Nucl. lustrum. Methods, 148, (1978), 561
  3. LA. Al Naser, I.J. Jaber, K.A. Al-Saleh and N.S. Saleh, Appl. Phys. A 43 (Germany), (1987), 71
  4. C. Bhan, S.N. Chaturvedi and N. Nath, X-Ray Spectrom., 10, (1981), 128
  5. M.L. Garg, D.K. Mehta, P.C. Mangal and P.N. Trehan, X-Ray Spectrom., 14, (1985), 165
  6. S. Kumar, S. Singh, D. Mehta, N. Singh, P.C. Mangal and P.N. Trehan, X-Ray Spectrom., 16, (1987), 203
  7. A. Rani, R.K. Koshal, S.N. Chaturvedi and N. Nath, X-Ray Spectrom., 17, (1988), 53
  8. N.S. Saleh, J. Radioanal, Nucl. Chem., 122, (1988)
  9. S. Singly R. Rani, D. Mehta, N. Singh, P.C. Mangal and P.N. Trehan, X-Ray Spectrom., 19, (1990). 155
  10. E. Casnati, C. Baraldi and A. Tartari, Phys. Rev. A 44, (1991) 1699
  11. D.V. Rao, R. Cesareo and G.E. GigaNte, X-Ray Spectrom., 22, (1993) 406
  12. R. Durak, S. Erzeneoğlu, Y. Kurucu and Y. Şahin, Radiation Phys. and Chem., 51, (1998), 45
  13. R. Durak, Physica Scripta, 58, (1998), 111
  14. R. Durak and Y. Ozdemir, Radiation Phys. and Chem., 61, (2001), 19
  15. M.O. Krause, C.W. Nestor, C.J. Sparks and E. Ricci, Oak Ridge National Laboratory ORNL-5399 (1978)
  16. N.S. Saleh and A.J. Abu El-Haija, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 21, (1988), 3077
  17. K.S. Man, N. Singh, R. Mittal, K.L. Allawadhi and B.S. Sood, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 23, (1990), 3521
  18. P. Van Espen, H. Nulles and W. Maenhaut, in Microbeam Analysis, edited by D.E. Newburry (San Francisco Press, San Francisco, 1970), p-265
  19. P. Van Espen, H. Nulles and F. Adams, Nucl. lustrum. Methods, 142, (1977), 243
  20. P. Van Espen, H. Nulles and F. Adams, Nucl. lustrum. Methods, 145, (1977), 579
  21. J.H. Scofield, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory Report UCRL No 51362 (unpublished) 1973 [22] J.H. Hubbell, T.N. Trehan, N. Singh, B. Chand, D. Mehta, M.L. Garg, R.R. Garg, S. Singh and S. Puri, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 23, (1994), 339
  22. D.D. Cohen, Nucl. lustrum. Methods, B, 21, (1980), 111
  23. S. Seven and K. Koçak, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 34, (2001), 2021
  24. J.H. Scofield, At. Data and Nucl. Data Tables, 14, (1974), 121
  25. J.H. Scofield, Phys. Rev. A 9, (1974), 1041.