TheGamow–Teller excitation energies shift downward and new excited states are also obtained in the low-energy region dueto the unblocked transitions at high temperatures.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this work, the effect of temperature on Gamow–Teller strength is investigated using fully self-consistentfinite temperature proton-neutron random phase approximation in the 56Fe nucleus.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The calculations are performedwith Skyrme-type SkM* interaction at T = 0, 1, and 2 MeV.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:TheGamow–Teller excitation energies shift downward and new excited states are also obtained in the low-energy region dueto the unblocked transitions at high temperatures.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Özet
In this work, the effect of temperature on Gamow–Teller strength is investigated using fully self-consistentfinite temperature proton-neutron random phase approximation in the 56Fe nucleus. The calculations are performedwith Skyrme-type SkM* interaction at T = 0, 1, and 2 MeV. It is shown that temperature effects of the occupationprobabilities of states and new excitation channels become possible due to the smearing of the Fermi surface. TheGamow–Teller excitation energies shift downward and new excited states are also obtained in the low-energy region dueto the unblocked transitions at high temperatures.
🔖
Cite This Article
YÜKSEL, E. (2018). Gamow–Teller strength in 56Fe nucleus at finite temperatures. Turkish Journal of Physics, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 5, 613–620. https://ajindex.com/articles/377855
Harakeh, M. N.; Van Der Woude, A. Giant Resonances. Fundamental High-Frequency Modes of Nuclear Excitation; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 2001
Langanke, K.; Martinez-Pinedo, G. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2003, 75, 819-862
Rapaport, J.; Taddeucci, T.; Welch, T. P.; Gaarde, C.; Larsen, J.; Horen, D. J.; Sugarbaker, E.; Koncz, P.; Foster, C. C.; Goodman, C. D. et al. Nucl. Phys. A 1983, 410, 371-398
El-Kateb, S.; Jackson, K. P.; Alford, W. P.; Abegg, R.; Azuma, R. E.; Brown, A.; Celler, A.; Frekers, D.; Hausser, O.; Helmer, R. et al. Phys. Rev. C 1994, 49, 3128-3136
Fracasso, S.; Colò, G. Phys. Rev. C 2007, 76, 044307
Paar, N.; Nikšić, T.; Vretenar, D.; Ring, P. Phys. Rev. C 2004, 69, 054303
Paar, N.; Vretenar, D.; Khan, E.; Colò, G. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2007, 70, 691-793
Babacan, T.; Salamov, D. I.; Küçükbursa, A. Phys. Rev. C 2005, 71, 037303
Çakmak, N.; Ünlü, S.; Selam, C. Pramana J. Phys. 2010, 75, 649-663
Ünlü, S. Phys. Atom. Nuclei 2012, 75, 958-962
Ünlü, S.; Çakmak, N.; Selam, C. Nucl. Phys. A 2017, 957, 491-512
Ikeda, K.; Fujii, S.; Fujita, J. I. Phys. Lett. 1963, 3, 271-272
Nabi, J. U.; Johnson, C. W. J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys. 2013, 40, 065202
Cole, A. L.; Anderson, T. S.; Zegers, R. G. T.; Austin, S. M.; Brown, B. A.; Valdez, L.; Gupta, S.; Hitt, G. W.; Fawwaz, O. Phys. Rev. C 2012, 86, 015809
Caurier, E.; Langanke, K.; Martinez-Pinedo, G.; Nowacki, F. Nucl. Phys. A 1999, 653, 439-452
Nikšić, T.; Marketin, T.; Vretenar, D.; Paar, N.; Ring P. Phys. Rev. C 2005, 71, 014308
Paar, N.; Vretenar, D.; Marketin, T.; Ring, P. Phys. Rev. C 2008, 77, 024608
Nabi, J. U. Astrophys. Space Sci. 2011, 331, 537-554
Niu, Y. F.; Paar, N.; Vretenar, D.; Meng, J. Phys. Rev. C 2011, 83, 045807
Paar, N.; Colò, G.; Khan, E.; Vretenar, D. Phys. Rev. C 2009, 80, 055801
Fantina, A. F.; Paar, N.; Colò, G.; Khan, E.; Vretenar, D. Phys. Rev. C 2012, 86, 035805
Dzhioev, A.; Vdovin, A. I.; Ponomarev, V. Yu.; Wambach, J.; Langanke, K.; Martínez-Pinedo, G. Phys. Rev. C 2010, 81, 015804
Bartel, J.; Quentin, P.; Brack, M.; Guet, C.; Hakansson, H. B. Nucl. Phys. A 1982, 386, 79-100
Niu, Y. F.; Niu, Z. M.; Colò, G.; Vigezzi, E. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 114, 142501
Bonche, P.; Levit, S.; Vautherin, D. Nucl. Phys. A 1984, 427, 278-296
Khan, E.; Van Giai, N.; Sandulescu, N. Nucl. Phys. A 2007, 789, 94-102. [2