Journals / Turkish Journal of Surgery / 2017 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of open appendectomy and laparoscopic appendectomy with laparoscopic intracorporeal knotting and glove endobag techniques: A prospective observational study

Pages
258–266
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

By using these techniques, the use of expensive instruments can be avoided when performing laparoscopic appendectomy

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Despite the recent increase in the use of laparoscopic appendectomy procedures to treat acute appendicitis, laparoscopic appendectomy is not necessarily the best treatment modality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 was treated with laparoscopic appendectomy using laparoscopic intracorpreal knotting and glove endobag (n=36) and group 2 was treated with open appendectomy (n=36).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:By using these techniques, the use of expensive instruments can be avoided when performing laparoscopic appendectomy
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Despite the recent increase in the use of laparoscopic appendectomy procedures to treat acute appendicitis, laparoscopic appendectomy is not necessarily the best treatment modality. The aim of this study is to examine the value of laparoscopic intracorporeal knotting and glove endobag in terms of various parameters and in terms of reducing the costs related to laparoscopic appendectomy procedures. Material and Methods: Seventy-two acute appendicitis patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy surgery were enrolled in the study and were evaluated prospectively. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 was treated with laparoscopic appendectomy using laparoscopic intracorpreal knotting and glove endobag (n=36) and group 2 was treated with open appendectomy (n=36). The two groups were statistically compared in terms of preoperative symptoms and signs, laboratory and imaging findings, operation time and technique, pain score, gas and stool outputs, duration of hospital stay, return to normal activity, and complications. Results: No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in relation to gender, age, body mass index, or pre-operation findings, which included loss of appetite, vomiting, time when pain started, displacement of pain, defense, rebound, imaging methods, and laboratory and pathology examinations (p>0.05). Moreover, there were no differences between the groups with respect to drain usage, hospital stay time, or complications (p>0.05). In contrast, a statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of operation time, pain scores, gas-stool outputs, and return to normal activity in the laparoscopic appendectomy group (p=0.001).Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy can be performed in a facile, safe, and cost-effective manner with laparoscopic intracorporeal knotting and glove endobag. By using these techniques, the use of expensive instruments can be avoided when performing laparoscopic appendectomy

🔖

Cite This Article

AZİRET, M., ÇETİNKÜNAR, S., ERDEM, H., KAHRAMANCA, Ş., BOZKURT, H., DÜLGEROĞLU, O., YILDIRIM, A. C., İRKÖRÜCÜ, O., GÖLBOYU, E. B. (2017). Comparison of open appendectomy and laparoscopic appendectomy with laparoscopic intracorporeal knotting and glove endobag techniques: A prospective observational study. Turkish Journal of Surgery, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 4, 258–266. https://ajindex.com/articles/376515

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 1990
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Flum DR, Morris A, Koepsell T, Dellinger EP. Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis. JAMA 2001
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Brunicardi FC, Andersen DK, Billiar TR, Dunn DL, Hunter JG, Matthews JB, Pollock RE. The Appendix. In Schwart'z principles of surgery. 9nd ed. 2010
  4. p.1074-1078. 4. McBurney IV C. The incision made in the abdominal wall in cases of appendicitis, with a description of a new method of operating. Ann Surg 1894
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 1983
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Hansen JB, Smithers BM, Schache D, Wall DR, Miller BJ, Menzies BL. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. World J Surg 1996
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Temple LK, Litwin DE, McLeod RS. A meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. Can J Surg 1999
  8. Korndorffer Jr, Fellinger E, Reed W. SAGES guideline for laparo-scopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc 2010
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Reiertsen O, Larsen S, Trondsen E, Edwin B, Faerden AE, Rosseland AR. Randomized controlled trial with sequential design of lap¬aroscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Br J Surg 1997
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Heikkinen TJ, Haukipura K, Hulkko A. Cost-effective appendectomy: open or laparoscopic? A prospective, randomized study. Surg Endosc 1998
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Hanssen A, Plotnikov S, Dubois R. Laparoscopic appendectomy using a polymeric clip to close the appendicular stump. JSLS 2007
  12. Beldi G, Vorburger SA, Bruegger LE, Kocher T, Inderbitzin D, Candinas D. Analysis of stapling versus endoloops in appendiceal stump closure. Br J Surg 2006
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Moreno M, Magos FJ, Arcovedo R, Olachea P, Palacios JA, Salazar A, et al. Comparison of the perfor-mance of the Gea extracorporeal knot with the Roeder extracorporeal knot and the classical knot. Surg Endosc 2004
  14. [CrossRef] 14. Delibegović S, Matović E. Hem-o-lok plastic clips in securing of the base of the appendix during laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc 2009
  15. [CrossRef] 15. Ay N, Dinç B, Alp V, Kaya Ş, Sevük U. Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic intracorporeal knotting technique in patients with complicated an