Journals / Turkish Journal of Surgery / 2018 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 1

Management of iatrogenic injuries due to endoscopic sphincterotomy: Surgical or conservative approaches

Pages
24–27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

One patient (5%) with type I injury died of multiorgan deficiency.Conclusion: With close close clinical follow-up, medical treatment can be beneficial for most patients, and surgicalprocedures should be reserved for patients with type I (definite) and type II/III injuries; in patients with these clinicalparameters, conservative management will likely be unsuccessful.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The best therapeutic approach for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforationsremains controversial; while some authors suggest routine conservative management, others advocate mandatorysurgical exploration.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We aimed to evaluate our clinical experience of perforations during endoscopic sphincterotomy.Material and Methods: A retrospective chart review from January 2010 to October 2015 identified 20 patientswith endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:One patient (5%) with type I injury died of multiorgan deficiency.Conclusion: With close close clinical follow-up, medical treatment can be beneficial for most patients, and surgicalprocedures should be reserved for patients with type I (definite) and type II/III injuries; in patients with these clinicalparameters, conservative management will likely be unsuccessful.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The best therapeutic approach for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforationsremains controversial; while some authors suggest routine conservative management, others advocate mandatorysurgical exploration. We aimed to evaluate our clinical experience of perforations during endoscopic sphincterotomy.Material and Methods: A retrospective chart review from January 2010 to October 2015 identified 20 patientswith endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforations. Data collection included demographics,time to diagnosis, type of perforation, treatment strategy, surgical procedure, complications, hospital stay, andoutcome. All patients were classified into two groups on the basis of radiological and operative findings.Results: Only five patients underwent surgical treatment, whereas 15 patients were managed conservatively. Themean time to diagnosis was 7.8 hrs (range: 1 to 36 hrs). In patients who underwent surgical treatment, the types ofperforations included type I and III in one patient each and type II in three patients. Surgical procedures includedlaparoscopic and open cholecystectomy with t-tube drainage in two patients each and primary repair of duodenalinjury with hepaticojejunostomy in one patient. Among conservatively managed patients, eight, four, and three hadtype II, type III, and type IV injuries, respectively. Of these 15 patients, 60% (n=9) underwent percutaneous procedures.The mean length of hospital stay was similar for conservatively and surgically treated patients (12 vs. 12.4days, respectively, p=0.790). One patient (5%) with type I injury died of multiorgan deficiency.Conclusion: With close close clinical follow-up, medical treatment can be beneficial for most patients, and surgicalprocedures should be reserved for patients with type I (definite) and type II/III injuries; in patients with these clinicalparameters, conservative management will likely be unsuccessful.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOSTANCI, Ö., BATTAL, M., YAZICI, P., DEMİR, U., ALKIM, C. (2018). Management of iatrogenic injuries due to endoscopic sphincterotomy: Surgical or conservative approaches. Turkish Journal of Surgery, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 1, 24–27. https://ajindex.com/articles/376503

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. McCune WS, Shorb PE, Moscovitz H. Endoscopic cannulation of the ampulla of vater: a preliminary report. Ann Surg 1968; 167: 752-756. [CrossRef] Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME, Dorsher PJ, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. New Engl J Med 1996; 335: 909-918. [CrossRef] Silviera ML, Seamon MJ, Porshinsky B, Prosciak MP, Doraiswamy VA, Wang CF, et al. Complications related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a comprehensive clinical review. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2009; 18: 73-82.
  2. Lai CH, Lau WY. Management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography- related perforation. Surgeon 2008; 6: 45-48. [CrossRef] Freeman ML. Adverse outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: avoidance and management. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2003; 13: 775-798. [CrossRef] Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, Chilovi F, Costan F, De Berardinis F, et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48: 1-10. [CrossRef] Cotton PB, Garrow DA, Gallagher J, Romagnuolo J. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 80-88. [CrossRef] Scarlett PY, Falk GL. The management of perforation of the duodenum following endoscopic sphincterotomy: a proposal for selective therapy. ANZ J Surg 1994; 64: 843-846. [CrossRef] Cho KB. The management of endoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatography- relatedduodenalperforation. Clin Endosc 2014; 47: 341-345. [CrossRef] Stapfer M, Selby RR, Stain SC, Katkhouda N, Parekh D, Jabbour N, et al. Management of duodenal perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy. Ann Surg 2000; 232: 191-198. [CrossRef] Howard TJ, Tan T, Lehman GA, Sherman S, Madura JA, Fogel E, et al. Classification and management of perforations complicating endoscopic sphincterotomy. Surgery 1999; 126: 658-663. [CrossRef] Koc B, Bircan HY, Adas G, Kemik O, Akcakaya A, Yavuz A, Karahan S. Complications following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: minimal invasive surgical recommendations. PLoSOne 2014; 26: e113073. [CrossRef] Kodali S, Mönkemüller K, Kim H, Ramesh J, Trevino J, Varadarajulu S, et al. ERCP-related perforations in the new millennium: A large tertiary referral center 10-year experience. United European Gastroenterol J 2015; 3: 25-30. [CrossRef] Kirtane T, Singhal S. Endoscopic c