Journals / Turkish Journal of Surgery / 2017 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1

The clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors of gastroesophageal junction tumors according to Siewert classification

Pages
18–24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While the median overall survival and2-year overall survival rate were 26.6 months and 39.6%, the median disease free survival and disease free survivalrates were 16.5 months and 30.1%, respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The treatment of gastroesophageal junction tumors remains controversial due to confusion on whetherthey should be considered as primary esophageal or as gastric tumors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The incidence of these tumors with poorprognosis has increased, thus creating scientific interest on gastroesophageal cancers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While the median overall survival and2-year overall survival rate were 26.6 months and 39.6%, the median disease free survival and disease free survivalrates were 16.5 months and 30.1%, respectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The treatment of gastroesophageal junction tumors remains controversial due to confusion on whetherthey should be considered as primary esophageal or as gastric tumors. The incidence of these tumors with poorprognosis has increased, thus creating scientific interest on gastroesophageal cancers. Esophagogastric cancers areclassified according to their location by Siewert, and the treatment of each type varies. We evaluated the prognosticfactors and differences in clinicopathologic factors of patients with gastroesophageal junction tumor, who havebeen treated and followed-up in our clinics.Material and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 187 patients with gastroesophageal junction tumors who havebeen operated and treated in the Oncology Department between 2005 and 2014. The chi-square test was used toevaluate differences in clinicopathologic factors among Siewert groups I, II and III. Prognostic factors were analyzedby univariate and multivariate analysis.Results: The median age of our patients was 62 years, and approximately 70% was male. Nineteen patients (10.2%)had Siewert I tumors, 40 (21.4%) II, and the remaining 128 (64.4%) had Siewert III tumors. Siewert III tumors were atmore advanced pathologic and T stages. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy was mostly applied to Siewert group I patients. There was no difference between the 3 groups in terms of recurrence. While the median overall survival and2-year overall survival rate were 26.6 months and 39.6%, the median disease free survival and disease free survivalrates were 16.5 months and 30.1%, respectively. The N stage, pathologic stage, vascular invasion, lymphatic invasion,perineural invasion, surgical margin, and grade were associated with both overall survival and disease free survival,while pathologic stage and presence of recurrence were significant factors for overall survival. The median diseasefree survival for Siewert III tumors was 20 months, 11.3 month for Siewert I tumors, and 14 months for Siewert IItumors, but the finding was not statistically significant (p=0.08).Conclusion: Although gastroesophageal junction tumors were grouped according to their location and they exerteddifferent clinicopathologic properties, their prognosis was similar.

🔖

Cite This Article

USTAALİOĞLU, B. B. Ö., TİLKİ, M., SÜRMELİOĞLU, A., BİLİCİ, A., GÖNEN, C., USTAALİOĞLU, R., BALVAN, Ö., ALİUSTAOĞLU, M. (2017). The clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors of gastroesophageal junction tumors according to Siewert classification. Turkish Journal of Surgery, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1, 18–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/376492

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Fox MP, van Berkel V. Management of gastroesophageal junction tumors. Surg Clin North Am 2012; 92: 1199-1212. [CrossRef] Leers JM, DeMeester SR, Chan N, Ayazi S, Oezcelik A, Abate E, et al. Clinical characteristics, biologic behavior, and survival after esophagectomy are similar for adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction and the distal esophagus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 138: 594-602. [CrossRef] Siewert JR, Stein H. Adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: classification, pathology and extent of resection. Dis Esophagus 1996: 9: 173-182.
  2. Rüdiger Siewert J, Feith M, Werner M, Stein HJ. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: results of surgical therapy based on anatomical/topographic classification in 1,002 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 2000; 232: 353-361. [CrossRef] Kleinberg L. Therapy for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: optimizing outcome. Semin Radiat Oncol 2013; 23: 38-50. [CrossRef] Johansson J, Djerf P, Oberg S, Zilling T, von Holstein CS, Johnsson F, et al. Two different surgical approaches in the treatment of adenocarcinoma at the gastroesophageal junction. World J Surg 2008; 32: 1013-1020. [CrossRef] Feith M, Stein HJ, Siewert JR. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: surgical therapy based on 1602 consecutive resected patients. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2006; 15: 751-764. [CrossRef] Okholm C, Svendsen LB, Achiam MP. Status and prognosis of lymph node metastasis in patients with cardia cancer - a systematic review. Surg Oncol 2014; 23: 140-146. [CrossRef] Westerterp M, Koppert LB, Buskens CJ, Tilanus HW, ten Kate FJ, Bergman JJ, et al. Outcome of surgical treatment for early adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastro-esophageal junction. Virchows Arch 2005; 446: 497-504. [CrossRef] Bai JG, Lv Y, Dang CX. Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction in China according to Siewert’s classification. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2006; 36: 364-367. [CrossRef] Gronnier C, Piessen G, Mariette C. Diagnosis and treatment of non-metastatic esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: what are the current options? J Visc Surg 2012; 149: e23-33. [CrossRef] An JY, Baik YH, Choi MG, Noh JH, Sohn TS, Bae JM, et al. The prognosis of gastric cardia cancer after R0 resection. Am J Surg 2010; 199: 725-729. [CrossRef] Abate E, DeMeester SR, Zehetner J, Oezcelik A, Ayazi S, Costales J, et al. Recurrence after esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma: defining optimal follow-up intervals and testing. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 2