SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish journal of vascular surgery / 2019 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2

Applicability of ASA classification system in elective endovascular aneurysm repair

Bahadır AYTEKİN
Bekir Boğaçhan AKKAYA
Metin YILMAZ
Ferit ÇETİNKAYA
Nevriye SALMAN
Ertekin Utku ÜNAL
Hakkı Zafer İŞCAN
Mehmet Ali ÖZATİK
Pages
101–106
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Early and postoperative one-yearmortality and morbidity were evaluated.Results: The overall early mortality rate was 1.4%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to examine the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification of Physical Status as a preoperativerisk prediction method for early mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of aninfrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).Patients and methods: A total of 134 consecutive patients (124 males, 10 females; mean age 69.6±6.9 years; range, 52 to 85 years) with aninfrarenal AAA who underwent EVAR between January 2012 and January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The patients were dividedinto two groups as Group 1 (low risk; ASA I-II; n=63) and Group 2 (high risk; ASA III-IV; n=71).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Early and postoperative one-yearmortality and morbidity were evaluated.Results: The overall early mortality rate was 1.4%.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: This study aims to examine the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification of Physical Status as a preoperativerisk prediction method for early mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of aninfrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).Patients and methods: A total of 134 consecutive patients (124 males, 10 females; mean age 69.6±6.9 years; range, 52 to 85 years) with aninfrarenal AAA who underwent EVAR between January 2012 and January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were dividedinto two groups as Group 1 (low risk; ASA I-II; n=63) and Group 2 (high risk; ASA III-IV; n=71). Early and postoperative one-yearmortality and morbidity were evaluated.Results: The overall early mortality rate was 1.4%. None of the patients were converted to open surgery and overall technical success was100%. Unibody grafts were performed in 33% patients in Group 1 and 59.2% patients in Group 2 (p=0.003). The length of intensive careunit and hospital stay was longer in Group 2, although it did not reach statistical significance. A total of 64% of local/locoregional anesthesiawas performed in Group 2 high-risk patients.Conclusion: Regardless of the ASA risk group, EVAR can be performed successfully. The ASA classification may be useful for decision oftreatment modality. Patients unfit for open surgery can be managed safely by EVAR.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYTEKİN, B., AKKAYA, B. B., YILMAZ, M., ÇETİNKAYA, F., SALMAN, N., ÜNAL, E. U., İŞCAN, H. Z., ÖZATİK, M. A. (2019). Applicability of ASA classification system in elective endovascular aneurysm repair. Turkish journal of vascular surgery, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2, 101–106. https://ajindex.com/articles/375770

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Patel R, Sweeting MJ, Powell JT, Greenhalgh RM. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 15-years’ follow-up of the UK endovascular aneurysm repair trial 1 (EVAR trial 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016;388:2366-74
  2. Akbulut M, Aksoy E, Kara İ, Çelik EC, Rabuş MB, Çekmecelioğlu D, et al. Comparison of short- and mid-term results of open surgery versus endovascular stent graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Turk J Vasc Surg 2017;26:5-11
  3. Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, Bossone E, Bartolomeo RD, Eggebrecht H, et al. 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: Document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2014;35:2873-926
  4. Wolters U, Wolf T, Stützer H, Schröder T. ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome. Br J Anaesth 1996;77:217-22
  5. Irlbeck T, Zwißler B, Bauer A. ASA classification: Transition in the course of time and depiction in the literature. Anaesthesist 2017;66:5-10
  6. Bohm N, Wales L, Dunckley M, Morgan R, Loftus I, Thompson M. Objective risk-scoring systems for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: applicability in endovascular repair? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008;36:172-7
  7. Patterson BO, Holt PJ, Hinchliffe R, Loftus IM, Thompson MM. Predicting risk in elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a systematic review of current evidence. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008;36:637-45
  8. Patterson BO, Holt PJ, Hinchliffe R, Nordon IM, Loftus IM, Thompson MM. Existing risk prediction methods for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair do not predict short-term outcome following endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg 2010;52:25-30
  9. American society of Anesthesiologist, Inc. New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 1963;24:111
  10. Prause G, Ratzenhofer-Comenda B, Pierer G, SmolleJüttner F, Glanzer H, Smolle J. Can ASA grade or Goldman's cardiac risk index predict peri-operative mortality? A study of 16,227 patients. Anaesthesia 1997;52:203-6
  11. Boult M, Maddern G, Barnes M, Fitridge R. Factors affecting survival after endovascular aneurysm repair: results from a population based audit. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007;34:156-62
  12. Barnes M, Boult M, Maddern G, Fitridge R. A model to predict outcomes for endovascular aneurysm repair using preop