Journals / Turkish journal of vascular surgery / 2020 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1

The effect of referral and transfer of patients with acute type A aortic dissection on treatment outcomes

Pages
19–25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall hospital mortality rate was 23.2%(p=0.310).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the effect of referral and transfer of patients with acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD) andtreatment outcomes in the emergency setting.Patients and methods: A total of 131 patients (75 males, 56 females; mean age 52.2±13.1 years; range, 18 to 80 years) who underwent surgerydue to AAAD in the emergency setting in our center between January 2010 and December 2017 were included in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The patientswere divided into two groups as those who were diagnosed with AAAD in another health care facility and transferred to our hospital (GroupA, n=65) and those who were diagnosed in our emergency room (Group B, n=66).Results: The rate of postoperative neurological complications was 24.6% in Group A and 12.1% in Group B (p=0.74).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall hospital mortality rate was 23.2%(p=0.310).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the effect of referral and transfer of patients with acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD) andtreatment outcomes in the emergency setting.Patients and methods: A total of 131 patients (75 males, 56 females; mean age 52.2±13.1 years; range, 18 to 80 years) who underwent surgerydue to AAAD in the emergency setting in our center between January 2010 and December 2017 were included in the study. The patientswere divided into two groups as those who were diagnosed with AAAD in another health care facility and transferred to our hospital (GroupA, n=65) and those who were diagnosed in our emergency room (Group B, n=66).Results: The rate of postoperative neurological complications was 24.6% in Group A and 12.1% in Group B (p=0.74). The postoperativepersistent neurological deficit rate was 10.5% in Group A and 9% in Group B (p=0.456). The overall hospital mortality rate was 23.2%(p=0.310). Hemodynamic instability, age, and cardiopulmonary bypass time were independent risk factors for overall hospital mortality.Conclusion: Although the patients diagnosed with AAAD in another healthcare facility were hemodynamically unstable compared to thosediagnosed in our center, the mortality and morbidity rates did not significantly differ. Based on our study results, we recommend transferringsuch patients to a reference hospital.

🔖

Cite This Article

KADİROĞULLARI, E., ŞEN, O., GÖDE, S., BAYRAM, M., BUĞRA, A., TİMUR, B., KUTLUK, E., AYDIN, Ü., ONAN, B. (2020). The effect of referral and transfer of patients with acute type A aortic dissection on treatment outcomes. Turkish journal of vascular surgery, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1, 19–25. https://ajindex.com/articles/375751

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Lauterbach SR, Cambria RP, Brewster DC, Gertler JP, Lamuraglia GM, Isselbacher EM, et al. Contemporary management of aortic branch compromise resulting from acute aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg 2001;33:1185-92
  2. LeMaire SA, Russell L. Epidemiology of thoracic aortic dissection. Nat Rev Cardiol 2011;8:103-13
  3. Svensson LG, Kouchoukos NT, Miller DC, Bavaria JE, Coselli JS, Curi MA, et al. Expert consensus document on the treatment of descending thoracic aortic disease using endovascular stent-grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85(1 Suppl):S1-41
  4. Lai DT, Robbins RC, Mitchell RS, Moore KA, Oyer PE, Shumway NE, et al. Does profound hypothermic circulatory arrest improve survival in patients with acute type a aortic dissection? Circulation 2002;106(12 Suppl 1):I218-28
  5. Tsai TT, Trimarchi S, Nienaber CA. Acute aortic dissection: perspectives from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009;37:149-59
  6. Lee TC, Kon Z, Cheema FH, Grau-Sepulveda MV, Englum B, Kim S, et al. Contemporary management and outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection: An analysis of the STS adult cardiac surgery database. J Card Surg 2018;33:7-18
  7. Harris KM, Strauss CE, Duval S, Unger BT, Kroshus TJ, Inampudi S, et al. Multidisciplinary standardized care for acute aortic dissection: design and initial outcomes of a regional care model. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2010;3:424-30
  8. Daily PO, Trueblood HW, Stinson EB, Wuerflein RD, Shumway NE. Management of acute aortic dissections. Ann Thorac Surg 1970;10:237-47
  9. Wiedemann D, Kocher A, Dorfmeister M, Vadehra A, Mahr S, Laufer G, et al. Effect of cerebral protection strategy on outcome of patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;146:647-55
  10. Arsalan M, Squiers JJ, Herbert MA, MacHannaford JC, Chamogeorgakis T, Prince SL, et al. Comparison of Outcomes of Operative Therapy for Acute Type A Aortic Dissections Provided at High-Volume Versus LowVolume Medical Centers in North Texas. Am J Cardiol 2017;119:323-7
  11. Etz CD, von Aspern K, da Rocha E Silva J, Girrbach FF, Leontyev S, Luehr M, et al. Impact of perfusion strategy on outcome after repair for acute type a aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg 2014;97:78-85
  12. Omura A, Miyahara S, Yamanaka K, Sakamoto T, Matsumori M, Okada K, et al. Early and late outcomes of repaired acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection after graft replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;151:341-8
  13. David TE, A