Journals / Turkish journal of vascular surgery / 2020 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

Current treatment of peripheral infected wounds: Our vacuum-assisted closure experiences

Pages
95–100
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is an ideal method to be used throughout surgery to fight against surgical site infections.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: In this study, we present our experiences on peripheral vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) applications in our clinic.Patients and methods: Between January 2012 and December 2019, a total of 64 patients (40 males, 24 females; mean age 67.9 years; range,35 to 94 years) undergoing peripheral VAC therapy were retrospectively analyzed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The VAC system was changed at weekly intervals, untila negative culture was obtained or laboratory values returned to normal ranges and were not suggestive of infections.Results: In 16 patients (25%), the main indication for VAC was previous femoral pseudoaneurysm repair.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is an ideal method to be used throughout surgery to fight against surgical site infections.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: In this study, we present our experiences on peripheral vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) applications in our clinic.Patients and methods: Between January 2012 and December 2019, a total of 64 patients (40 males, 24 females; mean age 67.9 years; range,35 to 94 years) undergoing peripheral VAC therapy were retrospectively analyzed. The VAC system was changed at weekly intervals, untila negative culture was obtained or laboratory values returned to normal ranges and were not suggestive of infections.Results: In 16 patients (25%), the main indication for VAC was previous femoral pseudoaneurysm repair. Escherichia coli was the mostcommonly isolated strain from the wound site. The mean length of hospital stay was 54.1 days.Conclusion: Peripheral wound infections cause a significant increase in the length of hospital stay, cost, and mortality. Vacuum-assistedclosure applications may reduce these rates. It is an ideal method to be used throughout surgery to fight against surgical site infections.

🔖

Cite This Article

İYİGÜN, T., TİMUR, B., ÖZGÜL, S. G., APAYDIN, Z., ÜSTÜNIŞIK, Ç. T., ÜNAL, D. A. (2020). Current treatment of peripheral infected wounds: Our vacuum-assisted closure experiences. Turkish journal of vascular surgery, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 95–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/375746

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Morykwas MJ, Argenta LC, Shelton-Brown EI, McGuirt W. Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: animal studies and basic foundation. Ann Plast Surg 1997;38:553-62
  2. Nordmyr J, Svensson S, Björck M, Acosta S. Vacuum assisted wound closure in patients with lower extremity arterial disease. The experience from two tertiary referralcentres. Int Angiol 2009;28:26-31
  3. V.A.C. Therapy Clinical Guidelines- A reference source for clinicians. 2-B-128-CA-EN Rev B 12/2014. Available at: https://www.acelity.com/-/media/Project/Acelity/ Acelity-Base-Sites/shared/PDF/2-b-128-ca-enb-clinicalguidelines---canada---en.pdf 4. Turtiainen J, Saimanen E, Partio T, Kärkkäinen J, Kiviniemi V, Mäkinen K, et al. Surgical wound infections after vascular surgery: prospective multicenter observational study. Scand J Surg 2010;99:167-72. 5. de Lissovoy G, Fraeman K, Hutchins V, Murphy D, Song D, Vaughn BB. Surgical site infection: incidence and impact on hospital utilization and treatment costs. Am J Infect Control 2009;37:387-97
  4. Murphy P, Lee K, Dubois L, DeRose G, Forbes T, Power A. Negative pressure wound therapy for highrisk wounds in lower extremity revascularization: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2015;16:504
  5. Svensson S, Monsen C, Kölbel T, Acosta S. Predictors for outcome after vacuum assisted closure therapy of perivascular surgical site infections in the groin. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008;36:84-9
  6. Schintler MV. Negative pressure therapy: theory and practice. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2012;28:72-7
  7. Okonkwo UA, DiPietro LA. Diabetes and Wound Angiogenesis. Int J Mol Sci 2017;18. pii: E1419
  8. Altabas V. Diabetes, Endothelial Dysfunction, and Vascular Repair: What Should a Diabetologist Keep His Eye on? Int J Endocrinol 2015;2015:848272
  9. Albrant D. Management of foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. Am Pharm Assoc 2000;40:467-74
  10. Brehm V, Steenvoorde P, Oskam J. Regarding “Preservation of infected and exposed vascular grafts using vacuum assisted closure without muscle flap coverage”. J Vasc Surg 2006;44:226
  11. Roberts AD, Simon GL. Diabetic foot infections: the role of microbiology and antibiotic treatment. Semin Vasc Surg 2012;25:75-81
  12. Aysert Yıldız P, Özdil T, Dizbay M, Güzel Tunçcan Ö, Hızel K. Peripheral arterial disease increases the risk of multidrug-resistant bacteria and amputation in diabetic foot infections. Turk J Med Sci 2018;48:845-50
  13. Naz I, Walters ET, Janhofer DE, Penz