Journals / Turkish journal of vascular surgery / 2020 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

Carotid endarterectomy under local anesthesia: An institutional report of experience

Pages
101–106
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This technique also allows implementation of a staged procedure early after the operation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to present our personal single-surgeon experience regarding carotid endarterectomy (CEA) proceduresperformed under local anesthesia.Patients and methods: Between January 2007 and December 2012, a total of 215 CEA procedures in 203 patients (164 males, 39 females;mean age 66.5±7.9 years; range, 43 to 85 years) were retrospectively analyzed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Local anesthesia was achieved with single bolus injection of10 mL of 2% prilocaine.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This technique also allows implementation of a staged procedure early after the operation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: This study aims to present our personal single-surgeon experience regarding carotid endarterectomy (CEA) proceduresperformed under local anesthesia.Patients and methods: Between January 2007 and December 2012, a total of 215 CEA procedures in 203 patients (164 males, 39 females;mean age 66.5±7.9 years; range, 43 to 85 years) were retrospectively analyzed. Local anesthesia was achieved with single bolus injection of10 mL of 2% prilocaine. An awake test was performed for three min following arterial clamping. Arteriotomy line was closed primarily ina continuous fashion. An intraluminal shunt was used in patients who developed neurological symptoms during the awake clamp testing.Results: Twelve patients (5.9%) underwent staged CEA for bilateral disease and 88 patients (43.3%) underwent coronary artery bypassgrafting following the initial CEA. None of procedures converted to general anesthesia. Transient ischemic attack developed in five patients(2.4%), cerebral infarction in five patients (2.4%), myocardial infarction in two patients (0.98%), and a neck hematoma in six patients (2.9%).Revision for neck hematoma within the first 24 hours was required in two patients (0.98%). The mean follow-up was 40.1±6.6 months. Twopatients (0.98%) had significant restenosis within two years and one of them underwent repeated CEA. There were five late mortalities(2.4%). The patency rate was 99% during follow-up.Conclusion: Low complication rates and excellent patency rates can be achieved using local anesthesia during CEA for isolated unilateralcarotid stenosis. This technique also allows implementation of a staged procedure early after the operation.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARAÇ, A., JAHOLLARI, A. (2020). Carotid endarterectomy under local anesthesia: An institutional report of experience. Turkish journal of vascular surgery, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 101–106. https://ajindex.com/articles/375723

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Lichtman JH, Jones MR, Leifheit EC, Sheffet AJ, Howard G, Lal BK, et al. Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in the US Medicare Population, 1999- 2014. JAMA 2017;318:1035-46
  2. Mantz F, Thibaud D, Munier P. Carotid surgery in private practice: what kind of change in the last 15 years? Ann Vasc Surg 2014;28:239-44
  3. Tangkanakul C, Counsell C, Warlow C. Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;2:CD000126
  4. Cho J, Lee KK, Yun WS, Kim HK, Hwang YH, Huh S. Selective shunt during carotid endarterectomy using routine awake test with respect to a lower shunt rate. J Korean Surg Soc 2013;84:238-44
  5. Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Antoniou SA, Torella F, Antoniou GA. Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of local vs. general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy. Anaesthesia 2018;73:1280-9
  6. Liapis CD, Bell PR, Mikhailidis D, Sivenius J, Nicolaides A, Fernandes e Fernandes J, et al. ESVS guidelines. Invasive treatment for carotid stenosis: indications, techniques. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009;37:1-19
  7. Hertzer NR, Young JR, Beven EG, Graor RA, O'Hara PJ, Ruschhaupt WF 3rd, et al. Coronary angiography in 506 patients with extracranial cerebrovascular disease. Arch Intern Med 1985;145:849-52
  8. Schwartz LB, Bridgman AH, Kieffer RW, Wilcox RA, McCann RL, Tawil MP, et al. Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis and stroke in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. J Vasc Surg 1995;21:146-53
  9. Rerkasem K, Rothwell PM. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of patch angioplasty versus primary closure and different types of patch materials during carotid endarterectomy. Asian J Surg 2011;34:32-40
  10. Cao PG, de Rango P, Zannetti S, Giordano G, Ricci S, Celani MG. Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy for preventing stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;1:CD001921
  11. Harrison GJ, How TV, Poole RJ, Brennan JA, Naik JB, Vallabhaneni SR, et al. Closure technique after carotid endarterectomy influences local hemodynamics. J Vasc Surg 2014;60:418-27
  12. İyigün T, Kyaruzi M, Timur B, İyigün M, Aydın Ü. Our midterm restenosis results using patch angioplasty closure versus primary closure in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: A comparative study. Turk J Vasc Surg 2019;28:19-23
  13. GALA Trial Collaborative Group, Lewis SC, Warlow CP, Bodenham AR, Colam B, Rothwell PM, et al. General anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for carotid surgery (GALA): a multi