Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry / 2015 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Supporting a Hearing Impaired Child s Literacy Development With Language Experience Approach

İşitme Engelli Bir Çocuğun Okuma Yazma Becerilerinin Dil Deneyim Yaklaşımı İle Desteklenmesi

Pages
111–144
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results suggest LEA; creates opportunities for oral language development, facilitates using oral cues and expression of thoughts (both oral and written), enables probing vocabulary and syntax problems and provides opportunities for preparing individualized activities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Language Experience Approach (LEA) emphasizes the synergy among listening, speaking, reading and writing skills and suggests considering learners experiences while preparing reading materials.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of the current study is to investigate LEA s supportive role in a hearing impaired child s literacy development.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results suggest LEA; creates opportunities for oral language development, facilitates using oral cues and expression of thoughts (both oral and written), enables probing vocabulary and syntax problems and provides opportunities for preparing individualized activities.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Language Experience Approach (LEA) emphasizes the synergy among listening, speaking, reading and writing skills and suggests considering learners experiences while preparing reading materials. The aim of the current study is to investigate LEA s supportive role in a hearing impaired child s literacy development. In line with this aim the study modeled as an action research. Participants of the study are teacher researcher, validity committee members, a hearing impaired child (studying second grade), and the child s teacher. Data sources of the study are researcher s diary, documents, interviews, activity plans, activities video records and informal evaluations. Findings suggest that the process emerged is two phases. The first phase is writing and talking about events in sequences cards, whereas the second phase covers word banks and syntax activities. The results suggest LEA; creates opportunities for oral language development, facilitates using oral cues and expression of thoughts (both oral and written), enables probing vocabulary and syntax problems and provides opportunities for preparing individualized activities.

Özet

Dil Deneyim Yaklaşımı; dinleme, konuşma, okuma ve yazma becerilerinin bir arada kullanılması ve okuma materyallerinin öğrencilerin deneyimleriyle oluşturulması temeline dayanmaktadır. Bu araştırmanın amacı, işitme engelli bir çocuğun okuma yazma becerilerinin gelişiminin Dil Deneyim Yaklaşımı ile desteklenme sürecinin incelenmesidir. Araştırma, bu amaç doğrultusunda, eylem araştırması şeklinde desenlenmiştir. Araştırmanın katılımcıları; araştırmacı öğretmen, geçerlik komitesi üyeleri, ilkokul 2. sınıfa devam eden işitme engelli bir öğrenci ve sınıf öğretmenidir. Araştırma verileri; araştırmacı günlüğü, belgeler, görüşmeler, uygulama planları, uygulama videoteyp kayıtları ve formel olmayan değerlendirmeler kullanılarak elde edilmiştir. Araştırma bulguları, sürecin iki evrede gerçekleştiğini göstermektedir. Bu evreler; sıralı kartlardaki olayların sözlü ve yazılı dille paylaşılması ile kelime bankası ve sözdizimi etkinliğidir. Araştırma sonuçları; dil deneyim uygulamalarının sözlü dilin gelişmesi için fırsatlar sağladığını, sözel ipuçlarının kullanılmasına, düşüncelerin sözlü ve yazılı dille ifade edilmesine olanak verdiğini, sözcük dağarcığı ve sözdizimine ilişkin ihtiyaçların belirlenmesini sağlayarak öğrencinin düzeyine uygun etkinliklerin hazırlanmasına fırsat sağladığını göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARASU, H. P., GİRGİN, Ü., GÜRGÜR, H. (2015). Supporting a Hearing Impaired Child s Literacy Development With Language Experience Approach. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 111–144. https://ajindex.com/articles/375721

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Kaynakça Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klingner, J., Pugach, M. ve Richardson, V. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 195-207.
  2. Chaleff, C. ve Ritter, M. (2001). The use of miscue analysis with deaf readers. The Reading Teacher, 55(2), 190-200.
  3. Chute, P. M. ve Nevins, M. E. (2003). Educational challenges for children with cochlear implants. Topics in Language Disorders, 23(1), 57-67.
  4. Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Dorr, R. E. (2006). Something old is new again: Revisiting language experience. The Reading Teacher, 60(2), 138-146.
  5. Geers, A. E., Nicholas, J. G. ve Moog, J. S. (2007). Estimating the influence of cochlear implantation on language development in children. Audiological Medicine, 5, 262- 273. Girgin, Ü. (2012). Phonic-based sentence method f or students with hearing impairment: A case study f rom Turkey. Saarbrücken: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing. Harp, B. ve Brewer, J. A. (2005). The inf ormed reading teacher: Research-based practice. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc. Heilman, A. W., Blair, T. R. ve Rupley, W. H. (2002). Principles and p ractices of teaching reading (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall. Johnson, R. B. ve Christensen, L. B. (2004). Educational research: Quantative, qualitative, and mixed approach. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bocan. LaSasso, C. J. ve Mobley, R. T. (1997). National survey of reading instruction for deaf or hard-of-hearing students in the U.S. Volta Review, 99(1), 31-58.
  6. Lewis, S. (1997). Supporting reading within an auditory oral approach. International Conf erence on Deaf Education. [Available online at: http://www.ssc.education.ed.ac.uk/resources/deaf/slewis.html], Retrieved on April 12, 2009.
  7. Marschark, M. ve Spencer, P. E. (2009). Evidence of best practice models and outcomes in the education of deaf and hard-of -hearing children: An international review. National Council for Special Education Reports No: 1. [Available online at: http://www.ncse.ie/uploads/1/1_NCSE_Deaf.pdf], Retrieved on December 05, 2013
  8. Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Mertler, C. A. (2006). Action research: Teachers as researchers in the classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Miller, W. H. (2005). Improving early literacy: Strategies and activities f or struggling students