Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry / 2014 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4

Yükseköğretimde Öğrenci Bağlılığını Etkileyen Faktörler ve Teknolojinin Öğrenci Bağlılığındaki Rolü: Kampüs-Ders-Teknoloji Kuramı

Factors Influencing Student Engagement and the Role of Technology in Student Engagement in Higher Education: Campus-Class-Technology Theory

Pages
86–113
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, it was seen that the components constituting and influencing student engagement were found to be campus engagement and class engagement.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the present study was to determine both the factors influencing student engagement and the role and influence of technology on student engagement.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research sample included a total of 45 student teachers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, it was seen that the components constituting and influencing student engagement were found to be campus engagement and class engagement.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to determine both the factors influencing student engagement and the role and influence of technology on student engagement. The study is important as it aimed at determining the views of students about student engagement and examining in detail the research data to be collected with two different data collection techniques. The present study was designed as a grounded theory study. The research sample included a total of 45 student teachers. Of all the participants, 25 of them participated in face-to-face Interviews, and 20 of them were asked to take part in written compositions. In conclusion, it was seen that the components constituting and influencing student engagement were found to be campus engagement and class engagement. It was found out that for most of the participating students, use of technology in class was not an indispensable factor for student engagement. In addition, an effective technology integration would not only contribute much to student engagement but also constitute an important way of increasing student engagement. Finally, it was seen that use of technology in instructional activities constituted an important factor for student engagement, when the findings obtained via the interviews and the written compositions were taken into consideration together.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, öğrenci bağlılığını etkileyen faktörleri ve derste kullanılan teknolojilerin öğrenci bağlılığındaki rolünü belirlemektir. Bu çalışma, iki farklı veri toplama tekniğinin kullanılması ve durumun kendi doğal bağlamında incelenerek detaylı veri toplanması açısından önemlidir. Bu çalışma gömülü kuram ile desenlenmiştir. Araştırmanın katılımcıları toplamda 45 öğretmen adayı oluşturmuştur. Yüzyüze yapılan görüşmeler için 25, kompozisyon için 20 öğretmen adayı katılımcı olarak belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak, öğrenci bağlılığını etkileyen faktörler, kampüse ve derse bağlılık bileşenleri altında ele alınmıştır. Ayrıca, birçok öğrenci için derste teknoloji kullanımı bağlılıklarının artması için şart görülmemiştir. Ancak etkili teknoloji entegrasyonunun, sadece öğrenci bağlılığına katkı sağlamadığı ayrıca öğrenci bağlılığını artırmanın önemli yollarından biri de olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Tüm bulgular sonucunda, öğrenci bağlılığı ve teknoloji kullanımı arasındaki ilişkiler çalışma sonucunda geliştirilen Kampüs-Ders-Teknoloji Kuramı ile açıklanmaya çalışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNÜÇ, S., KUZU, A. (2014). Yükseköğretimde Öğrenci Bağlılığını Etkileyen Faktörler ve Teknolojinin Öğrenci Bağlılığındaki Rolü: Kampüs-Ders-Teknoloji Kuramı. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4, 86–113. https://ajindex.com/articles/375709

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ahlfeldt, S., Mehta, S., & Sellnow, T. (2005). Measurement and analysis of student engagement in university classes where varying levels of PBL methods of instruction are in use. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(1), 5-20.
  2. Ang, K.H., & Wang, Q. (2006). A case study of engaging primary school students in learning science by using active worlds. Proceedings of the First International LAMS Conference 2006:
  3. Designing the Future of Learning, Sydney, Australia. Angus Busby, T.L. (2011). An exploration of campus recreation's role in student engagement. (Unpublished master dissertation), Manitoba Üniversitesi.
  4. Bayne, S., & Ross, J. (2007). The ‘digital native’ and ‘digital immigrant’: A dangerous opposition. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Research into Higher Education (SRHE), Brighton, Sussex, UK Beer, C., Clark, K., & Jones, D. (2010).
  5. Indicators of engagement. in C Steel, M Keppell, P Gerbic & S Housego (eds.) ASCILITE 2010 Proceedings: Curriculum, Technology & Transformation for an Unknown Future, 2010, Sydney, pp. 75-86.
  6. Berque, D. (2004). Fostering classroom engagement with electronic whiteboards, tablet pcs, and dyknow. Retrieved September 15, 2013, from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/EPS207.pdf
  7. Bouta, H., Retalis, S., & Paraskeva, F. (2012). Utilizing a collaborative macro-script to enhance student engagement: A mixed method study in a3D Virtual Environment. Computers in Education, 58(1), 501-517.
  8. Bryson, C., & Hand, L. (2007). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 44(4), 349-362.
  9. Chen, P.S.D, Lambert, A.D., & Guidry, K.R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based learning technology on student engagement. Computers & Education, 54, 1222-1232.
  10. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven Principles of good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3-7.
  11. Cole, M. (2009). Using Wiki technology to support student engagement: Lessons from the trenches. Computers & Education, 52, 141-146.
  12. Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. C. (2007). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication. Creswell, J.W. ( 2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating qualitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Dunleavy, J., & Milton, P. (2009). What did you do in school today? Exploring the Concept of St