Journals / Turkish Journal of Orthodontics / 2017 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

Treatment of a Class II Case with Palatally Inserted Distalization Mechanics in an Epilepsy Patient

Pages
61–68
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Miniscrew anchorage used during distalization is an effective non-extraction treatment option for dental Class II malocclusion correction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This case report describes the protocol employed in the treatment of a patient with Class II malocclusion with mechanics including palatally positioned miniscrews.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Treatment included the distalization of maxillary posterior teeth with mechanics including 2 miniscrews positioned on the palatal side.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Miniscrew anchorage used during distalization is an effective non-extraction treatment option for dental Class II malocclusion correction.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This case report describes the protocol employed in the treatment of a patient with Class II malocclusion with mechanics including palatally positioned miniscrews. Treatment included the distalization of maxillary posterior teeth with mechanics including 2 miniscrews positioned on the palatal side. After a certain amount of distalization was achieved, the maxillary arch was bonded with Roth prescription brackets while the appliance was still active. When leveling of the upper arch was finished, the appliance was kept in the mouth as a retention device while the mandibular arch was bonded to continue treatment, which lasted for a total of 15.5 months. Mandibular and maxillary fixed retainers were placed at the end of active treatment. Pretreatment and post-treatment records revealed that vertical and sagittal skeletal cephalometric findings were not affected. Miniscrew anchorage used during distalization is an effective non-extraction treatment option for dental Class II malocclusion correction.

🔖

Cite This Article

SIRMAN, S. S. H., ÖZCAN, M., TOZLU, M. (2017). Treatment of a Class II Case with Palatally Inserted Distalization Mechanics in an Epilepsy Patient. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 61–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/375071

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Angle, Edward H. Classification of malocclusion. Dent cosmos 1899; 41: 248-64
  2. Patel A, Burden DJ, Sandler J. Medical disorders and orthodontics. J Orthod 2009; 36(Suppl): 1-21. [CrossRef] 3. Burden D, Mullally B, Sandler J. Orthodontic treatment of patients with medical disorders. Eur J Orthod 2001; 23: 363-72. [CrossRef] 4. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. 2009; 32(Suppl. 1): S62-7
  3. Fisher RS, Van Emde Boas W, Blume W, Elger C, Genton P, Lee P, et al. Epileptic seizures and epilepsy: Definitions proposed by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) and the International Bureau for Epilepsy (IBE). Epilepsi 2005; 46: 470-2. [CrossRef] 6. Aragon CE, Burneo JG. Understanding the patient with epilepsy and seizures in the dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 2007; 73: 71-6
  4. Ludwig B, Glasl B, Bowman SJ, Wilmes B, Kinzinger GSM, Lisson JA. Anatomical guidelines for miniscrew insertion: palatal sites. J Clin Orthod 2011; 45: 433-41; quiz 467
  5. Burhan A. Combined treatment with headgear and the frog appliance for maxillary molar distalization: A randomized controlled trial. Korean J Orthod 2013; 43: 101-9. [CrossRef] 9. Bagga DK. Adult orthodontics versus adolescent orthodontics: An overview. J Oral Heal Comm Dent 2010; 44: 42-7
  6. Fontana M, Cozzani M, Caprioglio A. Non-compliance maxillary molar distalizing appliances: An overview of the last decade. Prog Orthod 2012; 13: 173-84. [CrossRef] 11. Çetinşahin A, Arman A. Application of Implants for Orthodontic Anchorage. Turkish J Orthod 2005; 18: 77-89. [CrossRef] 12. Papageorgiou SN, Zogakis IP, Papadopoulos MA. Failure rates and associated risk factors of orthodontic miniscrew implants: A meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 142: 577-95. [CrossRef] 13. Ozdemir F, Uyar VO, Ulkur F. Treatment of Class II maxillary retrusion case using miniscrew (nonextraction treatment of adolescent patient). Turkish J Orthod 2014; 27: 117-27. [CrossRef] 14. Choi YJ, Lee JS, Cha JY, Park YC. Total distalization of the maxillary arch in a patient with skeletal Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139: 823-33. [CrossRef] 15. Saito S, Sugimoto N, Morohashi T, Ozeki M, Kurabayashi H, Shimizu H, et al. Endosseous titanium implants as anchors for mesiodistal tooth movement in the beagle dog. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2000; 118: 601-7. [CrossRef] 16. Sugawara J, Daimaruya T, Umemori M, Nagasaka H, Takahashi I, Kawamura H, et al. D