Journals / Current Research in Dental Sciences / 2023 / Cilt: 33 Sayı: 4 - 2023, 33:4

Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Management Performance of 4 Different Orthodontic Health-Care Institutions Held by Public, Private, and Foundation Systems in Turkey: A Preliminary Study

Pages
231–237
Publication Date
2023-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Doctors in filiation applications had an important role in the overall welfare of the people.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This article presents a comparison of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic man- agement activities between different health-care institutions providing orthodontic treatment services.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Patients from 1 public university, 1 oral and dental health center affiliated to the Ministry of Health, 1 foundation university, and 2 private dental practices in Bursa and Bolu were asked to complete a questionnaire about the problems they experienced with their ongoing treatments during the coronavirus disease 2019 quarantine process.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Doctors in filiation applications had an important role in the overall welfare of the people.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:COVID-19 · delivery of health care · orthodontics

Abstract

Objective: This article presents a comparison of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic man- agement activities between different health-care institutions providing orthodontic treatment services. Methods: Patients from 1 public university, 1 oral and dental health center affiliated to the Ministry of Health, 1 foundation university, and 2 private dental practices in Bursa and Bolu were asked to complete a questionnaire about the problems they experienced with their ongoing treatments during the coronavirus disease 2019 quarantine process. Descriptive statistics with percentages were performed, and the institutions were compared in terms of their performance in managing the pandemic process based on the answers. Results: The questionnaire was answered by 1108 people. The comparisons between institutions revealed the superiority of private practices in appointment arrangement frequency by having appointments within 1 month by 19.8%, in communication skills with 4.04 mean value, and in anxiety management by 3.08 mean value of anxiety frequency about treatment elongation when evaluated with a 5-point Likert scale. The rate of not being informed about pandemic manage- ment was highest in foundation universities. Conclusion: The quarantine and coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic showed to have an impact on orthodontic treatments. In private practices, the patient–doctor interaction was more effec- tive. Private practices have the lowest anxiety levels. Only private practices used video calls for communication. Doctors in filiation applications had an important role in the overall welfare of the people. However, this operation had a deteriousle impact on orthodontic appointments and treatment options. Keywords: COVID-19, delivery of health care, orthodontics ÖZ Amaç: Bu makale, ortodontik tedavi hizmeti veren farklı sağlık kurumları arasındaki COVID-19 pan- demi yönetimi faaliyetlerinin bir karşılaştırmasını sunmaktadır. Yöntemler: 1 devlet üniversitesi, Sağlık Bakanlığı'na bağlı 1 ağız ve diş sağlığı merkezi (ADSM), 1 vakıf üniversitesi ve Bursa ve Bolu'daki 2 özel ortodontist muayenehanesinde tedavi gören has- talardan COVID-19 karantina sürecinde devam eden tedavilerinde yaşadıkları sorunlar hakkında bir anket doldurmaları istendi. Deskriptif istatistikler yapıldı ve kurumlar, verilen yanıtlara göre pandemi sürecini yönetmedeki performansları açısından karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Anket 1108 kişi tarafından yanıtlandı. Kurumlar arası karşılaştırmalar, özel muayenehanelerin rutin aylık kontrolleri ger- çekleştirebilme oranının %19,8 olduğunu; 5’li Likert ölçeğine göre iletişim becerilerinde 4,04, tedavinin sürecinin uzamasına yönelik kaygı yönetimi başarısında 3,08 ortalama değeri ile üstünlüğünü ortaya koydu. Pandemi yönetimi konusunda bilgilendirilmeme oranı vakıf üniversitelerinde en yüksek bulundu. Sonuç: Karantina ve COVID-19 pandemisinin ortodontik tedavileri etkilediği gösterildi. Özel muayenehanelerin hasta-doktor etki- leşiminde daha etkin olduğu, özel kliniklerde tedavi gören hastaların en düşük kaygı düzeyine sahip olduğu ortaya çıktı . Görüntülü iletişim yolunu yalnızca özel muayenehaneler kullandı. Filiasyon uygulamalarında doktorlar, halkın genel refahında önemli bir role sahipti. Ancak bu uygulamanın ortodontik randevuları ve tedavi seçeneklerini olumsuz etkilediği ortaya kondu. Anahtar Kelimeler: COVID-19, sağlık hizmeti, ortodonti

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖK, G. D., SIRMAN, S. S. H., GÜLYURT, M., BAYDAŞ, B., HALICIOĞLU, K., DURNA, N. B., KOÇAL, G. (2023). Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Management Performance of 4 Different Orthodontic Health-Care Institutions Held by Public, Private, and Foundation Systems in Turkey: A Preliminary Study. Current Research in Dental Sciences, Cilt: 33 Sayı: 4 - 2023, 33:4, 231–237. https://ajindex.com/articles/968540

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ge ZY, Yang LM, Xia JJ, Fu XH, Zhang YZ. Possible aerosol transmis- sion of COVID-19 and special precautions in dentistry. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2020
  2. 21(5):361-368. [CrossRef] 2. Meng L, Hua F, Bian Z. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): emerg- ing and future challenges for dental and oral medicine. J Dent Res. 2020
  3. 99(5):481-487. [CrossRef] 3. Cura Yayla BC, Özsürekçi Y, Aykaç K, et al. Characteristics and Man- agement of Children with COVID-19 in Turkey. Balkan Med J. 2020
  4. 37(6):341-347. [CrossRef] 4. Sağlık Bakanlığı TC. Diş hekimliğinde acil ve zorunlu hizmet güncel- lemesi. Available at: http://www.tdb.org.tr/userfiles/files/SB_Halk_ Sagligi_Gen_Mud_190.pdf. Accessed April 6, 2020. 5. Meslektaşlarımız da pandemi için sahada. Available at:http: //www.tdb.org.tr/icerik_goster.php?Id=3430. Accessed April 6, 2020. 6. Elektif işlemlerin ertelenmesi ve diğer alınacak tedbirler. Available at: https://shgmhastahakdb.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/36865/0/elektif-isle mlerin-ertelenmesi-ve-diger-tedbirlerpdf.pdf. Accessed September 4, 2020. 7. Dishekimliği bulunan tum universiteler. Available at: https://yokatlas.yok.gov.tr/lisans-bolum.php?b=10049. Accessed September 16, 2020. 8. Ozyavas S. Türkiye’de ağız diş sağlığı Politikası: mevcut durum analizi. Hacettepe Saglik İdaresi Derg. 2018
  5. 21(4):789-805. 9. Yilmaz F, Senel IK, Ince O. Ağız ve diş sağlığı hastaneleri ve ağız ve diş sağlığı merkezlerinin etkinliklerinin veri zarflama analizi ile değerlendirilmesi. Yönetim Ekon Araştırmaları Derg. 2019
  6. 17(4):72-90. 10. Hancock M, Calnan M, Manley G. Private or NHS General Dental Ser- vice care in the United Kingdom? A study of public perceptions and experiences. J Public Health Med. 1999
  7. 21(4):415-420. [CrossRef] 11. Cotrin P, Peloso RM, Pini NIP, et al. Urgencies and emergencies in orthodontics during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: Brazil- ian orthodontists’ experience. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020
  8. 158(5):661-667. [CrossRef] 12. Basu S, Andrews J, Kishore S, Panjabi R, Stuckler D. Comparative performance of private and public healthcare systems in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. PLOS Med. 2012
  9. 9(6):e1001244. [CrossRef] 13. Keles F, Bos A. Satisfaction with orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2013
  10. 83(3):507-511. [CrossRef] 14. Telles-Araujo GT, Caminha RDG, Kallás MS, Santos PSDS. Teledentistry support in COVID-19 oral care. Clinics. 2020
  11. e2030. [CrossRef] 15. Talla PK, Levin L, Glogauer M, Cable C, Allison PJ. Delivering den