SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care / 2016 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4

Youth Perspectives on Intergenerational Solidarity in Families

MUHAMMET SERHAT ÖZTÜRK
OYA HAZER
Pages
222–232
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: It was found that there are some statistically significant relationships between normative solidarity and consensual solidarity, age, functional solidarity, education level of parents/grandparents, number of siblings and gender.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to determine intergenerational solidarity in families, and examine the scores and relations of the dimensions of intergenerational solidarity (Normative solidarity, Affectual solidarity, Associational solidarity, Consensual solidarity, Functional solidarity, Structural solidarity).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: A sample of 1006 young people age between 15-29 from the socio-economic levels participated in the study, and their intergenerational solidarity were determined by the theory Bengtson’s Intergenerational solidarity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: It was found that there are some statistically significant relationships between normative solidarity and consensual solidarity, age, functional solidarity, education level of parents/grandparents, number of siblings and gender.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Intergenerational solidarity · family support

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to determine intergenerational solidarity in families, and examine the scores and relations of the dimensions of intergenerational solidarity (Normative solidarity, Affectual solidarity, Associational solidarity, Consensual solidarity, Functional solidarity, Structural solidarity). Method: A sample of 1006 young people age between 15-29 from the socio-economic levels participated in the study, and their intergenerational solidarity were determined by the theory Bengtson’s Intergenerational solidarity. Results: It was found that there are some statistically significant relationships between normative solidarity and consensual solidarity, age, functional solidarity, education level of parents/grandparents, number of siblings and gender. Conclusion: Intergenerational solidarity was found over middle levels. Accordingly, intergenerational solidarity in families has to be maintained and strengthened by all the units like government and non-governmental organizations with projects and programmes.Amaç: Bu araştırmada, ailelerde nesiller arası dayanışma boyutlarını (normatif dayanışma, duygusal dayanışma, ilişkisel dayanışma, işlevsel dayanışma, uzlaşımsal dayanışma ve yapısal dayanışma) ve bu boyutlar arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi ile aile yaşantısını güçlendirme, nesiller arası beklentilerin anlaşılması ve nesiller arasındaki sorunlara çözüm yolları bulunması amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: Ankara’nın üç farklı sosyo-demografik bölgesinde, farklı yaş gruplarındaki (15-29 yaş) 990 gence, nesiller arası dayanışmaya ilişkin sorular yöneltilmiş ve katılımcılar bu soruları annelerinden, babalarından, büyük annelerinden ya da büyük babalarından bir tanesini dikkate alarak cevaplamışlardır. Bulgular: Araştırmanın sonucunda, nesiller arası normatif dayanışma ile duygusal dayanışma, işlevsel dayanışma (ebeveyn/büyük ebeveyne yardımda bulunma), yapısal dayanışma (ailenin genişliği), ilişkisel dayanışma ve uzlaşımsal dayanışma ile pozitif yönde ilişki bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Araştırmada, gençlerin aileleri ile birliktelik ve bütünlüklerinin hala sürdürüldüğü, dolayısıyla dayanışma düzeylerinin orta seviyeler ve üstünde olduğu görülmüştür. Nesiller arası dayanışmanın kuvvetlendirilmesi ve sürdürülmesi doğrultusunda, bütün bu paydaşların ortak çalışmalarıyla bölgesel, toplumsal bazda programlar ve projeler geliştirilmeli ve uygulanmalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTÜRK, M. S., HAZER, O. (2016). Youth Perspectives on Intergenerational Solidarity in Families. Turkish Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4, 222–232. https://ajindex.com/articles/374114

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Hanson, SL, Saur WJ, Seelbach WC. Racial and cohort variations in filial responsibility norms. The Gerontologist 1983;23 (6): 626–31
  2. Attar-Schwartz, S, Tan JP, Buchanan A. Adolescents’perspectives on relationships with grandparents: The contribution of adolescent, grandparent, and parent–grandparent relationship variables. Children and Youth Services Review 2009; 31: 1057–1066
  3. Franklin DL. Ensuring inequality: The structural transformation of the African American family. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997. p. 134
  4. Hazer O. Ergenlerin büyük ebeveynlerinden beklentilerini etkileyen faktörlerin incelenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyolojik Araştırmalar E- dergisi, http://www.sdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/oyahazer2makale.pdf, 5 Nisan 2011. 1-22
  5. Glazer NY. The home as workshop: Women as amateur nurses and medical care providers. Gender and Society 1990; 4 (4): 479-499
  6. Abel EK. Who Cares for the Elderly: Public Policy and the Experiences of Adult Daughters. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. 1991. p.142
  7. Stoller EP. Parental caregiving by adult children. Journal of Marriage and the Family 1983; 45: 851-858
  8. Sussman MB. Reflections on intergenerational and kin connections. Marriage and Family Review 1991; 16: 3-9
  9. Netzer JK. Intergenerational solidarity and plans for care in later life families. Yayınlanmamış Doktora tezi, University of Florida, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri, 1994, p. 67-90
  10. Bengtson V. Beyond the nuclear family: the increasing importance of multigenerational bonds. Journal of Marriage and Family 2001; 63(1):1-17
  11. Baran AG., Çoban S. Kuramsal Açıdan Kuşaklararası Dayanışma: Yaşlı-Genç İlişkileri, Kuşaklararası Dayanışma ve Aktif Yaşlanma Sempozyum Bildirileri, Grafer Tasarım Baskı Ambalaj, Ankara. 2012. p. 189
  12. Kalaycıoğlu S. Kuşaklararası Dayanışma ve Aktif Yaşlanma, Kuşaklararası Dayanışma ve Aktif Yaşlanma Sempozyum Bildirileri, Grafer Tasarım Baskı Ambalaj, Ankara. 2012. p. 51
  13. Bengtson VL, Roberts REL. Intergenerational solidarity in aging families: An example of formal theory construction. Journal of Marriage and the Family 1991; 53:856-870
  14. Silverstein M, VL. Bengtson. Intergenerational solidarity and the structure of adult child-parent relationship in american families. The American Journal of Sociology 1997; 103(2): 429-460
  15. Bengston V, Giarrusso R, Mabry JB, Silverstein M. Solidarity, conflict, and ambivalence: complementary or competing perspectives on intergenerational relation