Journals / Journal of Research in Economics / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OF REDUCING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS VIA ENERGY SUBSTITUTION AND CARBON TAX

Pages
46–60
Publication Date
2022-03-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this way, while environmental targets are reached contraction in the economy will be less.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Accordingly, with the decisions taken under Paris Conference-2015, Turkey has committed to constraint greenhouse gas emissions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Turkey has also determined her energy use targets as documented in Energy Strategy Document in which partial substitution of natural gas used in electricity production with some other energy sources is suggested as an alternative instrument in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this way, while environmental targets are reached contraction in the economy will be less.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Greenhouse Gas Emissions · Energy Substitution · Carbon Tax

Abstract

Accordingly, with the decisions taken under Paris Conference-2015, Turkey has committed to constraint greenhouse gas emissions. An environmentally efficient way to do this is controlling industrial processes and fossil fuel use. Turkey has also determined her energy use targets as documented in Energy Strategy Document in which partial substitution of natural gas used in electricity production with some other energy sources is suggested as an alternative instrument in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. This study aims at developing a policy package to reduce total greenhouse gas emissions and to carry out the environmental and economic impact analysis of the policy package. Findings suggest that energy substitution will not be enough to achieve the targets proposed under Paris Conference commitments. Carbon taxing should be applied besides energy substitution, but rather on all industries it should be applied on selected polluter industries. In this way, while environmental targets are reached contraction in the economy will be less.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZGÜR, R. Ö., ÇAĞATAY, S. (2022). ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OF REDUCING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS VIA ENERGY SUBSTITUTION AND CARBON TAX. Journal of Research in Economics, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 46–60. https://ajindex.com/articles/372329

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Allan, G., Lecca, P., McGregor, P. and Swales, K. (2014). The Economic and Environmental Impact of Carbon Tax for Scotland: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis, Ecological Economics, 100: 40-50.
  2. Alton, T., Arndt, C., Davies, R., Hartley, F., Makrelov, K., Thurlow, J. and Ubogu, D. (2014). Introducing Carbon Taxes in South Africa. Applied Energy, 116: 344-354.
  3. Beck, M., Rivers, N., Wigle, R. and Yonezawa, H. (2015). Carbon Tax and Revenue Recycling: Impacts on Households in British Columbia. Resource and Energy Economics, 41: 40-69.
  4. Bhutto, N. and Çağatay, S. (2010). Measuring Sectoral Share of Green House Gases Emissions From Fossil Fuel Consumption and Offering Solutions: The Case of Turkey. Maria Llop (ed.), Air Pollution: Economic Modelling and Control Policies, Bentham Books. Bourgeois, C., Giraudet, L.G. and Quirion, P. (2021). Lump-sum vs. energyefficiency subsidy recycling of carbon tax revenue in the residential sector: A French assessment. Ecological Economics, Elsevier, https://hal-enpc.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02073964v2.
  5. Bouzaher, A., Şahin, Ş. and Yeldan, E. (2015). How to go Green: A General Equilibrium Investigation of Environmental Policies for Sustained Growth with an Application to Turkey’s Economy. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 8(1): 49-76.
  6. Bosello, F. and Carraro, C. (2001). Recycling Energy Taxes: Impacts on a Disaggregated Labour Market. Energy Economics: 23, 569-594.
  7. Brenner, M., Riddle, M. and K. Boyce, J. (2005). A Chinese Sky Trust? Distributional Impacts of Carbon Charges and Revenue Recycling in China. Energy Policy, 35(3): 1771-1784.
  8. Bureau, B. (2011). Distributional Effects of a Carbon Tax on Car Fuels in France. Energy Economics, 33: 121-130.
  9. Combet, E., Ghersi, F., Hourcade, J.C. and Thery, D. (2010). Carbon Tax and Equity: The Importance of Policy Design. Dias Soares, C., Milne, J., Ashiabor, H., Deketelaere, K., Kreiser, L. (ed.), Critical Issues inEnvironmental Taxation, içinde: 277-295.
  10. Oxford University Press.
  11. Conefrey, T., Gerald, J.F., Valeri, L.M and Tol, R.S.J. (2008). The Impact of a Carbon Tax on Economic Growth and Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Ireland. Working Paper No. 251. Çağatay, S., Taşdoğan, C. and Özeş, R. (2017). Analyzing the Impact of Targeted Bio-Ethanol Blending Ratio in Turkey. Bio-Based and Applied Economics, 6(2): 53-71.
  12. Dissou, Y. and Eyland, T. (2011).
  13. Carbon Control Policies, Competitiveness and Border Tax Adjustments. Energy Economics, 33: 556-564. Energy Efficiency Strategy Do