Journals / Turkish Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care / 2015 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Çanakkale de Migren Prevelansı ve ilişkili Faktörler

Migraine prevalence and related factors in Çanakkale

Pages
16–22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition the variables of being female and employed increased the possibility of migraine.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: Due to the severity of pain, effects on quality of life, and economic effects on individuals and society, migraine is a significant public health problem.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: In this cross-sectional, descriptive study, total of 942 volunteer participants in the age of 18-89, living in the center of Canakkale Western Anatolia, were enrolled from the nine primary care centers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition the variables of being female and employed increased the possibility of migraine.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: Due to the severity of pain, effects on quality of life, and economic effects on individuals and society, migraine is a significant public health problem. Objectives: to determine prevalence, socio-demographic characteristics and risk factors of migraine in western Anatolia. Method: In this cross-sectional, descriptive study, total of 942 volunteer participants in the age of 18-89, living in the center of Canakkale Western Anatolia, were enrolled from the nine primary care centers. A questionnaire asking about their socio-demographic features was applied, and the ID-Migraine Screening Test was administered. The participants answering the ID-Migraine test were questioned about characteristics of headache, triggering factors and accompanying complaints along with loss of labor and quality of life during attacks. Results: The mean age of the participants was 44.1±15.00. According to the ID-Migraine Screening test the prevalence of migraine was 15% (n=141) with a rate of 4.7% (n=44) in males and 10.3% (n=97) in females. Results of the multivariate analysis suggested that the risk of developing migraine increased 2.7 times by being female (95% CI: 1.75-4.00), and 2.0 times increased by being employed (95 CI: 1.37-3.05). There were 89 women (65.0%) and 40 men (29.2%) who reported migraine attacks affecting daily work. There was no statistically significant relationship between migraine attacks affecting daily life and gender. Conclusion: the prevalence of migraine in western Anatolia was 15%, lower than the average for Turkey. In addition the variables of being female and employed increased the possibility of migraine.

Özet

Giriş: Ağrının şiddeti, yaşam kalitesine etkisi, bireysel ve toplumsal ekonomik etkileri nedeniyle migren dünyada önemli bir halk sağlığı sorunudur. Amaç: Migrenin Batı Anadoludaki sıklığı, sosyo-demografik özellikleri ve risk faktörlerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Metot: Tanımlayıcı kesitsel desendeki bu çalışmada, Anadolunun batısındaki Çanakkale il merkezinde bulunan dokuz aile sağlığı merkezinden 18-81 yaş arasında toplam 942 gönüllü katılımcıya ulaşıldı. Çalışmada katılımcılara sosyo-demografik özelliklerini sorgulayan anket ile ID-migren testi uygulandı. ID-Migren Testine göre migren olan katılımcılara baş ağrısının karakteri, tetikleyici faktörleri ve baş ağrısı atakları esnasında yaşadıkları işgücü kaybı sorgulandı. Bulgular: Katılımcıların yaş ortalaması 44,1±15,00 idi. ID-Migren testine göre migren sıklığı %15,0 (n=141), erkeklerde %4,7 (n=44) ve bayanlarda %10,3 (n=97) sıklıkta saptandı. Çok değişkenli analiz sonuçlarına göre migren gelişme riskini kadın olmak 2,7 kat (%95 GA: 1,75- 4,00), çalışıyor olmak 2,0 kat (%95 GA: 1,37-3,05) artırmaktaydı. Migren atağının günlük işlevselliği etkilediğini belirten 89 kadın (%65,0) ve 40 (%29,2) erkek katılımcı vardı. Sonuç: Çalışmamızda Anadolunun batısında migren sıklığı %15 olarak saptanmış olup, Türkiye ortalamasının altındadır. Bununla birlikte kadın olmak ve çalışıyor olmak değişkenlerinin migren olma olasılığını artırdığı tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULUDAĞ, A., ŞAHİN, E. M., CEVİZCİ, S., BATU, B., GUZEY, O., PETRİCLİ, U., SEYHAN, L., ÖZKAN, D., ISLEYEN, N., ARSLAN, K., YELPAZE, S., ASKIN, M. (2015). Çanakkale de Migren Prevelansı ve ilişkili Faktörler. Turkish Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 16–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/371382

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Rasmussen BK. Epidemiology of Headache. Cephalgia 2001; 21:774-7. 2.World Health Organization. The World Health Report, Mental Health, new understanding, New Hope Geneva, 2001. 3. Merikangas RK. Contributions of epidemiology to our understanding of migraine. Headache 2013;53(2):230-246. 4. Yücel Y. Migren baş ağrısında tanı ve tedavi yaklaşımları. Journal of Dicle Medicine 2008; 35: 281- 286. 5. Lipton RB, Scher AI, Steiner TJ, et al. Patterns of health care utilization for migraine in England and in the United States. Neurology 2003; 60(3): 441-448. 6. Symvoulakis EK, Clark LV, Dowson AJ, Jones R, et al. Headache: a ‘suitable case’ for behavioural treatment in primary care? Br J Gen Pract 2007(536); 57: 231–237. 7. Ertas M, Baykan B, Kocasoy Orhan E, et al. One year prevalence and the impact of migraine and tension-type headache in Turkey: A nationwide home-based study in adults. J Headache Pain 2012;13(2):147-157. 8. Lipton RB, Dodick D, Sadovsky R, Kolodner K, Endicott J, Hettiarachchi J, Harrison W. ID a selfadministered screener for migraine in primary care: The ID Migraine validation study. Neurology 2003; 12;61(3):375-82. 9. Karli N, Ertas M, Baykan B et al. The validation of ID migraine screener in neurology outpatient clinics in Turkey. J Headache Pain 2007; 8(4):217–223. 10. Kim BK, Chu MK, Lee TG, Kim JM, Chung CS, Lee KS. Prevalence and impact of migraine and tension-type headache in Korea. J Clin Neurol 2012;8(3):204-11. 11. Schramm SH, Obermann M, Katsarava Z, Diener HC, Moebus S, Yoon MS. Epidemiological profiles of patients with chronic migraine and chronic tension-type headache. J Headache Pain. 2013; 14(1): 14-40. 12. Lucas C, Géraud G, Valade D, Chautard MH, LantériMinet M. Recognition and therapeutic management of migraine in 2004, in France: results of FRAMIG3, a French nationwide population-based survey. Headache. 2006;46(5): 715-25. 13. Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M, Freitag F, Reed ML, Stewart WF, AMPP Advisory Group. Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology. 2007;68(5):343-9. 14. Wang J, Huang Q, Li N, Tan G, Chen L, Zhou J. Triggers of migraine and tension-type headache in China: a clinic-based survey. J Eur Neurol. 2013;20(4):689-96. 15. Silva JrAA, Tavares RM, Lara RP, Faleiros BE, Gomez RS, Teixeira AL. Frequency of types of headache in the tertiary care center of the Hospital das Clínicas of the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, MG, Brazil. Rev Assoc Med Bras.2012; 58(6):709-1