Journals / Turkish Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care / 2020 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3

THE EFFECT OF PERSONAL SAFETY TRAINING PROGRAM FOR PRE SCHOOL CHILDREN

Pages
414–419
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion:As a result, body safety education program was effective in informing students about poisoning, communication with strangers and drowning.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction:Preschool children are more vulnerable and at risk to social, physical and environmental risks that threaten their personal safety.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Accordingly, it was calculated that 34 students (total 78 students) should be sampled in each group with 80% power and 5% error margin.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion:As a result, body safety education program was effective in informing students about poisoning, communication with strangers and drowning.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction:Preschool children are more vulnerable and at risk to social, physical and environmental risks that threaten their personal safety. It is important to teach children in this period how to protect their personal safety. Method:This study was aimed to determine the effectiveness of the body safety education program to preschool students. The study design was pre-post-test, non-randomized experimental and control group model. The sample size was calculated by G*power analysis. Accordingly, it was calculated that 34 students (total 78 students) should be sampled in each group with 80% power and 5% error margin. The study was completed with 80 students. Data were collected by personal information form and body safety information questionnaire. Written informed consent was obtained from the families before the study. The 5-session program, each of which lasted for 25 minutes, was implemented in 5 weeks for the training group (n=40). No intervention was applied to the control group. Chi-square test and Mc Nemar test were used for data analysis. Result:There was a significant difference between the pre-posttest responses of the children in the intervention group to the question in "Do you drink the drugs you find without telling the parent / teacher?” (p 0.05). Conclusion:As a result, body safety education program was effective in informing students about poisoning, communication with strangers and drowning.

🔖

Cite This Article

BALCI, A. S., KOLAÇ, N., KOCABAŞ, S., YAŞAR, S., GÜRSOY, H. T. (2020). THE EFFECT OF PERSONAL SAFETY TRAINING PROGRAM FOR PRE SCHOOL CHILDREN. Turkish Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3, 414–419. https://ajindex.com/articles/371258

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. CordovilR, Araujo D, Pepping G, Barreiros J. An ecological stance on risk and safe behaviors in children: The role of affordances and emergent behaviors. New Ideas in Psychology 2015
  2. Johnston, BD, Ebel BE. Child injury control: Trends, themes, and controversies. Academic Pediatrics 2013
  3. 13(6): 499-507 3.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 10 leading causes of injury deaths by age group. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS) www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/LeadingCauses.html, ErişimTarihi: 10.05.2019. 4.World Health Organization, Children: reducing mortality, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/ detail/children-reducing-mortality, Erişimtarihi: 23.05.2019. 5.Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. İstatistiklerle çocuk, 2017, https://www.tuseb.govtr/enstitu/ tacese/yuklemeler/istatistik/istatistiklerlecocuk2017.pdf, Erişim tarihi:23.05.2019. 6.Mack KA, Liller KD. Home injuries: potential for prevention. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine 2010
  4. 4(1):75-81. 7.Towner E, Mytton J. Prevention of unintentional injuries in children. Pediatrics and Child Health 2009
  5. 19(11): 517-521. 8.Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Beedle AS. Early life events and their consequences for later disease: A life history and evolutionary perspective. American Journal of Human Biology 2007
  6. 19(1):1-19. 9.Damashek A, Kuhn J. Toddlers' unintentional injuries: The role of maternal reported paternal and maternal supervision. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 2013
  7. 38(3):265-275. 10.DixonDR,BergstromR,SmithMN,TarboxJ.A review of research on procedures for teaching safety skills to persons with developmental disabilities.Research in Developmental Disabilities 2010
  8. 31(5):985-994. 11.Morrongiello BA. Caregiver supervision and child-injury risk: I. Issues in defining and measuring supervision
  9. II. Findings and directions for future research. Journal of PediatricPsychology 2005
  10. 30(7):536-552. 12.Setien MA, Han D, Zuniga GC, Mier N, Lucio RL, Treviño L. Does injury prevention education initiate household changes in a Spanish-speaking minority population? Journal of Community Health 2014
  11. 39(1): 167-172. 13.Sanberk İ, Emen M, Kabakçı D. An ınvestigation of socially advantaged and disadvantaged Turkish mothers’ views about training on preventing children from sexual abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse 2017
  12. 26(3): 288-307. 14.Çıtak Tunç, Gorak G,OzyaziciogluN, Ak B, Isil Ö, VuralP. Preventingchildsexualabuse: body safetytrainingforyoungchildren in Turkey.Journal o