Journals / Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology / 2019 / Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of Voice Quality and Cost Effectiveness of Endoscopic Cordectomy Using Microdissection Electrodes with Laser Cordectomy and Radiotherapy

Pages
1–6
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Cost effectiveness of ECRM was found to bebetter than the other two treatment techniques

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To compare the acoustic parameters andthe cost effectiveness achieved after endoscopic cordectomy using radiofrequency microdissection electrodes (ECRM) with those of transoral laser cordectomy and radiotherapy.Methods: The study included 81 disease-free patientspreviously treated for early larynx carcinoma (30 withECRM, 27 with transoral laser cordectomy, 24 withprimary radiotherapy).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Additionally, the costeffectiveness of all treatment procedures was calculated.Results: The GRBAS (G: Grade, R: Roughness, B:Breathiness, A: Asthenia, and S: Strain) scale showeda significant difference between the groups (p 0.05 for all).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Cost effectiveness of ECRM was found to bebetter than the other two treatment techniques
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: To compare the acoustic parameters andthe cost effectiveness achieved after endoscopic cordectomy using radiofrequency microdissection electrodes (ECRM) with those of transoral laser cordectomy and radiotherapy.Methods: The study included 81 disease-free patientspreviously treated for early larynx carcinoma (30 withECRM, 27 with transoral laser cordectomy, 24 withprimary radiotherapy). Post-treatment voice analysiswas performed in all patients. Additionally, the costeffectiveness of all treatment procedures was calculated.Results: The GRBAS (G: Grade, R: Roughness, B:Breathiness, A: Asthenia, and S: Strain) scale showeda significant difference between the groups (p 0.05 for all). Percent jitter, percent shimmer and fundamental frequency (F0) were significantlydifferent in the radiotherapy group than the ECRM andthe transoral laser cordectomy groups (p 0.05). The mean cost of the ECRM technique wasstatistically lower than the other treatment techniques(p<0.05). Moreover, the length of hospital stay afterECRM was statistically significantly shorter than wasafter laser cordectomy (p<0.05).Conclusion: Objective and perceptive voice analysisafter ECRM showed comparable results with transoral laser cordectomy, but poorer results than radiotherapy. Cost effectiveness of ECRM was found to bebetter than the other two treatment techniques

🔖

Cite This Article

SÜRMELİ, M., OYSU, Ç., YILMAZ, A. A. Ş., DEVECİ, İ., KARABULUT, B., SÜNTER, A. V., YİĞİT, N. Ö., BIÇAKÇI, B. C. (2019). Comparison of Voice Quality and Cost Effectiveness of Endoscopic Cordectomy Using Microdissection Electrodes with Laser Cordectomy and Radiotherapy. Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology, Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 1, 1–6. https://ajindex.com/articles/368930

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Higgins KM. What treatment for early-stage glottic carcinoma among adult patients: CO2 endolaryngeal laser excision versus standard fractionated external beam radiation is superior in terms of cost utility? Laryngoscope 2011
  2. [CrossRef ] Abdurehim Y, Hua Z, Yasin Y, Xukurhan A, Imam I, Yuqin F. Transoral laser surgery versus radiotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis for treatment options of T1a glottic cancer. Head Neck 2012
  3. [CrossRef ] Yoo J, Lacchetti C, Hammond JA, Gilbert RW, Head and Neck Cancer Disease Site Group. Role of endolaryngeal surgery (with or without laser) versus radiotherapy in the management of early (T1) glottic cancer: a systematic review. Head Neck 2014
  4. [CrossRef ] Greulich MT, Parker NP, Lee P, Merati AL, Misono S. Voice outcomes following radiation versus laser microsurgery for T1 glottic carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015
  5. [CrossRef ] Basterra J, Frías S, Alba JR, Zapater E. A new device for treating laryngeal carcinoma using microdissection electrodes. Laryngoscope 2006
  6. [CrossRef ] Zapater E, Frías S, Pérez A, Basterra J. Comparative study on chronic tissue damage after cordectomies using either CO2 laser or microdissection electrodes. Head Neck 2009
  7. [CrossRef ] Basterra J, Zapater E, Moreno R, Hernández R. Electrosurgical endoscopic cordectomy with microdissection electrodes: a comparative study with CO2 laser. J Laryngol Otol 2006
  8. [CrossRef ] Remacle M, Eckel HE, Antonelli A, Brasnu D, Chevalier D, Friedrich G, et al. Endoscopic cordectomy. A proposal for a classification by the Working Committee, European Laryngological Society. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2000
  9. [CrossRef ] Roh JL, Kim DH, Kim SY, Park CI. Quality of life and voice in patients after laser cordectomy for Tis and T1 glottic carcinomas. Head Neck 2007
  10. 6 [CrossRef ] Rydell R, Schalén L, Fex S, Elner A. Voice evaluation before and after laser excision vs. radiotherapy of T1A glottic carcinoma. Acta Otolaryngol 1995
  11. [CrossRef ] Aaltonen LM, Rautiainen N, Sellman J, Saarilahti K, Mäkitie A, Rihkanen H, et al. Voice quality after treatment of early vocal cord cancer: a randomized trial comparing laser surgery with radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014
  12. [CrossRef ] van Loon Y, Sjögren EV, Langeveld TP, Baatenburg de Jong RJ, Schoones JW, van Rossum MA. Functional outc