Journals / Toraks Dergisi / 2001 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

Efficacy of cisplatin-etoposide chemotherapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

Metastatik küçük hücreli dışı akciğer kanserinde sisplatin-etoposid tedavisinin etkinliği

Pages
13–17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion; chemotherapy with cisplatin-etoposide is an effective treatment method in the management of me - tastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The role of chemotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been a matter of concern for many years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Between 1994-1997, 49 patients, who were diagnosed as having stage IV non-small cell lung cancer in our clinic, were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion; chemotherapy with cisplatin-etoposide is an effective treatment method in the management of me - tastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Akciğer neoplazmları · Karsinom · küçük hücreli dışı akciğer

Abstract

The role of chemotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been a matter of concern for many years. This study aims to compare cisplatin-etoposide combined treatment modality with supportive tre - atment in view to their impact on survival. Between 1994-1997, 49 patients, who were diagnosed as having stage IV non-small cell lung cancer in our clinic, were included in the study. Following all necessary clinical staging procedures, 22 cases received chemotherapy (Group C), while remaining 27 cases were treated symptomatically (Group S). Chemotherapy protocol inc - luded intravenously administered cisplatin with a dose of 80 mg/$m^2$/day on day one and etoposide with a dose of 100 mg/$m^ 2$/day starting on day one for three days with three-week intervals for a maximum of six cycles. "Kap - lan-Meier Product-Limit" method was utilized for survival analysis. In 22 cases of Group C, median survival was 8.8 months and one year survival rate was 32%. In 27 cases of Group S median survival was 3 months and one year survival rate was 4%. Median survival for Group C was significantly better (8.8 months) than that of Group S (3 months) (p <0.0002). Partial and complete response rates were 41% and 5% respectively, with a total response rate of 45%. Chemotherapy related side effects were encountered in half of the cases. In conclusion; chemotherapy with cisplatin-etoposide is an effective treatment method in the management of me - tastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

Özet

Metastatik küçük hücreli dışı akciğer kanserinde kemoterapinin yeri uzun yıllardır tartışma konusudur. Bu ça - lışmada sisplatin-etoposid tedavi rejiminin etkinliğinin destek tedavisi ile karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. 1994-1997 yılları arasında kliniğimizde evre IV küçük hücreli dışı akciğer kanseri tanısı almış 49 olgu çalışmaya alındı. Gerekli evreleme incelemeleri yapıldıktan sonra, 22 olguya kemoterapi (KT), 27 olguya destek tedavisi (DT) uygulandı. KT alan olgulara 1. gün 80 mg/$m^2$ sisplatin ve 100 mg/$m^2$ etoposid, 2-3. günlerde 100 mg/m 2 etoposid IV infüzyon olarak 21 gün aralarla en fazla altı siklus uygulandı. Sağkalım analizleri "Kaplan-Meier Product-Limit" yöntemiyle hesaplandı. KT alan 22 olguda medyan sağkalım süresi 8.8 ay, bir yıllık sağkalım oranı %32, DT alan 27 olguda ise medyan sağkalım süresi 3 ay ve bir yıllık sağkalım oranı %4 bulundu. DT ile KT gruplarının yaşam süreleri arasındaki fark KT lehine istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu (p <0.0002). KT grubunda %41 kısmi, %5 tam yanıt elde edildi (Toplam yanıt oranı %45). Yan etki görülme oranı %50 idi. Sonuç olarak; metastatik küçük hücreli dışı akciğer kanserinde sisplatin-etoposid kemoterapisi etkin bir tedavi yöntemidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

HALİLÇOLAR, H., AKSEL, N., ERTUĞRUL, G., BÖNCÜ, M., ÖZACAR, R. (2001). Efficacy of cisplatin-etoposide chemotherapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Toraks Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 13–17. https://ajindex.com/articles/367981

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ardizzoni A, Antonelli G, Grossi F, et al. The combination of etoposide and cisplatin in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Ann Oncol 1999; 10 (suppl 5):S13-7
  2. Çopur SA, Fırat S, Altınbaş H ve ark. Akciğer kanserlerinde tedavi. Solunum Hastalıkları 1995;6:145-63
  3. Raisner J, Hansen HH. Commentary: Current status of chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Treatment Reports 1981;65: 979-86
  4. Capewell S, Sudlow MF. Performance and prognosis in patients with lung cancer. Thorax 1990;45:951-6
  5. Charloux A, Hedelin G, Dietemann A. Prognostic value of histology in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 1997;17:123-34
  6. Macchiarini P, Fontanini G, Hardin MJ. Blood vessel invasion by tumor cells predicts recurrence in completely resected T1 N0 M0 Nonsmall cell lung cancer. J Thor Cardiovasc Surg 1993; 106:80-9
  7. Sause W, Kolesar P, Taylor S, et al. Final results of phase III trial in regionally advanced unresectabl non-small cell lung cancer. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, and Southwest Oncology Group. Chest 2000;117:358-64
  8. Böncü M, Ertuğrul G, Özacar R ve ark. Küçük hücreli dışı akciğer kanserlerinde histopatolojik parametrelerin sağkalıma etkisi. Ege Tıp Dergisi 1999;38 (2):91-3
  9. Kaasa S, Lund E, Thorud E, et al. Symptomatic treatment versus combination chemotherapy for patients with extensive non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer 1991; 67: 2443-7
  10. Paccagnella A, Brandes A, Pappagallo GL, et al. Cisplatin plus vindesine versus cisplatin plus VP16 versus doxorubicin plus cytoxan in nonsmall cell carcinoma of the lung. A randomised study. Tumori 1986;72: 417-25
  11. Veronesi A, Magri MD, Tirelli U, et al. Chemotherapy of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, methotrexate, and procarbazine versus cisplatin and etoposide. A randomised study. Am J Clin Oncol 1988;11:566-71
  12. Rosso R, Ardizzoni A, Salvati F, et al. Etoposide vs. etoposide and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A FONICAP randomised study. Semin Oncol 1988;15:49-51
  13. Crino L, Tonato M, Darwish S, et al. A randomised trial of three cisplatin- containing regimens in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A study of the Umbrian Lung Cancer Group. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1990;26:52-6
  14. Cardenal F, Cabrerizo PL, Anton A, et al. Randomised phase III study of gemcitabine-cisplatin versus etoposide-cisplatin in the treatment of locally advan